Vida Stephen, Galbaud du Fort Guillaume, Kakuma Ritsuko, Arsenault Louise, Platt Robert W, Wolfson Christina M
Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2006 Dec;18(4):681-700. doi: 10.1017/S1041610206003310. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
To examine delirium, chronic medical problems and sociodemographic factors as predictors of activities of daily living (ADL), basic ADL (BADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL).
A prospective cohort study of four groups of elderly patients examined in the emergency department (ED): those with delirium, dementia, neither, and both. All were aged 66 years or older and living at home. Delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method and dementia with the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly. Demographic variables and chronic medical problems were ascertained with questionnaires. Outcome was ADL at 6, 12 and 18 months, measured with the ADL subscale of the Older Americans Resources and Services instrument.
Univariate analyses suggested significantly poorer ADL, particularly IADL, at 18 months in the delirium versus the non-delirium group, in the absence of dementia only. Statistically significant independent predictors of poorer ADL at 18 months in the non-dementia groups were poorer initial ADL, stroke, Parkinson's disease, hypertension and female sex. Independent predictors of poorer BADL at 18 months in the non-dementia groups were poorer initial BADL, Parkinson's disease, stroke, cancer, colds/sinusitis/laryngitis, female sex and hypertension. Independent predictors of poorer IADL at 18 months in the non-dementia groups were poorer initial IADL, stroke, never-married status, colds/sinusitis/laryngitis, arthritis and hypertension, with Parkinson's disease showing a non-significant but numerically large regression coefficient.
Rather than finding delirium to be a predictor of poorer functional outcome among survivors, we found an interaction between delirium and dementia and several plausible confounders, primarily chronic medical problems, although we cannot rule out the effect of misclassification or survivor bias.
研究谵妄、慢性疾病问题及社会人口学因素作为日常生活活动(ADL)、基本日常生活活动(BADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)预测指标的情况。
对在急诊科检查的四组老年患者进行前瞻性队列研究,这四组患者分别为:患有谵妄的患者、患有痴呆症的患者、既无谵妄也无痴呆症的患者以及两者皆有的患者。所有患者年龄均在66岁及以上且居家生活。使用混乱评估法评估谵妄,使用老年人认知能力下降知情者问卷评估痴呆症。通过问卷调查确定人口统计学变量和慢性疾病问题。结局指标为6个月、12个月和18个月时的ADL,采用美国老年人资源与服务工具的ADL子量表进行测量。
单因素分析表明,仅在无痴呆症的情况下,谵妄组在18个月时的ADL,尤其是IADL,明显比非谵妄组差。在非痴呆症组中,18个月时ADL较差的具有统计学意义的独立预测因素包括初始ADL较差、中风、帕金森病、高血压和女性。在非痴呆症组中,18个月时BADL较差的独立预测因素包括初始BADL较差、帕金森病、中风、癌症、感冒/鼻窦炎/喉炎、女性和高血压。在非痴呆症组中,18个月时IADL较差的独立预测因素包括初始IADL较差、中风、未婚状态、感冒/鼻窦炎/喉炎、关节炎和高血压,帕金森病的回归系数虽无统计学意义但数值较大。
我们并未发现谵妄是幸存者功能预后较差的预测指标,而是发现谵妄与痴呆症以及几个可能的混杂因素之间存在相互作用,主要是慢性疾病问题,尽管我们不能排除错误分类或幸存者偏差的影响。