Lazareva Olga F, Wasserman Edward A
Drake University.
Learn Motiv. 2009 May 1;40(2):132-146. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.10.003.
We (Lazareva, Freiburger, & Wasserman, 2004) previously trained four pigeons to classify color photographs into their basic-level categories (cars, chairs, flowers, or people) or into their superordinate-level categories (natural or artificial). Here, we found that brief stimulus durations had the most detrimental effect on the basic-level discrimination of natural stimuli by the same pigeons. Increasing the delay between stimulus presentation and choice responding had greater detrimental effect on the basic-level discrimination than the superordinate-level discrimination. These results suggest that basic-level discriminations required longer stimulus durations and were more subject to forgetting than were superordinate-level discriminations. Additionally, categorization of natural stimuli required longer stimulus durations than categorization of artificial stimuli, but only at the basic level. Together, these findings suggest that basic-level categorization may not always be superior to superordinate-level categorization and provide additional evidence of a dissociation between natural and artificial stimuli in pigeons' categorization.
我们(拉扎列娃、弗赖伯格和瓦瑟曼,2004年)之前训练了四只鸽子,让它们将彩色照片分类为基本类别(汽车、椅子、花朵或人物)或上级类别(自然或人造)。在此,我们发现短暂的刺激持续时间对同一只鸽子对自然刺激的基本水平辨别产生的不利影响最大。增加刺激呈现与选择反应之间的延迟,对基本水平辨别产生的不利影响比对上级水平辨别产生的不利影响更大。这些结果表明,基本水平辨别需要更长的刺激持续时间,并且比上级水平辨别更容易受到遗忘的影响。此外,自然刺激的分类比人造刺激的分类需要更长的刺激持续时间,但仅在基本水平上如此。总之,这些发现表明基本水平分类可能并不总是优于上级水平分类,并为鸽子分类中自然刺激和人造刺激之间的分离提供了额外证据。