• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable.使用医生特定的处方偏好作为工具变量来评估短期药物效果。
Epidemiology. 2006 May;17(3):268-75. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000193606.58671.c5.
2
The proportion of all previous patients was a potential instrument for patients' actual prescriptions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.所有既往患者的比例是患者实际开具非甾体抗炎药处方的一个潜在工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
3
Instantaneous preference was a stronger instrumental variable than 3- and 6-month prescribing preference for NSAIDs.对于非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),即时偏好是比3个月和6个月的处方偏好更强的工具变量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;61(12):1285-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 May 20.
4
COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of gastrointestinal tract complications and myocardial infarction: an instrumental variable analysis.COX-2 选择性非甾体抗炎药与胃肠道并发症和心肌梗死风险:工具变量分析。
Epidemiology. 2013 May;24(3):352-62. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318289e024.
5
Evaluating the validity of an instrumental variable study of neuroleptics: can between-physician differences in prescribing patterns be used to estimate treatment effects?评估抗精神病药物工具变量研究的有效性:医生处方模式的个体差异能否用于估计治疗效果?
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S116-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318070c057.
6
Instrumental variable analysis of secondary pharmacoepidemiologic data.二级药物流行病学数据的工具变量分析
Epidemiology. 2006 Jul;17(4):373-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000222026.42077.ee.
7
The missing cause approach to unmeasured confounding in pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学中未测量混杂因素的缺失原因方法。
Stat Med. 2016 Mar 30;35(7):1001-16. doi: 10.1002/sim.6818. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Instrumental variable analysis in the context of dichotomous outcome and exposure with a numerical experiment in pharmacoepidemiology.二分类结局和暴露情形下工具变量分析:药物流行病学中的数值实验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0513-y.
9
Reducing the variance of the prescribing preference-based instrumental variable estimates of the treatment effect.降低处方偏好工具变量估计治疗效果的方差。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug 15;174(4):494-502. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr057. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
10
Physicians' prescribing preferences were a potential instrument for patients' actual prescriptions of antidepressants.医生的处方偏好可能成为患者实际开出抗抑郁药处方的一个影响因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Doubly robust machine learning-based estimation methods for instrumental variables with an application to surgical care for cholecystitis.基于双重稳健机器学习的工具变量估计方法及其在胆囊炎外科护理中的应用
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2024 Sep 24. doi: 10.1093/jrsssa/qnae089.
2
Does treatment of adolescent depression reduce risk of later psychosis: A quasi-experimental study of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment in a total population cohort.青少年抑郁症治疗能否降低日后患精神病的风险:一项针对全人群队列中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗的准实验研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 25;68(1):e82. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10050.
3
The impacts of Liverpool Citizen's Advice on Prescription (CAP) on mental health outcomes- an Instrumental Variable (IV) approach.利物浦公民咨询局对处方(CAP)对心理健康结果的影响——一种工具变量(IV)方法。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 22;30:101785. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101785. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Effect of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for knee osteoarthritis on the rates of subsequent knee replacement and post-operative outcomes: a national cohort study of England.关节内注射皮质类固醇治疗膝关节骨关节炎对后续膝关节置换率及术后结局的影响:一项英格兰全国队列研究
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04000-6.
5
Effect of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis on the subsequent use of pain medications: a UK CPRD cohort study.关节内注射皮质类固醇治疗骨关节炎对后续使用止痛药物的影响:一项英国全科医学研究数据库队列研究
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jun 1;64(6):3832-3841. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf126.
6
Penicillin allergy as an instrumental variable for estimating antibiotic effects on resistance.青霉素过敏作为估计抗生素对耐药性影响的工具变量。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 27;16(1):1088. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56287-x.
7
Reading and conducting instrumental variable studies: guide, glossary, and checklist.阅读和实施工具变量研究:指南、词汇表和检查表。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 14;387:e078093. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078093.
8
Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.比较工具变量在丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮或美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍中的分配效果。
Epidemiology. 2024 Mar 1;35(2):218-231. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001697. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
9
The Association between Direct Oral Anticoagulants Prescribing Behavior and Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Outcomes: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of Real-World Data.直接口服抗凝剂处方行为与非瓣膜性心房颤动结局之间的关联:真实世界数据的工具变量分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 20;12(22):7190. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227190.
10
Pharmacoepidemiology in pregnancy: analysis protocol for an observational cohort study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.孕期药物流行病学:英国临床实践研究数据链观察性队列研究的分析方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Jan 12;7:12. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17523.1. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Confounding by indication: the case of calcium channel blockers.混杂因素指示:钙通道阻滞剂的案例。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2000 Jan;9(1):37-41. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(200001/02)9:1<37::AID-PDS471>3.0.CO;2-U.
2
A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics.医疗保健利用数据库在治疗学流行病学研究中的应用综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):323-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.012.
3
A Medicare database review found that physician preferences increasingly outweighed patient characteristics as determinants of first-time prescriptions for COX-2 inhibitors.一项医疗保险数据库审查发现,在决定首次开具COX - 2抑制剂处方时,医生的偏好越来越超过患者特征的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.002.
4
Appropriateness of NSAID and Coxib prescribing for patients with osteoarthritis by primary care physicians in Ontario: results from the CANOAR study.安大略省初级保健医生为骨关节炎患者开具非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和环氧化酶-2抑制剂(Coxib)的合理性:CANOAR研究结果
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 1):742-50.
5
Adjusting for unmeasured confounders in pharmacoepidemiologic claims data using external information: the example of COX2 inhibitors and myocardial infarction.利用外部信息对药物流行病学索赔数据中未测量的混杂因素进行调整:以COX2抑制剂与心肌梗死为例。
Epidemiology. 2005 Jan;16(1):17-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147164.11879.b5.
6
When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?观察性研究何时能与随机试验一样可信?
Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1728-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16261-2.
7
Risk assessment of drugs, biologics and therapeutic devices: present and future issues.药物、生物制品和治疗器械的风险评估:当前与未来问题
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Dec;12(8):653-62. doi: 10.1002/pds.859.
8
Was breast conserving surgery underutilized for early stage breast cancer? Instrumental variables evidence for stage II patients from Iowa.早期乳腺癌保乳手术的应用是否不足?来自爱荷华州II期患者的工具变量证据。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1385-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00184.x.
9
Determinants of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor prescribing: are patient or physician characteristics more important?选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂处方的决定因素:患者特征还是医生特征更重要?
Am J Med. 2003 Dec 15;115(9):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.08.025.
10
Approaches to combat with confounding by indication in observational studies of intended drug effects.在预期药物效应的观察性研究中应对适应症混杂问题的方法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Oct-Nov;12(7):551-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.883.

