• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年急诊医学中谵妄的识别:REDEEM 风险分层评分。

REcognizing DElirium in geriatric Emergency Medicine: The REDEEM risk stratification score.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;29(4):476-485. doi: 10.1111/acem.14423. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1111/acem.14423
PMID:34870884
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9050857/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to derive a risk score that uses variables available early during the emergency department (ED) encounter to identify high-risk geriatric patients who may benefit from delirium screening.

METHODS

This was an observational study of older adults age ≥ 75 years who presented to an academic ED and who were screened for delirium during their ED visit. Variable selection from candidate predictors was performed through a LASSO-penalized logistic regression. A risk score was derived from the final prediction model, and predictive accuracy characteristics were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

From the 967 eligible ED visits, delirium was detected in 107 (11.1%). The area under the curve for the REcognizing DElirium in Emergency Medicine (REDEEM) score was 0.901 (95% CI = 0.864-0.938). The REEDEM risk score included 10 different variables (seven based on triage information and three obtained during early history taking) with a score ranging from -3 to 66. Using an optimal cutoff of ≥11, we found a sensitivity of 84.1% (90 of 107 ED delirium patients, 95% CI = 75.5%-90.2%) and a specificity of 86.6% (745 of 860 non-ED delirium patients, 95% CI = 84.1%-88.8%). A lower cutoff of ≥5 was found to minimize false negatives with an improved sensitivity at 91.6% (98 of 107 ED delirium patients, 95% CI = 84.2%-95.8%).

CONCLUSION

A risk stratification score was derived with the potential to augment delirium recognition in geriatric ED patients. This has the potential to assist on delirium-targeted screening of high-risk patients in the ED. Validation of REDEEM, however, is needed prior to implementation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种风险评分系统,该系统利用急诊科(ED)就诊早期的变量来识别可能需要进行谵妄筛查的高风险老年患者。

方法

这是一项针对年龄≥75 岁的老年患者的观察性研究,这些患者在 ED 就诊期间接受了谵妄筛查。通过 LASSO 惩罚逻辑回归对候选预测因子进行变量选择。从最终预测模型中得出风险评分,并计算 95%置信区间(CI)的预测准确性特征。

结果

在 967 例符合条件的 ED 就诊中,107 例(11.1%)检测出谵妄。REcognizing DElirium in Emergency Medicine(REDEEM)评分的曲线下面积为 0.901(95%CI=0.864-0.938)。REDEEM 风险评分包括 10 个不同的变量(7 个基于分诊信息,3 个在早期病史采集时获得),评分范围为-3 至 66。使用最佳截断值≥11,我们发现敏感性为 84.1%(107 例 ED 谵妄患者中有 90 例,95%CI=75.5%-90.2%),特异性为 86.6%(860 例非 ED 谵妄患者中有 745 例,95%CI=84.1%-88.8%)。发现截断值较低(≥5)可以最大限度地减少假阴性,敏感性提高到 91.6%(107 例 ED 谵妄患者中有 98 例,95%CI=84.2%-95.8%)。

