• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于抽样框架覆盖不完整导致基于人群的癌症病例对照研究中的选择偏倚。

Selection bias in population-based cancer case-control studies due to incomplete sampling frame coverage.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Middleton, WI 53562, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jun;21(6):881-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1066. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1066
PMID:22490319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3645306/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of individuals are choosing to opt out of population-based sampling frames due to privacy concerns. This is especially a problem in the selection of controls for case-control studies, as the cases often arise from relatively complete population-based registries, whereas control selection requires a sampling frame. If opt out is also related to risk factors, bias can arise.

METHODS

We linked breast cancer cases who reported having a valid driver's license from the 2004-2008 Wisconsin women's health study (N = 2,988) with a master list of licensed drivers from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WDOT). This master list excludes Wisconsin drivers that requested their information not be sold by the state. Multivariate-adjusted selection probability ratios (SPR) were calculated to estimate potential bias when using this driver's license sampling frame to select controls.

RESULTS

A total of 962 cases (32%) had opted out of the WDOT sampling frame. Cases age <40 (SPR = 0.90), income either unreported (SPR = 0.89) or greater than $50,000 (SPR = 0.94), lower parity (SPR = 0.96 per one-child decrease), and hormone use (SPR = 0.93) were significantly less likely to be covered by the WDOT sampling frame (α = 0.05 level).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate the potential for selection bias due to differential opt out between various demographic and behavioral subgroups of controls. As selection bias may differ by exposure and study base, the assessment of potential bias needs to be ongoing.

IMPACT

SPRs can be used to predict the direction of bias when cases and controls stem from different sampling frames in population-based case-control studies.

摘要

背景

由于隐私问题,越来越多的人选择退出基于人群的抽样框架。这在病例对照研究中选择对照尤其成问题,因为病例通常来自相对完整的基于人群的登记处,而对照选择需要抽样框架。如果退出也与危险因素有关,则可能会出现偏差。

方法

我们将报告拥有有效驾照的乳腺癌病例(来自 2004-2008 年威斯康星州妇女健康研究)与威斯康星州交通部(WDOT)的驾照主列表联系起来。此主列表排除了要求州不销售其信息的威斯康星州驾驶员。计算了多变量调整后的选择概率比(SPR),以估计使用此驾照抽样框架选择对照时潜在的偏差。

结果

共有 962 例病例(32%)选择退出 WDOT 抽样框架。年龄<40 岁的病例(SPR = 0.90),收入未报告(SPR = 0.89)或超过 50,000 美元(SPR = 0.94),低胎次(SPR =每减少一个孩子 0.96)和激素使用(SPR = 0.93)的可能性明显较低,而 WDOT 抽样框架则涵盖了这些病例(α= 0.05 水平)。

结论

我们的结果表明,由于控制组中各种人口统计学和行为亚组之间的退出存在差异,因此存在选择偏差的可能性。由于选择偏差可能因暴露和研究基础而异,因此需要持续评估潜在的偏差。

