• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自下而上:追溯四项基于健康的社会运动对健康和社会政策的影响。

From the bottom up: tracing the impact of four health-based social movements on health and social policies.

作者信息

Keefe Robert H, Lane Sandra D, Swarts Heidi J

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Buffalo, State University of New York, 14260-1050, USA.

出版信息

J Health Soc Policy. 2006;21(3):55-69. doi: 10.1300/J045v21n03_04.

DOI:10.1300/J045v21n03_04
PMID:16635945
Abstract

Although health-based social movements organized by grassroots activists have a rich history in impacting health and social policy, few systematic studies have addressed their policy change efforts or effectiveness. In this article, the authors trace how four health-based social movements-the women's health movement, ACT UP, breast cancer, and needle exchange-influenced health and social policy legislation. The activists' efforts wrested control of "authoritative knowledge" that had once been the sole domain of "experts" with advanced medical training. They used this knowledge to empower "average" people with medical information, promote self help and engage in civil disobedience, which led to changes in healthcare delivery, drug testing and approval, and increased research funds for HIV/AIDS, breast cancer, and needle exchange. The activists' efforts led to other health-based social movements that are currently, or will become, issues for health and social policy analysts in the future.

摘要

尽管由基层活动家组织的基于健康的社会运动在影响健康和社会政策方面有着丰富的历史,但很少有系统的研究探讨过它们在政策变革方面的努力或成效。在本文中,作者追溯了四个基于健康的社会运动——妇女健康运动、艾滋病解放力量联盟(ACT UP)、乳腺癌运动和针头交换运动——是如何影响健康和社会政策立法的。活动家们的努力夺回了曾经是受过高级医学培训的“专家”独家领域的“权威知识”控制权。他们利用这些知识赋予“普通”民众医学信息,促进自助并参与公民抗命,这导致了医疗服务、药物测试与审批方面的变革,以及用于艾滋病、乳腺癌和针头交换的研究资金增加。活动家们的努力引发了其他基于健康的社会运动,这些运动目前或未来将成为健康和社会政策分析师关注的问题。

相似文献

1
From the bottom up: tracing the impact of four health-based social movements on health and social policies.自下而上:追溯四项基于健康的社会运动对健康和社会政策的影响。
J Health Soc Policy. 2006;21(3):55-69. doi: 10.1300/J045v21n03_04.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
The role of policy in community pharmacies' response to injection-drug use: results of a nationwide Canadian survey.政策在社区药房应对注射吸毒问题中的作用:加拿大全国性调查结果
AIDS Public Policy J. 1996 Summer;11(2):78-88.
4
Framing as a cultural resource in health social movements: funding activism and the breast cancer movement in the US 1990-1993.作为健康社会运动中的一种文化资源的框架构建:1990 - 1993年美国的资助行动主义与乳腺癌运动
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):820-44. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00420.x.
5
Disease categories and disease kinships: classification practices in the U.S. environmental breast cancer movement.
Med Anthropol. 2006 Apr-Jun;25(2):101-38. doi: 10.1080/01459740600657543.
6
Public health, not social warfare: a public health approach to illegal drug policy.公共卫生,而非社会战争:非法毒品政策的公共卫生方法
J Public Health Policy. 1991 Autumn;12(3):278-323.
7
Women and AIDS in south and South-East Asia: the challenge and the response.南亚和东南亚地区的女性与艾滋病:挑战与应对措施
World Health Stat Q. 1996;49(2):94-105.
8
CLSCs in Quebec: thirty years of community action.魁北克的社区卫生服务中心:三十年的社区行动。
Soc Work Public Health. 2008;23(4):89-106. doi: 10.1080/19371910802162413.
9
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
10
Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health.具身健康运动:健康领域社会运动的新方法。
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Jan;26(1):50-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Challenge of Exposing and Ending Health Inequalities through Social and Policy Change: Canadian Experiences.通过社会和政策变革消除健康不平等的挑战:加拿大的经验
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2023 Apr;53(2):130-145. doi: 10.1177/27551938221148376. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
2
Movement Pandemic Adaptability: Health Inequity and Advocacy among Latinx Immigrant and Indigenous Peoples.运动大流行适应能力:拉丁裔移民和原住民中的健康不平等和倡导。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 23;19(15):8981. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158981.
3
Individual health behaviours to combat the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from HIV socio-behavioural science.
个人健康行为以应对 COVID-19 大流行:来自 HIV 社会行为科学的经验教训。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Aug;24(8):e25771. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25771.
4
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) Communities and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Call to Break the Cycle of Structural Barriers.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ+)群体与 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行:打破结构性障碍循环的呼吁。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 1;224(11):1810-1820. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab392.
5
Meeting the Challenge of a More Person-centered Future for US Healthcare.迎接美国医疗保健更加以人为本的未来挑战。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2016 Jan;5(1):51-60. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2015.085. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
6
Trauma-Informed Social Policy: A Conceptual Framework for Policy Analysis and Advocacy.创伤知情社会政策:政策分析与倡导的概念框架
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):223-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302970. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Can a food justice movement improve nutrition and health? A case study of the emerging food movement in New York City.食品正义运动能否改善营养和健康?以纽约市新兴食品运动为例。
J Urban Health. 2011 Aug;88(4):623-36. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9598-x.
8
Use of electronic technologies to promote community and personal health for individuals unconnected to health care systems.利用电子技术促进与医疗保健系统无关联的个人的社区和个人健康。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Jul;101(7):1163-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300003. Epub 2011 May 12.