Mohlman Jan, Carmin Cheryl N, Price Rebecca B
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Department of Psychology, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Mar;45(3):591-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.007. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
A small body of research suggests that socially anxious individuals show biases in interpreting the facial expressions of others. The current study included a clinically anxious sample in a speeded emotional card-sorting task in two conditions (baseline and threat) to investigate several hypothesized biases in interpretation. Following the threat manipulation, participants with generalized social anxiety disorders (GSADs) sorted angry cards with greater accuracy, but also evidenced a greater rate of neutral cards misclassified as angry, as compared to nonanxious controls. The controls showed the opposite pattern, sorting neutral cards with greater accuracy but also misclassifying a greater proportion of angry cards as neutral, as compared to GSADs. These effects were accounted for primarily by low-intensity angry cards. Results are consistent with previous studies showing a negative interpretive bias, and can be applied to the improvement of clinical interventions.
一小部分研究表明,社交焦虑个体在解读他人面部表情时存在偏差。当前的研究在两种条件(基线和威胁)下,对临床焦虑样本进行了快速情感卡片分类任务,以调查几种假设的解读偏差。在威胁操纵之后,与非焦虑对照组相比,患有广泛性社交焦虑障碍(GSAD)的参与者能更准确地对愤怒卡片进行分类,但也有更高比例的中性卡片被误分类为愤怒卡片。对照组则呈现相反的模式,与GSAD患者相比,他们能更准确地对中性卡片进行分类,但也有更大比例的愤怒卡片被误分类为中性卡片。这些效应主要由低强度愤怒卡片导致。研究结果与之前显示消极解读偏差的研究一致,可应用于改善临床干预。