Lazareva Olga F, Freiburger Kate L, Wasserman Edward A
El Seashore Hall, Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1111-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196745.
We studied categorization in pigeons, using carefully controlled photographs. Within daily sessions, 4 pigeons had to classify each of 32 photographs into either its proper basic-level category (cars, chairs, flowers, or people; four-key forced choice procedure) or its proper superordinate-level category (natural or artificial; two-key forced choice procedure). The pigeons successfully classified the same stimuli at both levels. Overall, the pigeons learned the basic discrimination more quickly than the superordinate discrimination, but this difference was reliable only for artificial stimuli (cars and chairs), not for natural stimuli (flowers and people). The pigeons also exhibited reliable discrimination transfer to novel photographs, attesting to the open-endedness of these basic and superordinate categories.
我们使用经过精心控制的照片研究了鸽子的分类能力。在每日的实验环节中,4只鸽子必须将32张照片中的每一张归类到其恰当的基本层级类别(汽车、椅子、花朵或人物;四键强制选择程序)或其恰当的上级层级类别(自然或人造;双键强制选择程序)。鸽子在两个层级上都成功地对相同的刺激物进行了分类。总体而言,鸽子学习基本辨别比学习上级辨别更快,但这种差异仅在人造刺激物(汽车和椅子)上可靠,而在自然刺激物(花朵和人物)上不可靠。鸽子还表现出对新照片的可靠辨别迁移,证明了这些基本和上级类别的开放性。