Lazareva Olga F, Freiburger Kate L, Wasserman Edward A
University of Iowa, IA 52242-1407, USA.
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
Four pigeons were previously trained [Lazareva, O.F., Freiburger, K.L., Wasserman, E.A., 2004. Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 1111-1117] to classify color photographs into either their proper basic-level category (cars, chairs, flowers, or people) or a superordinate-level category (nominally natural or artificial). In Experiment 1, the same pigeons were shown either reflected or inverted versions of the training stimuli. Reflection had no effect on pigeons' classification behavior, whereas inversion impaired discrimination of all stimulus categories, except flowers, on the basic-level and superordinate-level tasks. Pixel matching analysis revealed that pattern matching played at most a minor role in the birds' categorization behavior. In Experiment 2, the pigeons were shown test stimuli that were either blurred or quartered and scrambled. Blurring impaired discrimination of cars, but had no effect on discrimination of people and flowers; scrambling impaired discrimination of people and flowers leaving discrimination of cars and chairs unaffected. These results suggest that categorization of flowers and people may be controlled primarily by the overall shape of the object rather than by local features, whereas categorization of cars and chairs may rely primarily on local features rather than the overall shape of the object.
先前训练了四只鸽子[拉扎列娃,O.F.,弗赖伯格,K.L.,瓦瑟曼,E.A.,2004年。鸽子同时在基本和上级水平上对照片进行分类。《心理通报与评论》11,1111 - 1117],以便将彩色照片分类到其适当的基本水平类别(汽车、椅子、花朵或人物)或上级水平类别(名义上为自然或人造)。在实验1中,向同一只鸽子展示训练刺激的反射或倒置版本。反射对鸽子的分类行为没有影响,而倒置则损害了除花朵外所有刺激类别在基本水平和上级水平任务中的辨别能力。像素匹配分析表明,模式匹配在鸟类的分类行为中至多起次要作用。在实验2中,向鸽子展示模糊、四等分并打乱的测试刺激。模糊损害了对汽车的辨别,但对人物和花朵的辨别没有影响;打乱损害了对人物和花朵的辨别,而对汽车和椅子的辨别没有影响。这些结果表明,花朵和人物的分类可能主要由物体的整体形状而非局部特征控制,而汽车和椅子的分类可能主要依赖于局部特征而非物体的整体形状。