使用医生特定的处方偏好作为工具变量来评估短期药物效果。

Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable.

作者信息

Brookhart M Alan, Wang Philip S, Solomon Daniel H, Schneeweiss Sebastian

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2006 May;17(3):268-75. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000193606.58671.c5.

DOI:10.1097/01.ede.0000193606.58671.c5
PMID:16617275
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2715942/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postmarketing observational studies of the safety and effectiveness of prescription medications are critically important but fraught with methodological problems. The data sources available for such research often lack information on indications and other important confounders for the drug exposure under study. Instrumental variable methods have been proposed as a potential approach to control confounding by indication in nonexperimental studies of treatment effects; however, good instruments are hard to find.

METHODS

We propose an instrument for use in pharmacoepidemiology that is based on a time-varying estimate of the prescribing physician's preference for one drug relative to a competing therapy. The use of this instrument is illustrated in a study comparing the effect of exposure to COX-2 inhibitors with nonselective, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications on gastrointestinal complications.

RESULTS

Using conventional multivariable regression adjusting for 17 potential confounders, we found no protective effect due to COX-2 use within 120 days from the initial exposure (risk difference = -0.06 per 100 patients; 95% confidence interval = -0.26 to 0.14). However, the proposed instrumental variable method attributed a protective effect to COX-2 exposure (-1.31 per 100 patients; -2.42 to -0.20) compatible with randomized trial results (-0.65 per 100 patients; -1.08 to -0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The instrumental variable method that we have proposed appears to have substantially reduced the bias due to unobserved confounding. However, more work needs to be done to understand the sensitivity of this approach to possible violations of the instrumental variable assumptions.

摘要

背景

对处方药安全性和有效性进行上市后观察性研究至关重要,但存在诸多方法学问题。此类研究可用的数据来源往往缺乏所研究药物暴露的适应症及其他重要混杂因素的信息。在治疗效果的非实验性研究中,工具变量法已被提议作为一种控制适应症混杂的潜在方法;然而,好的工具难以找到。

方法

我们提出一种用于药物流行病学的工具,该工具基于对开处方医生相对于竞争疗法对一种药物的偏好的时变估计。在一项比较接触COX - 2抑制剂与非选择性非甾体抗炎药对胃肠道并发症影响的研究中展示了该工具的使用。

结果

使用针对17个潜在混杂因素进行调整的传统多变量回归分析,我们发现在首次暴露后120天内使用COX - 2药物没有保护作用(风险差异 = 每100名患者 - 0.06;95%置信区间 = - 0.26至0.14)。然而,所提出的工具变量法将保护作用归因于COX - 2暴露(每100名患者 - 1.31; - 2.42至 - 0.20),这与随机试验结果(每100名患者 - 0.65; - 1.08至 - 0.22)相符。

结论

我们提出的工具变量法似乎已大幅减少了因未观察到的混杂因素导致的偏差。然而,还需要做更多工作来了解该方法对工具变量假设可能违反情况的敏感性。