• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应时间与时间顺序判断之间的分离:一种扩散模型方法。

Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: a diffusion model approach.

作者信息

Miller Jeff, Schwarz Wolfgang

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):394-412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.394.

DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.394
PMID:16634678
Abstract

A diffusion model for simple reaction time (RT) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks was developed to account for a commonly observed dissociation between these 2 tasks: Most stimulus manipulations (e.g., intensity) have larger effects in RT tasks than in TOJ tasks. The model assumes that a detection criterion determines the level of sensory evidence needed to conclude that a stimulus has been presented. Analysis of the performance that would be achieved with different possible criterion settings revealed that performance was optimal with a lower criterion setting for the TOJ task than for the RT task. In addition, the model predicts that effects of stimulus manipulations should increase with the size of the detection criterion. Thus, the model suggests that commonly observed dissociations between RT and TOJ tasks may simply be due to performance optimization in the face of conflicting task demands.

摘要

开发了一种用于简单反应时间(RT)和时间顺序判断(TOJ)任务的扩散模型,以解释这两项任务之间常见的分离现象:大多数刺激操作(如强度)在RT任务中的影响比在TOJ任务中更大。该模型假设,一个检测标准决定了得出刺激已呈现所需的感觉证据水平。对不同可能标准设置下的表现进行分析后发现,TOJ任务的标准设置低于RT任务时,表现最佳。此外,该模型预测,刺激操作的影响应随检测标准的大小而增加。因此,该模型表明,RT和TOJ任务之间常见的分离现象可能仅仅是由于面对相互冲突的任务需求时的表现优化。

相似文献

1
Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: a diffusion model approach.反应时间与时间顺序判断之间的分离:一种扩散模型方法。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):394-412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.394.
2
Attentional bias toward low-intensity stimuli: an explanation for the intensity dissociation between reaction time and temporal order judgment?对低强度刺激的注意偏向:反应时间与时间顺序判断之间强度分离的一种解释?
Conscious Cogn. 2000 Sep;9(3):435-56. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2000.0461.
3
[Reaction time and temporal serial judgment: corroboration or dissociation?].[反应时间与时间序列判断:确证还是分离?]
Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1992;39(4):621-45.
4
Temporal order judgment and simple reaction times: evidence for a common processing system.时间顺序判断与简单反应时间:关于一个共同处理系统的证据。
J Vis. 2007 Apr 27;7(6):11. doi: 10.1167/7.6.11.
5
On the relationship between the redundant signals effect and temporal order judgments: parametric data and a new model.关于冗余信号效应与时间顺序判断之间的关系:参数数据与新模型
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Jun;32(3):558-73. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.558.
6
Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects.同时性和时间顺序判断表现出不同的反应时间和训练效果。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 12;11(1):e0145926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145926. eCollection 2016.
7
Comparing temporal order judgments and choice reaction time tasks as indices of exogenous spatial cuing.比较时间顺序判断和选择反应时任务作为外源性空间线索指标的情况。
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Nov 30;166(2):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
8
A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility.刺激-刺激与刺激-反应兼容性的并行分布式处理模型
Cogn Psychol. 1999 May;38(3):386-432. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0703.
9
Converging evidence that common timing processes underlie temporal-order and simultaneity judgments: a model-based analysis.越来越多的证据表明,共同的时间处理过程是时间顺序和同时性判断的基础:基于模型的分析。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1750-66. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0869-6.
10
Somatosensory prior entry assessed with temporal order judgments and simultaneity judgments.通过时间顺序判断和同时性判断评估体感先入。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1586-603. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0117-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal order judgment of multisensory stimuli in rat and human.大鼠和人类多感官刺激的时间顺序判断
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jan 12;16:1070452. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1070452. eCollection 2022.
2
Revisiting the color-motion asynchrony.重新审视颜色-运动失同步现象。
J Vis. 2023 Jan 3;23(1):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.1.6.
3
The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect.内隐主体感不是一种知觉效应,而是一种判断效应。
Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01066-x. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
Poking Left To Be Right? A Model-Based Analysis of Temporal Order Judged by Mice.向左戳是为了正确?基于模型的小鼠对时间顺序判断的分析
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun 30;14(2):39-50. doi: 10.5709/acp-0237-0. eCollection 2018.
5
Neural Correlates of the Time Marker for the Perception of Event Timing.事件时间感知的时间标记的神经关联。
eNeuro. 2016 Sep 21;3(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0144-16.2016. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
6
Voluntary movement affects simultaneous perception of auditory and tactile stimuli presented to a non-moving body part.自愿运动影响对呈现给非运动身体部位的听觉和触觉刺激的同时感知。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 13;6:33336. doi: 10.1038/srep33336.
7
Optimal Perceived Timing: Integrating Sensory Information with Dynamically Updated Expectations.最佳感知时机:将感官信息与动态更新的预期相结合。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 7;6:28563. doi: 10.1038/srep28563.
8
A Roving Dual-Presentation Simultaneity-Judgment Task to Estimate the Point of Subjective Simultaneity.一种用于估计主观同时性点的移动双呈现同时性判断任务。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 24;7:416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00416. eCollection 2016.
9
The simultaneous perception of auditory-tactile stimuli in voluntary movement.自主运动中听觉-触觉刺激的同时感知。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 24;6:1429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01429. eCollection 2015.
10
Defense of the brain time view.脑时间观的辩护。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 4;6:1350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01350. eCollection 2015.