McKnight Michelynn
School of Library and Information Science, Louisiana State University, 269 Coates Hall, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):145-51.
An observational study describes on-duty nurses' informative behaviors from the perspective of library and information science, rather than patient care,. It reveals their information sources, the kinds of information they seek, and their barriers to information acquisition.
Participant observation and in-context interviews were used to record in detail fifty hours of the information behavior of a purposive sample of on-duty critical care nurses on twenty-bed critical care unit in a community hospital. The investigator used rigorous ethnographic methods-including open, in vivo, and axial coding--to analyze the resulting rich textual data.
The nurses' information behavior centered on the patient, seeking information from people, the patient record, and other systems. The nurses mostly used patient-specific information, but they also used some social and logistic information. They occasionally sought knowledge-based information. Barriers to information acquisition included illegible handwriting, difficult navigation of online systems, equipment failure, unavailable people, social protocols, and mistakes caused by people multitasking while working with multiple complex systems. Although the participating nurses understood and respected evidence-based practice, many believed that taking time to read published information on duty was not only difficult, but perhaps also ethically wrong. They said that a personal information service available to them at all hours of the day or night would be very useful.
On-duty critical care nursing is a patient-centric information activity. A major implication of this study for librarians is that immediate professional reference service--including quality and quantity filtering-may be more useful to on-duty nurses than do-it-yourself searching and traditional document delivery are.
一项观察性研究从图书馆与信息科学的角度而非患者护理的角度描述了值班护士的信息行为。该研究揭示了她们的信息来源、所寻求的信息种类以及信息获取的障碍。
采用参与观察法和情境访谈法,详细记录了一家社区医院拥有20张床位的重症监护病房中,经过 purposive 抽样选取的值班重症监护护士50小时的信息行为。研究者运用严格的人种志方法——包括开放式编码、原位编码和轴心式编码——来分析由此产生的丰富文本数据。
护士的信息行为以患者为中心,从人员、患者记录和其他系统中获取信息。护士们大多使用特定于患者的信息,但也使用一些社会和后勤信息。她们偶尔会寻求基于知识的信息。信息获取的障碍包括字迹模糊、在线系统导航困难、设备故障、人员无法获取、社会规范以及人们在操作多个复杂系统时因一心多用而导致的错误。尽管参与研究的护士理解并尊重循证实践,但许多人认为在值班时花时间阅读已发表的信息不仅困难,而且可能在伦理上也是错误的。她们表示,全天候为她们提供的个人信息服务会非常有用。
值班重症监护护理是以患者为中心的信息活动。本研究对图书馆员的一个主要启示是,即时专业参考服务——包括质量和数量筛选——对值班护士可能比自助搜索和传统文献传递更有用。