• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解并尽量减少公共卫生研究中的流行病学偏倚。

Understanding and minimizing epidemiologic bias in public health research.

作者信息

Choi Bernard C K, Pak Anita W P

机构信息

Public Health Agency of Canada, Government of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96(4):284-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405165.

DOI:10.1007/BF03405165
PMID:16625797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6976244/
Abstract

Awareness of potential biases is important for both researchers and policy-makers in public health: for researchers when designing and conducting studies, and for policy-makers when reading study reports and making decisions. This paper explains the meaning and importance of epidemiologic bias in public health and discusses how it arises and what can be done to minimize it. Examples of counting participants in a meeting, to which many policy-makers can relate, are used throughout the paper to illustrate bias in general, random error and systematic error, the effect of sample size, the three main categories of bias (selection, information and confounding), stratification and mathematical modeling.

摘要

认识到潜在偏差对于公共卫生领域的研究人员和政策制定者都很重要

对于研究人员而言,在设计和开展研究时需要注意;对于政策制定者而言,在阅读研究报告和做出决策时需要注意。本文解释了公共卫生领域中流行病学偏差的含义和重要性,并讨论了偏差是如何产生的以及如何将其降至最低。本文通篇使用了许多政策制定者都能联想到的会议参会人数统计示例,来说明一般偏差、随机误差和系统误差、样本量的影响、偏差的三大主要类别(选择、信息和混杂)、分层以及数学建模。

相似文献

1
Understanding and minimizing epidemiologic bias in public health research.理解并尽量减少公共卫生研究中的流行病学偏倚。
Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96(4):284-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405165.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.比较效果研究中选择偏倚与混杂偏倚的辨别
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):e23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000011.
4
Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference.复合处理与因果推断的可转移性。
Epidemiology. 2011 May;22(3):368-77. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182109296.
5
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
6
Understanding and identifying bias and confounding in the medical literature.
South Med J. 2008 Dec;101(12):1240-5. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818860c0.
7
Reducing bias in pelvic floor disorders research: using directed acyclic graphs as an aid.减少盆底功能障碍研究中的偏倚:使用有向无环图作为辅助。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Jan;31(1):115-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.21183. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
8
[Sample selection in epidemiologic studies].[流行病学研究中的样本选择]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2002;56(3):489-98.
9
Bias in clinical epidemiological study designs.临床流行病学研究设计中的偏倚。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2013 Jan-Feb;41(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
10
Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.流行病学研究:解读中的陷阱。
Dialogues Contracept. 1995 Winter;4(5):5-6, 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns and determinants of healthcare utilization and medication use before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and India.在 COVID-19 危机之前和期间,阿富汗、孟加拉国和印度的医疗保健利用和药物使用模式及决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10789-4.
2
Questionnaire Survey of Burnout Amongst Dentists in Singapore.新加坡牙医职业倦怠问卷调查报告
Int Dent J. 2022 Apr;72(2):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.08.054. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
How is rating of perceived capacity related to VO and what is VO at onset of training?感知能力评分与摄氧量(VO)有怎样的关系,训练开始时的摄氧量是多少?
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 Jul 6;3(1):e000232. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000232. eCollection 2017.
4
Selection bias in population-based cancer case-control studies due to incomplete sampling frame coverage.由于抽样框架覆盖不完整导致基于人群的癌症病例对照研究中的选择偏倚。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jun;21(6):881-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1066. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
5
Assessing generalisability through the use of disease registers: findings from a diabetes cohort study.利用疾病登记评估普遍性:来自糖尿病队列研究的发现。
BMJ Open. 2011 Aug 27;1(1):e000078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000078.
6
Vision for a global registry of anticipated public health studies.关于建立全球预期公共卫生研究登记处的设想。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.081711. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A catalog of biases in questionnaires.问卷中的偏差目录。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jan;2(1):A13. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
2
Bias.偏差。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Aug;58(8):635-41. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.008466.
3
Look before you leap: stratify before you standardize.三思而后行:在标准化之前先分层。
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jun 15;149(12):1087-96. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009762.
4
Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.癌症研究中的统计方法。第一卷——病例对照研究的分析
IARC Sci Publ. 1980(32):5-338.
5
Methodological issues in case-control studies IV: Validity and efficiency of various analysis strategies for continuous variables using the unconditional logistic regression model.
Int J Epidemiol. 1984 Dec;13(4):526-32. doi: 10.1093/ije/13.4.526.
6
Statistical methods in cancer research. IARC Workshop 25-27 May 1983.癌症研究中的统计方法。1983年5月25日至27日国际癌症研究机构研讨会
IARC Sci Publ. 1987(82):1-406.
7
Classification, direction, and prevention of bias in epidemiologic research.流行病学研究中偏倚的分类、方向及预防
J Occup Med. 1992 Mar;34(3):265-71. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199203000-00010.
8
Bias in analytic research.分析性研究中的偏倚
J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):51-63. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2.