• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查质量指标的时间趋势。

Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway.

Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Feb;4(1):110-20. doi: 10.1177/2050640615570147. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1177/2050640615570147
PMID:26966531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4766538/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is considerable variation in the quality of colonoscopy performance. The Norwegian quality assurance programme Gastronet registers outpatient colonoscopies performed in Norwegian endoscopy centres. The aim of Gastronet is long-term improvement of endoscopist and centre performance by annual feedback of performance data.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to perform an analysis of trends of quality indicators for colonoscopy in Gastronet.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 73,522 outpatient colonoscopies from 73 endoscopists at 25 endoscopy centres from 2003 to 2012. We used multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for relevant variables to determine annual trends of three performance indicators: caecum intubation rate, pain during the procedure, and detection rate of polyps ≥5 mm.

RESULTS

The proportion of severely painful colonoscopies decreased from 14.8% to 9.2% (relative risk reduction of 38%; OR = 0.92 per year in Gastronet; 95% CI 0.86-1.00; p = 0.045). Caecal intubation (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.94-1.04; p = 0.6) and polyp detection (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.99-1.07; p = 0.15) remained unchanged during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain at colonoscopy showed a significant decrease during years of Gastronet participation while caecal intubation and polyp detection remained unchanged - independent of the use of sedation and/or analgesics and level of endoscopist experience. This may be due to the Gastronet audit, but effects of improved endoscopy technology cannot be excluded.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查的质量存在很大差异。挪威质量保证计划 Gastronet 登记了在挪威内镜中心进行的门诊结肠镜检查。Gastronet 的目的是通过每年反馈绩效数据,长期提高内镜医师和中心的绩效。

目的

本文旨在分析 Gastronet 中结肠镜检查质量指标的趋势。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2003 年至 2012 年间,来自 25 个内镜中心的 73 名内镜医师的 73522 例门诊结肠镜检查。我们使用多变量逻辑回归,结合相关变量调整,确定了三个绩效指标的年度趋势:盲肠插管率、检查过程中的疼痛程度和 5mm 以上息肉的检出率。

结果

严重疼痛结肠镜检查的比例从 14.8%降至 9.2%(相对风险降低 38%;Gastronet 中每年的 OR 值为 0.92;95%CI 0.86-1.00;p=0.045)。盲肠插管(OR=0.99;95%CI 0.94-1.04;p=0.6)和息肉检出率(OR=1.03;95%CI 0.99-1.07;p=0.15)在研究期间保持不变。

结论

在 Gastronet 参与期间,结肠镜检查疼痛显著下降,而盲肠插管和息肉检出率保持不变-独立于镇静和/或镇痛的使用以及内镜医师经验水平。这可能是 Gastronet 审核的结果,但不能排除内镜技术改进的影响。

相似文献

1
Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy.结肠镜检查质量指标的时间趋势。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Feb;4(1):110-20. doi: 10.1177/2050640615570147. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
2
The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres.挪威胃肠内镜网络项目:挪威14个中心结肠镜检查的持续质量改进
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;41(4):481-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520500265208.
3
Endoscopy assistants influence the quality of colonoscopy.内镜助手影响结肠镜检查质量。
Endoscopy. 2018 Sep;50(9):871-877. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-101706. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
4
Sustaining the vitality of colonoscopy quality improvement programmes over time. Experience from the Norwegian Gastronet programme.随着时间推移维持结肠镜检查质量改进项目的活力。来自挪威胃肠网项目的经验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;45(3):362-9. doi: 10.3109/00365520903497106.
5
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
An explorative study from the Norwegian Quality Register Gastronet comparing self-estimated versus registered quality in colonoscopy performance.一项来自挪威胃肠内镜质量登记处的探索性研究,比较了结肠镜检查操作中自我评估的质量与登记的质量。
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E326-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100904. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
7
Colonoscopy audit over 10 years--what can be learnt?十年的结肠镜检查审计——能学到什么?
N Z Med J. 2013 Sep 13;126(1382):25-35.
8
[Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].[结肠镜检查的质量指标:一家医院内镜医师之间息肉检出率的差异]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(24):A4219.
9
Gastronet survey on the use of one- or two-person technique for colonoscopy insertion.胃肠镜插入单人或双人技术使用的 Gastronet 调查。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun 14;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-73.
10
Variation of quality of colonoscopy in Italy over five years: a nation-wide observational study.意大利结肠镜检查质量五年间的变化:一项全国性观察性研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.下消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Apr;5(3):309-334. doi: 10.1177/2050640617700014. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain.在因锐角弯曲或疼痛导致结肠镜检查不完全后,使用带有被动弯曲功能的小口径结肠镜进行结肠镜检查。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4171-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3016-2. Epub 2013 May 31.
2
[Pain in connection with colonoscopy in Norway].[挪威结肠镜检查相关的疼痛]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 May 28;133(10):1074-8. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.1467.
3
Colonoscopy: Sliding into the depths of sedation--is this what we want?结肠镜检查:陷入深度镇静——这是我们想要的吗?
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jun;10(6):325-6. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.71. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
4
Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.季度报告卡对结肠镜检查质量指标的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.水交换增强潜在困难结肠镜检查中的盲肠插管。有腹部或盆腔手术史的非镇静患者:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):767-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
6
Development and validation of a nurse-assessed patient comfort score for colonoscopy.开发并验证一种用于结肠镜检查的护士评估患者舒适度评分。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb;77(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.003.
7
Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).结肠镜筛查质量:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明
Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):957-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325686. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
8
The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK.全国结肠镜检查审计:对英国结肠镜检查质量和安全性的全国性评估。
Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):242-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301848. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
9
Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.使用超微结肠镜进行结肠镜筛查时减轻疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2012 Aug;44(8):740-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309755. Epub 2012 May 23.
10
Unsedated colonoscopy: A neverending story.非镇静结肠镜检查:一个永无止境的故事。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr 16;4(4):137-41. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i4.137.