Kobelt Peter, Goebel Miriam, Stengel Andreas, Schmidtmann Marco, van der Voort Ivo R, Tebbe Johannes J, Veh Rüdiger W, Klapp Burghard F, Wiedenmann Bertram, Wang Lixin, Taché Yvette, Mönnikes Hubert
Department of Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006 Oct;291(4):R903-13. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00681.2005. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
The interaction between ghrelin and bombesin or amylin administered intraperitoneally on food intake and brain neuronal activity was assessed by Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in nonfasted rats. Ghrelin (13 microg/kg ip) increased food intake compared with the vehicle group when measured at 30 min (g/kg: 3.66 +/- 0.80 vs. 1.68 +/- 0.42, P < 0.0087). Bombesin (8 microg/kg) injected intraperitoneally with ghrelin (13 microg/kg) blocked the orexigenic effect of ghrelin (1.18 +/- 0.41 g/kg, P < 0.0002). Bombesin alone (4 and 8 microg/kg ip) exerted a dose-related nonsignificant reduction of food intake (g/kg: 1.08 +/- 0.44, P > 0.45 and 0.55 +/- 0.34, P > 0.16, respectively). By contrast, ghrelin-induced stimulation of food intake (g/kg: 3.96 +/- 0.56 g/kg vs. vehicle 0.82 +/- 0.59, P < 0.004) was not altered by amylin (1 and 5 microg/kg ip) (g/kg: 4.37 +/- 1.12, P > 0.69, and 3.01 +/- 0.78, respectively, P > 0.37). Ghrelin increased the number of FLI-positive neurons/section in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) compared with vehicle (median: 42 vs. 19, P < 0.008). Bombesin alone (4 and 8 microg/kg ip) did not induce FLI neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) and coadministered with ghrelin did not alter ghrelin-induced FLI in the ARC. However, bombesin (8 microg/kg) with ghrelin significantly increased neuronal activity in the PVN approximately threefold compared with vehicle and approximately 1.5-fold compared with the ghrelin group. Bombesin (8 microg/kg) with ghrelin injected intraperitoneally induced Fos expression in 22.4 +/- 0.8% of CRF-immunoreactive neurons in the PVN. These results suggest that peripheral bombesin, unlike amylin, inhibits peripheral ghrelin induced food intake and enhances activation of CRF neurons in the PVN.
通过对非禁食大鼠的Fos样免疫反应性(FLI)评估腹腔注射胃饥饿素与蛙皮素或胰淀素之间对食物摄入和脑神经元活动的相互作用。与溶媒组相比,胃饥饿素(13μg/kg腹腔注射)在30分钟时测量食物摄入量增加(g/kg:3.66±0.80对1.68±0.42,P<0.0087)。腹腔注射蛙皮素(8μg/kg)与胃饥饿素(13μg/kg)可阻断胃饥饿素的促食作用(1.18±0.41g/kg,P<0.0002)。单独使用蛙皮素(4和8μg/kg腹腔注射)对食物摄入量有剂量相关的不显著减少(g/kg:1.08±0.44,P>0.45和0.55±0.34,P>0.16)。相比之下,胰淀素(1和5μg/kg腹腔注射)不改变胃饥饿素诱导的食物摄入增加(g/kg:3.96±0.56g/kg对溶媒0.82±0.59,P<0.004)(g/kg:分别为4.37±1.12,P>0.69和3.01±0.78,P>0.37)。与溶媒相比,胃饥饿素增加了弓状核(ARC)中FLI阳性神经元/切片的数量(中位数:42对19,P<0.008)。单独使用蛙皮素(4和8μg/kg腹腔注射)在下丘脑室旁核(PVN)中未诱导FLI神经元,与胃饥饿素共同给药也未改变胃饥饿素诱导的ARC中的FLI。然而,与溶媒相比,蛙皮素(8μg/kg)与胃饥饿素显著增加PVN中的神经元活动约三倍,与胃饥饿素组相比约1.5倍。腹腔注射蛙皮素(8μg/kg)与胃饥饿素在PVN中诱导22.4±0.8%的促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子免疫反应性神经元中的Fos表达。这些结果表明,与胰淀素不同,外周蛙皮素抑制外周胃饥饿素诱导的食物摄入并增强PVN中促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子神经元的激活。