[Comparison of the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with K-wires and cannulated titanium screws].

AIM

The treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is usually treated operatively, but there is still no consensus about the method to be used. Up to a 30 degrees degree of slipping, the epiphysis is normally fixed in situ. The aim of our study was to compare the intermediate results after fixation in situ by K-wires versus cannulated titanium screws (Königsee-Implantate, Königsee-Aschau, Germany).

METHODS

In this study 46 patients with SCFE grade I and II and mostly chronic slipping of the epiphysis were included. After fixation in situ and, if necessary, careful, closed reposition, the patients were clinically and radiologically followed-up for one year. The clinical results were documented by the score adapted from Heyman and Herndon. Furthermore, MRI scans were done to evaluate the vitality of the epiphysis pre- and postoperatively, when titanium screws were used.

RESULTS

Clinical follow-up showed comparable results in the clinical scores after fixation by K-wires or cannulated titanium screws (3.13 +/- 1.02 vs. 3.10 +/- 1.01). After the treatment with titanium screws we saw a higher rate of abnormal gait (33.3 % vs. 19 %), a decreased rate of the positive Drehmann sign (10 % vs. 38 %) and a lower rate of revisions (16 % vs. 50 %) in comparison to K-wire fixation. After displacement of the K-wires we saw chondrolysis and prearthrosis in one case. Removal of the K-wires was done without any complications, while the removal of the cannulated titanium screws failed in 4 of 10 cases.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of SCFE with K-wires and cannulated titanium screws showed comparable results in the clinical follow-up. The treatment with cannulated titanium screws reduces the number of necessary revisions, but the removal of the material is hindered. Because of the lower rate of complications we prefer in the meantime the use of cannulated steel screws.