Suppr超能文献

脊髓刺激对血管疾病影响的潜在机制:实验研究综述

Putative mechanisms behind effects of spinal cord stimulation on vascular diseases: a review of experimental studies.

作者信息

Wu Mingyuan, Linderoth Bengt, Foreman Robert D

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, United States.

出版信息

Auton Neurosci. 2008 Feb 29;138(1-2):9-23. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2007.11.001.

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a widely used clinical technique to treat ischemic pain in peripheral, cardiac and cerebral vascular diseases. The use of this treatment advanced rapidly during the late 80's and 90's, particularly in Europe. Although the clinical benefits of SCS are clear and the success rate remains high, the mechanisms are not yet completely understood. SCS at lumbar spinal segments (L2-L3) produces vasodilation in the lower limbs and feet which is mediated by antidromic activation of sensory fibers and decreased sympathetic outflow. SCS at thoracic spinal segments (T1-T2) induces several benefits including pain relief, reduction in both frequency and severity of angina attacks, and reduced short-acting nitrate intake. The benefits to the heart are not likely due to an increase, or redistribution of local blood flow, rather, they are associated with SCS-induced myocardial protection and normalization of the intrinsic cardiac nervous system. At somewhat lower cervical levels (C3-C6), SCS induces increased blood flow in the upper extremities. SCS at the upper cervical spinal segments (C1-C2) increased cerebral blood flow, which is associated with a decrease in sympathetic activity, an increase in vasomotor center activity and a release of neurohumoral factors. This review will summarize the basic science studies that have contributed to our understanding about mechanisms through which SCS produces beneficial effects when used in the treatment of vascular diseases. Furthermore, this review will particularly focus on the antidromic mechanisms of SCS-induced vasodilation in the lower limbs and feet.

摘要

脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种广泛应用于治疗外周、心脏和脑血管疾病缺血性疼痛的临床技术。在20世纪80年代末和90年代,这种治疗方法的应用迅速发展,尤其是在欧洲。尽管SCS的临床益处明显且成功率仍然很高,但其机制尚未完全明确。在腰段脊髓节段(L2-L3)进行SCS可使下肢和足部血管扩张,这是由感觉纤维的逆行激活和交感神经传出减少介导的。在胸段脊髓节段(T1-T2)进行SCS可带来多种益处,包括缓解疼痛、减少心绞痛发作的频率和严重程度以及减少短效硝酸盐的摄入量。对心脏的益处不太可能是由于局部血流量增加或重新分布,相反,它们与SCS诱导的心肌保护和心脏内在神经系统的正常化有关。在稍低的颈段水平(C3-C6),SCS可使上肢血流量增加。在上颈段脊髓节段(C1-C2)进行SCS可增加脑血流量,这与交感神经活动减少、血管运动中枢活动增加以及神经体液因子的释放有关。本综述将总结有助于我们理解SCS在治疗血管疾病时产生有益作用机制的基础科学研究。此外,本综述将特别关注SCS诱导下肢和足部血管扩张的逆行机制。

相似文献

1
2
Mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation in ischemia.
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Dec 15;21(6):E2. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.21.6.5.
3
Spinal cord stimulation modulates intraspinal colorectal visceroreceptive transmission in rats.
Neurosci Res. 2007 May;58(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2007.01.014. Epub 2007 Feb 4.
4
Spinal cord stimulation for ischemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease.
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2007;32:63-89. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-47423-5_4.
7
Spinal cord stimulation reduces ventricular arrhythmias during acute ischemia by attenuation of regional myocardial excitability.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017 Aug 1;313(2):H421-H431. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00129.2017. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
8
Long-term modulation of the intrinsic cardiac nervous system by spinal cord neurons in normal and ischaemic hearts.
Auton Neurosci. 2002 Jan 10;95(1-2):71-9. doi: 10.1016/s1566-0702(01)00377-0.
9
C2 spinal cord stimulation induces dynorphin release from rat T4 spinal cord: potential modulation of myocardial ischemia-sensitive neurons.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008 Nov;295(5):R1519-28. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00899.2007. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
10
Preemptive spinal cord stimulation reduces ischemia in an animal model of vasospasm.
Neurosurgery. 1995 Aug;37(2):266-71; discussion 271-2. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199508000-00011.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain‑heart axis: Neurostimulation techniques in ischemic heart disease (Review).
Int J Mol Med. 2025 Oct;56(4). doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2025.5589. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
4
A case series of new-onset headache and neurological issues after thoracolumbar spinal cord stimulators.
Br J Pain. 2025 Jan 5:20494637241310705. doi: 10.1177/20494637241310705.
5
Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: small cohort study.
Front Surg. 2024 Dec 9;11:1451622. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1451622. eCollection 2024.
6
Neuroscience of the human thalamus related to acute pain and chronic "thalamic" pain.
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Dec 1;132(6):1756-1778. doi: 10.1152/jn.00065.2024. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
7
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Chronic Limb Ischemia: A Narrative Review.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Aug 26;11(9):260. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11090260.
8
Pain-induced autonomic dysreflexia secondary to spinal cord injury with significant improvement after spinal cord stimulator implantation.
Interv Pain Med. 2023 May 26;2(2):100254. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100254. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Physiology of spinal cord stimulation: review and update.
Neuromodulation. 1999 Jul;2(3):150-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00150.x.
2
Blood flow increase by cervical spinal cord stimulation in middle cerebral and common carotid arteries.
Neuromodulation. 2004 Jan;7(1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2004.04003.x.
4
Effects of spinal cord stimulation on peripheral blood circulation in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
Neuromodulation. 2007 Jul;10(3):216-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00111.x.
9
Transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor-1 does not contribute to slowly adapting airway receptor activation by inhaled ammonia.
Auton Neurosci. 2007 May 30;133(2):121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2006.10.007. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
10
Involvement of endothelial cell-derived CGRP in heat stress-induced protection of endothelial function.
Vascul Pharmacol. 2007 Apr;46(4):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Oct 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验