Póvoa Pedro, Coelho Luís, Almeida Eduardo, Fernandes Antero, Mealha Rui, Moreira Pedro, Sabino Henrique
Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R63. doi: 10.1186/cc4892.
Manifestations of sepsis are sensitive but are poorly specific of infection. Our aim was to assess the value of daily measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP), temperature and white cell count (WCC) in the early identification of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections.
We undertook a prospective observational cohort study (14 month). All patients admitted for > or =72 hours (n = 181) were divided into an infected (n = 35) and a noninfected group (n = 28). Infected patients had a documented ICU-acquired infection and were not receiving antibiotics for at least 5 days before diagnosis. Noninfected patients never received antibiotics and were discharged alive. The progression of CRP, temperature and WCC from day -5 to day 0 (day of infection diagnosis or of ICU discharge) was analyzed. Patients were divided into four patterns of CRP course according to a cutoff value for infection diagnosis of 8.7 mg/dl: pattern A, day 0 CRP >8.7 mg/dl and, in the previous days, at least once below the cutoff; pattern B, CRP always >8.7 mg/dl; pattern C, day 0 CRP < or =8.7 mg/dl and, in the previous days, at least once above the cutoff; and pattern D, CRP always < or =8.7 mg/dl.
CRP and the temperature time-course showed a significant increase in infected patients, whereas in noninfected it remained almost unchanged (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The area under the curve for the maximum daily CRP variation in infection prediction was 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.752-0.933). A maximum daily CRP variation >4.1 mg/dl was a good marker of infection prediction (sensitivity 92.1%, specificity 71.4%), and in combination with a CRP concentration >8.7 mg/dl the discriminative power increased even further (sensitivity 92.1%, specificity 82.1%). Infection was diagnosed in 92% and 90% of patients with patterns A and B, respectively, and in only two patients with patterns C and D (P < 0.001).
Daily CRP monitoring and the recognition of the CRP pattern could be useful in the prediction of ICU-acquired infections. Patients presenting maximum daily CRP variation >4.1 mg/dl plus a CRP level >8.7 mg/dl had an 88% risk of infection.
脓毒症的表现较为敏感,但对感染的特异性较差。我们的目的是评估每日测量C反应蛋白(CRP)、体温和白细胞计数(WCC)在早期识别重症监护病房(ICU)获得性感染中的价值。
我们进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究(为期14个月)。所有住院时间≥72小时的患者(n = 181)被分为感染组(n = 35)和非感染组(n = 28)。感染患者有记录在案的ICU获得性感染,且在诊断前至少5天未接受抗生素治疗。非感染患者从未接受过抗生素治疗且存活出院。分析了从第-5天到第0天(感染诊断日或ICU出院日)CRP、体温和WCC的变化情况。根据感染诊断的临界值8.7mg/dl,将患者分为四种CRP病程模式:A模式,第0天CRP>8.7mg/dl,且在前几天至少有一次低于临界值;B模式,CRP始终>8.7mg/dl;C模式,第0天CRP≤8.7mg/dl,且在前几天至少有一次高于临界值;D模式,CRP始终≤8.7mg/dl。
感染患者的CRP和体温时间进程显示显著升高,而非感染患者几乎保持不变(分别为P < 0.001和P < 0.001)。感染预测中每日最大CRP变化曲线下面积为0.86(95%置信区间:0.752 - 0.933)。每日最大CRP变化>4.1mg/dl是感染预测的良好指标(敏感性92.1%,特异性71.4%),并且与CRP浓度>8.7mg/dl联合使用时,鉴别能力进一步提高(敏感性92.1%,特异性82.1%)。A模式和B模式的患者中分别有92%和90%被诊断为感染,而C模式和D模式的患者中只有2例被诊断为感染(P < 0.001)。
每日CRP监测以及对CRP模式的识别可能有助于预测ICU获得性感染。每日最大CRP变化>4.1mg/dl且CRP水平>8.7mg/dl的患者感染风险为88%。