Omari A A A, Gamble C, Garner P
Countess of Chester Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Paediatric Department, Countess of Chester Health Park, Liverpool Road, Chester, Cheshire, UK, CH2 1UL.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005965.
The World Health Organization recommends artemether-lumefantrine, an expensive drug, as a treatment for uncomplicated malaria. We sought evidence of the superiority of the four-dose regimen over existing treatments.
To evaluate the four-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria.
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (October 2005), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2005), EMBASE (1988 to October 2005), LILACS (1982 to October 2005), conference proceedings, and reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in malaria research and the pharmaceutical company that manufactures artemether-lumefantrine.
Randomized controlled trials comparing four doses of artemether-lumefantrine with standard treatment regimens (single drug or combination), or six doses of artemether-lumefantrine, for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria.
Two authors independently applied inclusion criteria to potentially relevant trials, assessed trial quality, and extracted data, including adverse events. Total failure by day 28 (day 42 for sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and day 63 for mefloquine) was the primary outcome.
Seven trials (2057 participants) tested a four-dose regimen. More people tended to fail treatment with artemether-lumefantrine than with other drugs, including sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (247 participants, 1 trial), halofantrine (86 participants, 1 trial), and mefloquine (233 participants, 1 trial; difference statistically significant for mefloquine). When compared with chloroquine, artemether-lumefantrine was better in two trials (378 participants), but over 50% of the participants treated with chloroquine had total failure by day 28. Fewer people failed treatment with the six-dose regimen compared to the four-dose regimen (RR 7.71, 95% CI 2.99 to 19.88; 306 participants, 1 trial).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The four-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine seems to be less effective than regimens against which it has been tested. The six-dose regimen is superior to four-dose regimen.
世界卫生组织推荐使用蒿甲醚-本芴醇(一种昂贵的药物)治疗非复杂性疟疾。我们探寻了四剂疗法优于现有治疗方法的证据。
评估蒿甲醚-本芴醇四剂疗法治疗非复杂性恶性疟的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane传染病小组专业注册库(2005年10月)、Cochrane系统评价数据库(《Cochrane图书馆》2005年第3期)、医学索引数据库(1966年至2005年10月)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1988年至2005年10月)、拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学数据库(1982年至2005年10月)、会议论文集以及文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了疟疾研究领域的专家以及生产蒿甲醚-本芴醇的制药公司。
比较四剂蒿甲醚-本芴醇与标准治疗方案(单一药物或联合用药)或六剂蒿甲醚-本芴醇治疗非复杂性恶性疟的随机对照试验。
两位作者独立将纳入标准应用于潜在相关试验,评估试验质量,并提取数据,包括不良事件。第28天的总治疗失败(磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶为第42天,甲氟喹为第63天)是主要结局。
七项试验(2057名参与者)测试了四剂疗法。与其他药物相比,接受蒿甲醚-本芴醇治疗的人更易出现治疗失败,这些药物包括磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(247名参与者,1项试验)、卤泛群(86名参与者,1项试验)和甲氟喹(233名参与者,1项试验;与甲氟喹相比差异有统计学意义)。与氯喹相比,在两项试验(378名参与者)中蒿甲醚-本芴醇效果更好,但超过50%接受氯喹治疗的参与者在第28天出现了总治疗失败。与四剂疗法相比,接受六剂疗法治疗失败的人数更少(相对危险度7.71,95%可信区间2.99至19.88;306名参与者,1项试验)。
蒿甲醚-本芴醇四剂疗法似乎不如已测试过的其他疗法有效。六剂疗法优于四剂疗法。