Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):975-984. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.042. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Several devices record and interpret patient brain activity via electroencephalogram (EEG) to aid physician assessment of anaesthetic effect. Few studies have compared EEG monitors on data from the same patient. Here, we describe a set-up to simultaneously compare the performance of three processed EEG monitors using pre-recorded EEG signals from older surgical patients.
A playback system was designed to replay EEG signals into three different commercially available EEG monitors. We could then simultaneously calculate indices from the SedLine® Root (Masimo Inc., Irvine, CA, USA; patient state index [PSI]), bilateral BIS VISTA™ (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA; bispectral index [BIS]), and Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor with the Entropy™ Module (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA; E-entropy index [Entropy]). We tested the ability of each system to distinguish activity before anaesthesia administration (pre-med) and before/after loss of responsiveness (LOR), and to detect suppression incidences in EEG recorded from older surgical patients receiving beta-adrenergic blockers. We show examples of processed EEG monitor output tested on 29 EEG recordings from older surgical patients.
All monitors showed significantly different indices and high effect sizes between comparisons pre-med to after LOR and before/after LOR. Both PSI and BIS showed the highest percentage of deeply anaesthetised indices during periods with suppression ratios (SRs) > 25%. We observed significant negative correlations between percentage of suppression and indices for all monitors (at SR >5%).
All monitors distinguished EEG changes occurring before anaesthesia administration and during LOR. The PSI and BIS best detected suppressed periods. Our results suggest that the PSI and BIS monitors might be preferable for older patients with risk factors for intraoperative awareness or increased sensitivity to anaesthesia.
有几种设备通过脑电图(EEG)记录和解释患者的脑活动,以帮助医生评估麻醉效果。很少有研究比较过来自同一患者的数据的 EEG 监测器。在这里,我们描述了一种设置,可同时使用来自老年手术患者的预记录 EEG 信号比较三种经过处理的 EEG 监测器的性能。
设计了一个回放系统,将 EEG 信号重播到三个不同的市售 EEG 监测器中。然后,我们可以同时从 SedLine®Root(Masimo Inc.,加利福尼亚州欧文,美国;患者状态指数[PSI])、双侧 BIS VISTA™(Medtronic Inc.,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯,美国;双谱指数[BIS])和 Datex Ohmeda S/5 监视器与 Entropy™模块(GE Healthcare,伊利诺伊州芝加哥,美国;熵指数[Entropy])计算指数。我们测试了每个系统区分麻醉前(预麻醉)和失去反应性前后(LOR)活动的能力,以及检测接受β肾上腺素阻滞剂的老年手术患者记录的 EEG 中抑制发生率的能力。我们展示了经过处理的 EEG 监视器输出的示例,该监视器在 29 个来自老年手术患者的 EEG 记录上进行了测试。
所有监测器在预麻醉到 LOR 后和 LOR 前后的比较中均显示出明显不同的指数和高效应量。PSI 和 BIS 在抑制比(SR)> 25%的时期均显示出最高百分比的深度麻醉指数。我们观察到所有监测器的抑制百分比与指数之间存在显著负相关(在 SR > 5%时)。
所有监测器都区分了麻醉前和 LOR 期间发生的 EEG 变化。PSI 和 BIS 最好检测到抑制期。我们的结果表明,PSI 和 BIS 监测器可能更适合具有术中意识风险因素或对麻醉更敏感的老年患者。