Suppr超能文献

刺激持续时间和选择延迟对鸽子视觉分类的影响。

Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.

作者信息

Lazareva Olga F, Wasserman Edward A

机构信息

Drake University.

出版信息

Learn Motiv. 2009 May 1;40(2):132-146. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.10.003.

Abstract

We (Lazareva, Freiburger, & Wasserman, 2004) previously trained four pigeons to classify color photographs into their basic-level categories (cars, chairs, flowers, or people) or into their superordinate-level categories (natural or artificial). Here, we found that brief stimulus durations had the most detrimental effect on the basic-level discrimination of natural stimuli by the same pigeons. Increasing the delay between stimulus presentation and choice responding had greater detrimental effect on the basic-level discrimination than the superordinate-level discrimination. These results suggest that basic-level discriminations required longer stimulus durations and were more subject to forgetting than were superordinate-level discriminations. Additionally, categorization of natural stimuli required longer stimulus durations than categorization of artificial stimuli, but only at the basic level. Together, these findings suggest that basic-level categorization may not always be superior to superordinate-level categorization and provide additional evidence of a dissociation between natural and artificial stimuli in pigeons' categorization.

摘要

我们(拉扎列娃、弗赖伯格和瓦瑟曼,2004年)之前训练了四只鸽子,让它们将彩色照片分类为基本类别(汽车、椅子、花朵或人物)或上级类别(自然或人造)。在此,我们发现短暂的刺激持续时间对同一只鸽子对自然刺激的基本水平辨别产生的不利影响最大。增加刺激呈现与选择反应之间的延迟,对基本水平辨别产生的不利影响比对上级水平辨别产生的不利影响更大。这些结果表明,基本水平辨别需要更长的刺激持续时间,并且比上级水平辨别更容易受到遗忘的影响。此外,自然刺激的分类比人造刺激的分类需要更长的刺激持续时间,但仅在基本水平上如此。总之,这些发现表明基本水平分类可能并不总是优于上级水平分类,并为鸽子分类中自然刺激和人造刺激之间的分离提供了额外证据。

相似文献

1
Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.
Learn Motiv. 2009 May 1;40(2):132-146. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.10.003.
2
Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
3
Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1111-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196745.
4
Effect of between-category similarity on basic level superiority in pigeons.
Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
5
Scene gist categorization by pigeons.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):162-77. doi: 10.1037/xan0000014.
7
Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
8
9
Feature predictiveness and selective attention in pigeons' categorization learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):231-242. doi: 10.1037/xan0000146.

引用本文的文献

1
Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study.
Vet Med (Auckl). 2017 Oct 26;8:69-76. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S148594. eCollection 2017.
2
Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.
Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Oct 13;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00122. eCollection 2014.
3
Effect of between-category similarity on basic level superiority in pigeons.
Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrimination and categorization of photographs of natural objects by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):201-11. doi: 10.1007/s100710100106. Epub 2001 Oct 5.
2
A spurious category-specific visual agnosia for living things in normal human and nonhuman primates.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Winter;5(1):118-28. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.118.
3
Neuropsychological and neuroimaging perspectives on conceptual knowledge: an introduction.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):195-212. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000050.
4
High-order concept formation in the pigeon.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):475-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-475.
5
Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
6
Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1111-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196745.
7
Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: a versatile and affordable computerized touchscreen system.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):355-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03195582.
8
Electrophysiological correlates of object categorization: back to basics.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Aug;20(3):415-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.013.
9
Levels of abstraction in orangutan (Pongo abelii) categorization.
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Mar;118(1):3-13. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.1.3.
10
COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.
Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):549-51. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.549.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验