Saw Seang-Mei, Shankar Anoop, Tan Say-Beng, Taylor Hugh, Tan Donald T H, Stone Richard A, Wong Tien-Yin
Department of Community, Occupational, and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 May;47(5):1839-44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1081.
To determine the risk factors of incident myopia in a school-based cohort study in Singaporean children.
A 3-year prospective cohort study was conducted in Singaporean school children aged 7 to 9 years in three schools at entry. Chinese children without myopia at baseline (n = 994) were included in the analysis. The main outcome was incident myopia, defined as spherical equivalent (SE) at least -0.75 D based on cycloplegic autorefraction. Other definitions of incident myopia, at least -0.5 D and at least -1.0 D, were also assessed.
After controlling for school, age, gender, income, reading in books per week and intelligence quotient (IQ) test scores, we found the relative risk (RR) of incident myopia defined as -0.75 D to be 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-2.04) for two versus no myopic parents. The multivariate RR of myopia for IQ in the third versus first tertile was 1.50 (95% CI, 1.19-1.89). However, the RR of incident myopia was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.97-1.05) for every unit increase in books read per week. Similar results were obtained with definitions of -0.5 and -1.0 D for incident myopia.
These data provide new prospective evidence of essential links between parental myopia, IQ scores and subsequent myopia development. However, reading in books per week was not associated with incident myopia.
在一项针对新加坡儿童的基于学校的队列研究中确定新发近视的风险因素。
对三所学校中7至9岁的新加坡在校儿童进行了一项为期3年的前瞻性队列研究。纳入分析的是基线时无近视的中国儿童(n = 994)。主要结局是新发近视,根据散瞳验光后的等效球镜度数(SE)至少为-0.75 D来定义。还评估了新发近视的其他定义,即至少为-0.5 D和至少为-1.0 D。
在控制了学校、年龄、性别、收入、每周读书量和智商(IQ)测试分数后,我们发现对于有两名近视父母与无近视父母的情况,定义为-0.75 D的新发近视的相对风险(RR)为1.55(95%置信区间[CI] 1.18 - 2.04)。智商处于第三分位数与第一分位数相比,近视的多变量RR为1.50(95% CI,1.19 - 1.89)。然而,每周读书量每增加一个单位,新发近视的RR为1.01(95% CI,0.97 - 1.05)。对于新发近视定义为-0.5 D和-1.0 D的情况,也得到了类似结果。
这些数据为父母近视、智商分数与后续近视发展之间的重要联系提供了新的前瞻性证据。然而,每周读书量与新发近视无关。