Vaaler A E, Morken G, Fløvig J C, Iversen V C, Linaker O M
Ostmarka Psychiatric Department, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2006;60(2):144-9. doi: 10.1080/08039480600583472.
Psychiatric acute units use different levels of segregation to satisfy needs for containment and decrease in sensory input for behaviourally disturbed patients. Controlled studies evaluating the effects of the procedure are lacking. The aim of the present study was to compare effects in acutely admitted patients with the use of a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) and not in a psychiatric acute department. In a naturalistic study, one group of consecutively referred patients had access only to the PICU, the other group to the whole acute unit. Data were obtained for 56 and 62 patients using several scales. There were significant differences in reduction of behaviour associated with imminent, threatening incidents (Broset Violence Checklist), and actual number of such incidents (Staff Observation Aggression Scale-Revised) in favour of the group that was treated in a PICU. The principles of patient segregation in PICUs have favourable effects on behaviours associated with and the actual numbers of violent and threatening incidents.
精神科急症病房采用不同程度的隔离措施,以满足对行为紊乱患者的管控需求,并减少其感官输入。目前尚缺乏评估该措施效果的对照研究。本研究的目的是比较急性入院患者在使用精神科重症监护病房(PICU)和未使用精神科急症病房时的效果。在一项自然主义研究中,一组连续转诊的患者只能进入PICU,另一组则可进入整个急症病房。使用多个量表收集了56名和62名患者的数据。在与即将发生的威胁性事件相关的行为减少(布罗塞特暴力清单)以及此类事件的实际数量(工作人员观察攻击量表修订版)方面,存在显著差异,有利于在PICU接受治疗的组。PICU中患者隔离的原则对与暴力和威胁事件相关的行为以及此类事件的实际数量有积极影响。