• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伤口闭合方法的经济学比较:伤口闭合条与缝线及伤口粘合剂

Economic comparison of methods of wound closure: wound closure strips vs. sutures and wound adhesives.

作者信息

Zempsky William T, Zehrer Cindy L, Lyle Christopher T, Hedbloom Edwin C

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 282 Washington Street, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2005 Sep;2(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00130.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00130.x
PMID:16618333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7951558/
Abstract

Our objective was to review and assess the treatment of low-tension wounds and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of wound closure methods. We used a health economic model to estimate cost/closure of adhesive wound closure strips, tissue adhesives and sutures. The model incorporated cost-driving variables: application time, costs and the likelihood and costs of dehiscence and infection. The model was populated with variable estimates derived from the literature. Cost estimates and cosmetic results were compared. Parameter values were estimated using national healthcare and labour statistics. Sensitivity analyses were used to verify the results. Our analysis suggests that adhesive wound closure strips had the lowest average cost per laceration ($7.54), the lowest cost per infected laceration ($53.40) and the lowest cost per laceration with dehiscence ($25.40). The costs for sutures were $24.11, $69.91 and $41.91, respectively; the costs for tissue adhesives were $28.77, $74.68 and $46.68, respectively. The cosmetic outcome for all three treatments was equivalent. We conclude adhesive wound closure strips were both a cost-saving and a cost-effective alternative to sutures and tissue adhesives in the closure of low-tension lacerations.

摘要

我们的目标是回顾和评估低张力伤口的治疗方法,并评估伤口闭合方法的成本效益。我们使用健康经济模型来估计粘性伤口闭合条、组织粘合剂和缝线的每次闭合成本。该模型纳入了成本驱动变量:应用时间、成本以及裂开和感染的可能性及成本。模型中的变量估计值来自文献。比较了成本估计和美容效果。使用国家医疗保健和劳动力统计数据估计参数值。采用敏感性分析来验证结果。我们的分析表明,粘性伤口闭合条的每条撕裂伤平均成本最低(7.54美元),每例感染撕裂伤的成本最低(53.40美元),每例裂开撕裂伤的成本最低(25.40美元)。缝线的成本分别为24.11美元、69.91美元和41.91美元;组织粘合剂的成本分别为28.77美元、74.68美元和46.68美元。三种治疗方法的美容效果相当。我们得出结论,在闭合低张力撕裂伤方面,粘性伤口闭合条相对于缝线和组织粘合剂而言,既是一种节省成本的方法,也是一种具有成本效益的选择。

相似文献

1
Economic comparison of methods of wound closure: wound closure strips vs. sutures and wound adhesives.伤口闭合方法的经济学比较:伤口闭合条与缝线及伤口粘合剂
Int Wound J. 2005 Sep;2(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00130.x.
2
Tissue adhesives for simple traumatic lacerations.用于简单外伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):222-4. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.222.
3
Cost-consequence analysis comparing 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and suture for closure of simple lacerations: a randomized controlled trial.比较2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯组织粘合剂与缝线用于单纯性撕裂伤缝合的成本-后果分析:一项随机对照试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;53(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
4
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults.用于儿童和成人创伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003326.
5
Methods of laceration closure in the ED: A national perspective.ED 中裂伤缝合的方法:全国视角。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;38(6):1058-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158365. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Dermabond versus sutures for lacerated wound closure: a randomised controlled trial.
Hong Kong Med J. 2011 Dec;17 Suppl 6:4-8.
8
Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations.组织粘合剂与缝合修复小儿面部裂伤的经济学比较
J Pediatr. 1995 Jun;126(6):892-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70203-2.
9
Effect of Adhesive Strips and Dermal Sutures vs Dermal Sutures Only on Wound Closure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.粘贴条与皮肤缝线联合应用及单纯皮肤缝线对伤口闭合的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Aug;151(8):862-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0174.
10
Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.在猪实验中运用三维测量技术比较治疗皮肤裂伤的各种方法和材料
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 May;58(5):566-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000245135.58229.e7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adhesive Strips vs. Sutures in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Non-inferiority Analysis of Surgical Site Infections.腰椎融合术中粘贴条与缝线的比较:手术部位感染的非劣效性分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 11;17(4):e82065. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82065. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Clinical effect analysis of using medical glue versus conventional suturing to treat dog bite in children's maxillofacial region after negative pressure sealing drainage: A randomized trial.医用胶与传统缝合治疗儿童颌面部负压封闭引流后犬咬伤的临床效果分析:一项随机试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e34837. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034837.
3
A Recent Advance in the Closure of Skin Wounds on Fragile Skin.脆弱皮肤伤口闭合的最新进展
Case Rep Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 26;2021:6687961. doi: 10.1155/2021/6687961. eCollection 2021.
4
Mesentery-like steri-strip: a scarless drain fixation.肠系膜样手术缝线:一种无瘢痕引流固定法。
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):1020. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12258. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
5
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults.用于儿童和成人创伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003326.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled comparison of cosmetic outcomes of simple facial lacerations closed with Steri Strip Skin Closures or Dermabond tissue adhesive.使用皮肤免缝胶带或皮肤黏合剂闭合单纯面部裂伤的美容效果随机对照比较
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Aug;20(8):519-24. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000136068.45198.ae.
2
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2002年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2004 Mar 18(340):1-34.
3
A review of the literature on octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive.一篇关于氰基丙烯酸辛酯组织粘合剂的文献综述。
Am J Surg. 2004 Feb;187(2):238-48. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.017.
4
SUTURELESS SKIN CLOSURE. A CLINICAL TRIAL.无缝合皮肤闭合。一项临床试验。
Br Med J. 1963 Oct 26;2(5364):1027-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5364.1027.
5
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;10(2):110-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00027.x.
6
A randomised, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) with adhesive strips (Steristrips) for paediatric laceration repair.一项比较组织黏合剂(2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯)与黏合带(皮肤黏合带)用于小儿撕裂伤修复的随机对照试验。
Emerg Med J. 2002 Sep;19(5):405-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.5.405.
7
Closure of traumatic wounds without cleaning and suturing.不进行清洁和缝合的创伤伤口闭合。
Postgrad Med J. 2002 May;78(919):281-2. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.919.281.
8
Sewing up 'liquid stitches'. Dermabond ad campaign aims straight at consumer.
Mod Healthc. 2002 Jul 8;32(27):10.
9
Cosmetic outcome of scalp wound closure with staples in the pediatric emergency department: a prospective, randomized trial.小儿急诊科头皮伤口用吻合钉闭合的美容效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Jun;18(3):171-3. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200206000-00005.
10
The four S's of wound management: staples, sutures, Steri-Strips, and sticky stuff.
Holist Nurs Pract. 2002 Jan;16(2):80-8. doi: 10.1097/00004650-200201000-00010.