影响

SPR 可用于预测在基于人群的病例对照研究中,病例和对照来自不同抽样框架时的偏倚方向。

相似文献

1
Selection bias in population-based cancer case-control studies due to incomplete sampling frame coverage.由于抽样框架覆盖不完整导致基于人群的癌症病例对照研究中的选择偏倚。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jun;21(6):881-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1066. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
2
Availability of driver's license master lists for use in government-sponsored public health research.驾驶员驾照主列表在政府资助的公共卫生研究中的可用性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1414-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr018. Epub 2011 May 13.
3
Analysis of selection bias in a case-control study of renal adenocarcinoma.
Epidemiology. 1990 Nov;1(6):441-7. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199011000-00005.
4
Socioeconomic factors influence selection and participation in a population-based case-control study of head and neck cancer in Scotland.社会经济因素影响了苏格兰一项基于人群的头颈癌病例对照研究中的选择和参与情况。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.012. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
5
The driver's license list as a population-based sampling frame in Iowa.爱荷华州以驾照列表作为基于人群的抽样框架。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Mar;84(3):469-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.3.469.
6
Field-based random sampling without a sampling frame: control selection for a case-control study in rural Africa.无抽样框架的现场随机抽样:非洲农村病例对照研究的对照选择
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Sep-Oct;95(5):481-3. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(01)90009-4.
7
8
Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study.抽样框架导致的选择偏倚:电话簿和选民名册与逐户人口普查的比较:蓝山眼研究结果
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Apr;21(2):127-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01671.x.
9
Breast cancer risk and oral contraceptive use: results from a large case-control study.乳腺癌风险与口服避孕药的使用:一项大型病例对照研究的结果
Epidemiology. 1991 Sep;2(5):353-8. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199109000-00007.
10
Case-control studies on risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: how does the sampling of the cases and controls affect the results?慢性阻塞性肺疾病危险因素的病例对照研究:病例与对照的抽样如何影响结果?
Clin Respir J. 2010 Apr;4(2):89-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2009.00154.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection Bias in Real-World Data Studies Used to Support Health Technology Assessments: A Case Study in Metastatic Cancer.真实世界数据研究在用于支持卫生技术评估中的选择偏倚:转移性癌症案例研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 6;30(2):1945-1953. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020151.
2
Use of empiric methods to inform prostate cancer health disparities: Comparison of neighborhood-wide association study "hits" in black and white men.运用实证方法了解前列腺癌健康差距:黑人和白人男性全社区关联研究“命中”结果的比较。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):1949-1957. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32734. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
Recruitment via social media: advantages and potential biases.

本文引用的文献

1
Hypertension and risk of renal cell carcinoma among white and black Americans.白人和黑人美国人的高血压与肾细胞癌风险。
Epidemiology. 2011 Nov;22(6):797-804. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182300720.
2
Availability of driver's license master lists for use in government-sponsored public health research.驾驶员驾照主列表在政府资助的公共卫生研究中的可用性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1414-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr018. Epub 2011 May 13.
3
Effects of birth order and maternal age on breast cancer risk: modification by whether women had been breast-fed.
通过社交媒体进行招募:优势与潜在偏差。
Digit Health. 2019 Aug 6;5:2055207619867223. doi: 10.1177/2055207619867223. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Administration of oral fluoroquinolone and the risk of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A nationwide population-based study in Korea.口服氟喹诺酮类药物与孔源性视网膜脱离风险:韩国一项全国基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195563. eCollection 2018.
5
The impact of interleukin-10 (IL-10) gene 4 polymorphisms on peripheral blood IL-10 variation and prostate cancer risk based on published studies.基于已发表研究探讨白细胞介素-10(IL-10)基因4多态性对外周血IL-10变异及前列腺癌风险的影响。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 11;8(28):45994-46005. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17522.
6
[Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].[临床研究中的系统误差:全面综述]
Ophthalmologe. 2017 Mar;114(3):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0471-5.
7
[Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].[临床研究中的系统误差:全面调查]
Z Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;76(1):71-82. doi: 10.1007/s00393-016-0253-5.
8
Using propensity scores to reduce case-control selection bias.使用倾向评分来减少病例对照选择偏倚。
Epidemiology. 2012 Sep;23(5):772-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182628365.
出生顺序和母亲年龄对乳腺癌风险的影响:是否曾母乳喂养的调节作用。
Epidemiology. 2008 May;19(3):417-23. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816a1cff.
4
The HIPAA authorization form and effects on survey response rates, nonresponse bias, and data quality: a randomized community study.《健康保险流通与责任法案》授权书及其对调查回复率、无应答偏差和数据质量的影响:一项随机社区研究。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10):959-65. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31805468b0.
5
Survey research methods in evaluation and case-control studies.评估和病例对照研究中的调查研究方法。
Stat Med. 2007 Apr 15;26(8):1675-87. doi: 10.1002/sim.2796.
6
Nonresponse error in injury-risk surveys.伤害风险调查中的无应答误差。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov;31(5):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
7
Understanding and minimizing epidemiologic bias in public health research.理解并尽量减少公共卫生研究中的流行病学偏倚。
Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96(4):284-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405165.
8
Genetic variation and willingness to participate in epidemiologic research: data from three studies.基因变异与参与流行病学研究的意愿:三项研究的数据
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Oct;14(10):2449-53. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0463.
9
Driver's license and voter registration lists as population-based sampling frames for rural African Americans.驾照和选民登记名单作为非裔美国农村人口的抽样框架。
Ann Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;11(6):385-8. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00230-7.
10
Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases.偏差敏感性分析的基本方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1107-16.