• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Understanding and identifying bias and confounding in the medical literature.

作者信息

Hsu Joe L, Banerjee Dipanjan, Kuschner Ware G

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

South Med J. 2008 Dec;101(12):1240-5. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818860c0.

DOI:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818860c0
PMID:19005435
Abstract

Bias and confounding are types of error that may be encountered in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of research data. Bias and confounding may result in erroneous research conclusions with adverse consequences for patients and health care providers. In this article, we provide clinician-friendly descriptions and examples of bias (including surveillance, information, selection, lead, length, and publication) and confounding. The purpose of the article is to help clinicians to recognize two important sources of error in research and in turn to help clinicians to assess the validity and generalizability of a research report.

摘要

相似文献

1
Understanding and identifying bias and confounding in the medical literature.
South Med J. 2008 Dec;101(12):1240-5. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818860c0.
2
Reducing bias in pelvic floor disorders research: using directed acyclic graphs as an aid.减少盆底功能障碍研究中的偏倚:使用有向无环图作为辅助。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Jan;31(1):115-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.21183. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
3
Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 2: What should researchers make of persistent controversies about the odds ratio?不可 collapsibility、混杂因素和稀疏数据偏差。第 2 部分:对于比值比的持续争议,研究人员应该如何看待?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research.科学图谱分析刻画了生物医学研究中的 235 种偏差。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1205-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
5
Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 1: The oddities of odds.不可压缩性、混杂因素和稀疏数据偏差。第1部分:比值的奇特之处。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:178-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
6
Definitions of Bias in Clinical Research.临床研究中的偏倚定义。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:35-52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_3.
7
Bias in clinical research.临床研究中的偏倚
Kidney Int. 2008 Jan;73(2):148-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002648. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
8
Using Instrumental Variables to Address Bias From Unobserved Confounders.使用工具变量解决未观察到的混杂因素导致的偏差。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 4;321(21):2124-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5646.
9
Understanding and minimizing epidemiologic bias in public health research.理解并尽量减少公共卫生研究中的流行病学偏倚。
Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96(4):284-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405165.
10
Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.比较效果研究中选择偏倚与混杂偏倚的辨别
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):e23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000011.

引用本文的文献

1
Prime time to resuscitate clinical medicine and kill diagnostic greed?复苏临床医学并遏制诊断贪婪的黄金时机?
Singapore Med J. 2016 Sep;57(9):473-5. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016151.
2
Oral antibiotic treatment and long-term outcomes of Lyme facial nerve palsy.口服抗生素治疗莱姆病性面神经麻痹的长期疗效。
Infection. 2011 Jun;39(3):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s15010-011-0107-7. Epub 2011 Apr 27.