Monk Terri G
Department of Anesthesiology, Durham VA Hospital, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Mar;20(1):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.10.004.
The era of research evaluating clinical outcomes associated with processed electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring began with the first randomized trial of bispectral index monitoring (BIS) performed as part of the clearance process for approving routine clinical use of the BIS monitor by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Subsequent to this initial investigation, numerous other clinical investigations have demonstrated that the use of processed EEG monitors as an additional method of patient assessment and an aid to anaesthetic dosing can decrease anaesthetic usage and hasten recovery times. Because of the presumed association between anaesthetic effect and EEG changes, it is not surprising that the additional research has focused on the impact of processed EEG monitoring on postoperative outcomes and perioperative safety especially the prevention of intraoperative awareness.
评估与处理后的脑电图(EEG)监测相关临床结果的研究时代始于美国食品药品监督管理局批准BIS监测仪常规临床使用的审批过程中进行的第一项双谱指数监测(BIS)随机试验。在这项初步研究之后,许多其他临床研究表明,使用处理后的EEG监测仪作为患者评估的额外方法和辅助麻醉给药,可以减少麻醉剂用量并缩短恢复时间。由于推测麻醉效果与EEG变化之间存在关联,因此额外的研究聚焦于处理后的EEG监测对术后结果和围手术期安全性的影响,尤其是预防术中知晓,这并不奇怪。