Thomas John, Turner Shannon R, Nelson Rendon C, Paulson Erik K
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1419-22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1914.
This retrospective study was conducted to determine the incidence of sepsis at our institution after percutaneous drainage of a hepatic abscess.
Thirty-three patients with a hepatic abscess treated using percutaneous aspiration and drainage from 1995 to 2000 were identified from a search of the interventional database. The patients' charts and CT images were reviewed independently by two radiologists for clinical presentation, relevant medical history, pre- and postprocedure antibiotic regimens, and clinical course after percutaneous aspiration and drainage. The preprocedure images were reviewed for the location and morphology of the abscess. The procedure details including percutaneous approach, guidance technique, catheter size, and immediate postprocedure complications were reviewed.
Of the 33 patients, 14 patients underwent only needle aspiration of the abscess. In six (43%) of these 14 patients, the abscesses resolved with aspiration and appropriate antibiotic treatment alone. Eight (57%) of the patients who had aspiration of the abscess initially went on to have drainage catheters placed within a 72-hr period. Nineteen patients had drainage catheters placed from the onset. Of these, 17 patients (89%) had abscess resolution. Of the 27 patients who had catheters placed, a total of seven patients (26%) developed clinical symptoms of septicemia after catheter placement, but all patients, at least initially, responded to supportive treatment. Two patients died from septicemia 3-6 weeks after the procedure. None of the patients who underwent aspiration only developed postprocedure septicemia.
After placement of a percutaneous drainage catheter in a hepatic abscess, there is a significant risk (26%) of postprocedure sepsis. Although it appears to be a random and unpredictable event in our small series, interventional radiologists and referring physicians should be aware of the risk of sepsis after percutaneous drainage of hepatic abscess.
本回顾性研究旨在确定我院肝脓肿经皮引流术后脓毒症的发生率。
通过检索介入数据库,确定了1995年至2000年间33例采用经皮穿刺抽吸及引流治疗肝脓肿的患者。两名放射科医生独立查阅患者病历及CT图像,以了解临床表现、相关病史、术前及术后抗生素治疗方案以及经皮穿刺抽吸及引流后的临床病程。回顾术前图像以了解脓肿的位置和形态。查阅手术细节,包括经皮入路、引导技术、导管尺寸及术后即刻并发症。
33例患者中,14例仅接受了脓肿穿刺抽吸。在这14例患者中的6例(43%),脓肿通过抽吸及适当的抗生素治疗得以消退。最初接受脓肿穿刺抽吸的患者中有8例(57%)在72小时内放置了引流导管。19例患者从一开始就放置了引流导管。其中,17例患者(89%)脓肿消退。在放置导管的27例患者中,共有7例患者(26%)在放置导管后出现败血症临床症状,但所有患者至少在最初对支持治疗有反应。2例患者在术后3 - 6周死于败血症。仅接受穿刺抽吸的患者均未发生术后败血症。
肝脓肿经皮引流导管放置后,有显著的术后脓毒症风险(26%)。尽管在我们的小样本系列中这似乎是一个随机且不可预测的事件,但介入放射科医生和转诊医生应意识到肝脓肿经皮引流后脓毒症的风险。