结论

开发了一种风险分层评分系统,有可能提高老年 ED 患者的谵妄识别能力。这有可能帮助在 ED 对高危患者进行谵妄针对性筛查。然而,在实施之前需要对 REDEEM 进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c81/9050857/b5780624d542/nihms-1763954-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c81/9050857/983aa7740a0c/nihms-1763954-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c81/9050857/ba36dc5b871a/nihms-1763954-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c81/9050857/b5780624d542/nihms-1763954-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c81/9050857/983aa7740a0c/nihms-1763954-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c81/9050857/ba36dc5b871a/nihms-1763954-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c81/9050857/b5780624d542/nihms-1763954-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
REcognizing DElirium in geriatric Emergency Medicine: The REDEEM risk stratification score.老年急诊医学中谵妄的识别:REDEEM 风险分层评分。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;29(4):476-485. doi: 10.1111/acem.14423. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
2
Delirium in older emergency department patients: recognition, risk factors, and psychomotor subtypes.老年急诊科患者的谵妄:识别、危险因素及精神运动亚型
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;16(3):193-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00339.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
3
Risk factors and risk stratification approaches for delirium screening: A Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0 systematic review.谵妄筛查的风险因素和风险分层方法:老年急诊指南 2.0 系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;31(10):969-984. doi: 10.1111/acem.14939. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Predictive Ability of a Serious Game to Identify Emergency Patients With Unrecognized Delirium.一款用于识别未识别出的谵妄急诊患者的严重游戏的预测能力。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Nov;67(11):2370-2375. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16095. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Delirium risk prediction, healthcare use and mortality of elderly adults in the emergency department.急诊科老年患者谵妄风险预测、医疗保健使用与死亡率。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Mar;62(3):462-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12692. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
6
Association of delirium with increased short-term mortality among older emergency department patients: A cohort study.谵妄与老年急诊科患者短期死亡率增加的相关性:一项队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;66:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.040. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
7
Predictors of delirium in older patients at the emergency department: a prospective multicentre derivation study.急诊科老年患者谵妄的预测因素:一项前瞻性多中心推导研究。
CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):330-336. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00004-8. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
8
Association between emergency department modifiable risk factors and subsequent delirium among hospitalized older adults.急诊科可调整风险因素与住院老年患者随后发生谵妄的关系。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.032. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
9
Improved detection of delirium, implementation and validation of the CAM-ICU in elderly Emergency Department patients.提高对老年急诊科患者谵妄的检测率,实施和验证 CAM-ICU。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(6):411-416. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000380.
10
The effect of mental status screening on the care of elderly emergency department patients.精神状态筛查对老年急诊科患者护理的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 May;41(5):678-84. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.152.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Test the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of iPREPARED; A Mobile Health Technology for Patients and Care Partners.一项试点随机对照临床试验,以测试iPREPARED的可行性、可接受性和可用性;一种面向患者和护理伙伴的移动健康技术。
Delirium Commun. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.56392/001c.127872.
2
Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.确定急性护理中成年患者谵妄预测的真实情况:一项范围综述
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 26;8(3):ooaf037. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf037. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Implementation of delirium screening in the emergency department: A qualitative study with early adopters.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors for Delirium in Older Adults in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急诊科老年患者谵妄的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;78(4):549-565. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
2
Predicting Delirium Risk Using an Automated Mayo Delirium Prediction Tool: Development and Validation of a Risk-Stratification Model.使用自动 Mayo 谵妄预测工具预测谵妄风险:风险分层模型的开发和验证。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 May;96(5):1229-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.08.049. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?
急诊科谵妄筛查的实施:对早期采用者的定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3753-3762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19188. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Risk of falls is associated with 30-day mortality among older adults in the emergency department.在急诊科,老年人跌倒风险与30天死亡率相关。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 May;79:122-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.020. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
5
Association of delirium with increased short-term mortality among older emergency department patients: A cohort study.谵妄与老年急诊科患者短期死亡率增加的相关性:一项队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;66:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.040. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
预后模型的外部验证:是什么、为什么、如何、何时以及何地?
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa188. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Delirium.谵妄。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Nov 12;6(1):90. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00223-4.
5
Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Emergency Medicine Settings: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement.急危重症医学环境中谵妄的预防、检测和治疗:老年急诊护理应用研究 (GEAR) 网络范围界定综述和共识声明。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;28(1):19-35. doi: 10.1111/acem.14166. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
6
Risk factors for delirium among older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review protocol.急诊科老年患者谵妄的危险因素:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e039175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039175.
7
Recognition, prevention, and treatment of delirium in emergency department: An evidence-based narrative review.急诊科谵妄的识别、预防和治疗:基于证据的叙述性综述。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):349-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158454. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
8
Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature.临床预测规则制定与评估的方法学标准:文献综述
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Aug 22;3:16. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0060-y. eCollection 2019.
9
Validation of the Brief Confusion Assessment Method for Screening Delirium in Elderly Medical Patients in a German Emergency Department.验证Brief 混乱评估方法在德国急诊老年患者中的应用,以筛查谵妄。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;25(11):1251-1262. doi: 10.1111/acem.13449. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient.老年住院患者谵妄预测模型的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e019223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019223.