• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用经济评估技术为水资源管理提供信息:对现有技术的调查与批判性评估及一项应用

Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application.

作者信息

Birol Ekin, Karousakis Katia, Koundouri Phoebe

机构信息

Department of Land Economics and Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2PH, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2006 Jul 15;365(1-3):105-22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.032. Epub 2006 May 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.032
PMID:16647102
Abstract

The need for economic analysis for the design and implementation of efficient water resources management policies is well documented in the economics literature. This need is also emphasised in the European Union's recent Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), and is relevant to the objectives of Euro-limpacs, an EU funded project which inter alia, aims to provide a decision-support system for valuing the effects of future global change on Europe's freshwater ecosystems. The purpose of this paper is to define the role of economic valuation techniques in assisting in the design of efficient, equitable and sustainable policies for water resources management in the face of environmental problems such as pollution, intensive land use in agriculture and climate change. The paper begins with a discussion of the conceptual economic framework that can be used to inform water policy-making. An inventory of the available economic valuation methods is presented and the scope and suitability of each for studying various aspects of water resources are critically discussed. Recent studies that apply these methods to water resources are reviewed. Finally, an application of one of the economic valuation methods, namely the contingent valuation method, is presented using a case study of the Cheimaditida wetland in Greece.

摘要

经济学文献中充分记载了对高效水资源管理政策的设计与实施进行经济分析的必要性。欧盟近期的《水框架指令》(2000/60/EC)也强调了这一必要性,并且这与欧洲环境与气候变迁影响评估合作计划(Euro-limpacs)的目标相关,该计划是一个由欧盟资助的项目,其目标之一是提供一个决策支持系统,用于评估未来全球变化对欧洲淡水生态系统的影响。本文的目的是确定经济估值技术在面对诸如污染、农业土地集约利用和气候变化等环境问题时,协助设计高效、公平和可持续的水资源管理政策中所起的作用。本文首先讨论了可用于为水政策制定提供信息的概念性经济框架。列出了现有的经济估值方法,并对每种方法在研究水资源各个方面的范围和适用性进行了严格讨论。回顾了将这些方法应用于水资源的近期研究。最后,通过希腊凯马迪蒂达湿地的案例研究,展示了一种经济估值方法——条件价值法的应用。

相似文献

1
Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application.运用经济评估技术为水资源管理提供信息:对现有技术的调查与批判性评估及一项应用
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Jul 15;365(1-3):105-22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.032. Epub 2006 May 2.
2
Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: an empirical approach for Spain.经济评估废水处理过程的环境效益:西班牙的实证方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Jan 15;408(4):953-7. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.028. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
3
Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the Water Framework Directive.运用多准则分析法探索在《水框架指令》背景下水质变化的非市场货币价值。
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Sep 1;408(19):3990-7. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.048. Epub 2010 May 1.
4
The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept.《水框架指令》背景下恢复水质的社会效益:支付意愿与接受意愿的比较
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Aug 1;407(16):4574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 May 27.
5
The economic value of water use: implications for implementing the Water Framework Directive in Scotland.用水的经济价值:对在苏格兰实施《水框架指令》的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2008 May;87(3):484-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.043. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
6
A decision support for an integrated multi-scale analysis of irrigation: DSIRR.一种用于灌溉综合多尺度分析的决策支持工具:DSIRR
J Environ Manage. 2005 Dec;77(4):301-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.001. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
7
Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive.运用选择实验法评估河流生态改善的经济价值:以水框架指令为例
J Environ Manage. 2006 Jan;78(2):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
8
Adaptive coastal planning and the European Union's water framework directive: a Swedish perspective.适应性海岸规划与欧盟水框架指令:瑞典视角
Ambio. 2005 Mar;34(2):157-62.
9
Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues.生态系统评估:一个序贯决策支持系统和质量评估问题。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jan;1185:79-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05280.x.
10
The EU Water Framework Directive--a key to catchment-based governance.欧盟水框架指令——流域治理的关键
Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(8):105-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Major Factors for Success and Failure of Conservation Programs in Europe.确定欧洲保护项目成败的主要因素。
Environ Manage. 2025 Mar;75(3):425-443. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02086-x. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
2
Estimating the recreational use value of Tis-Abay Waterfall in the upstream of the Blue Nile River, North-West Ethiopia.估算埃塞俄比亚西北部青尼罗河上游提斯-阿贝瀑布的游憩使用价值。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 21;8(12):e12410. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12410. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Models help set ecosystem service baselines for restoration assessment.
模型有助于确定生态系统服务基准,以进行恢复评估。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 1;317:115411. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115411. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
4
Downscaling a Human Well-Being Index for Environmental Management and Environmental Justice Applications in Puerto Rico.为波多黎各环境管理与环境正义应用缩减人类福祉指数
Appl Geogr. 2020 Jul 8;123:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102231.
5
Projecting effects of land use change on human well-being through changes in ecosystem services.通过生态系统服务的变化预测土地利用变化对人类福祉的影响。
Ecol Modell. 2020 Nov 14;440:109358. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109358.
6
Social benefits of improving water infrastructure in South Korea: upgrading sewage treatment plants.改善韩国水基础设施的社会效益:升级污水处理厂。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(10):11202-11212. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07733-4. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Public Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for River Ecosystem Services.公众对河流生态系统服务的态度、偏好和支付意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;16(19):3707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193707.
8
Who Benefits from National Estuaries? Applying the FEGS Classification System to Identify Ecosystem Services and their Beneficiaries.谁从国家河口受益?应用 FEGS 分类系统来识别生态系统服务及其受益者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 3;16(13):2351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132351.
9
Spatial disparities of the willingness of the residents to pay for the wetland restoration of Taihu Lake and its integration into decision making: a case study on Wuxi, China.太湖湿地恢复居民支付意愿的空间差异及其在决策中的整合:以中国无锡为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Aug;187(8):492. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4654-8. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
Residential preferences for river network improvement: an exploration of choice experiments in Zhujiajiao, Shanghai, China.居民对改善河网的偏好:以上海市朱家角为例的选择实验探索。
Environ Manage. 2014 Sep;54(3):517-30. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0323-x. Epub 2014 Jul 11.