• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物滥用治疗提供者对权变管理的看法与异议:对传播的影响

Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: implications for dissemination.

作者信息

Kirby Kimberly C, Benishek Lois A, Dugosh Karen Leggett, Kerwin Marylouise E

机构信息

Treatment Research Institute, 600 Public Ledger Building, 150 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Oct 15;85(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.010
PMID:16650657
Abstract

Contingency management (CM) interventions are among the most effective methods for initiating drug abstinence, but they infrequently have been adopted by community drug and alcohol treatment programs. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the prevalence of specific beliefs that community treatment providers hold regarding contingency management interventions. We surveyed 383 treatment providers from three geographical areas of the United States regarding moral or ethical objections, negative side effects, practicality, limitations and positive opinions regarding tangible and social CM interventions. Results indicate that positive beliefs were surprisingly prevalent, with providers agreeing with an average of 67% of the positive statements regarding CM using tangible incentives and 54% indicating that they would be in favor of adding a tangible CM intervention to their treatment program. The most prevalent objections to incentive programs were that they cost too much, fail to address the underlying problems of addiction, and do not address multiple behaviors. Social incentives were viewed more favorably than tangible incentives and both were viewed more positively by providers who were supervisors, had advanced degrees, had more addictions experience, and had previous experience with tangible incentives. These findings have implications for improving the dissemination of this empirically-supported treatment.

摘要

应急管理(CM)干预措施是促使戒毒的最有效方法之一,但社区戒毒和戒酒治疗项目却很少采用。本调查的主要目的是确定社区治疗提供者对应急管理干预措施持有的特定信念的普遍程度。我们对来自美国三个地理区域的383名治疗提供者进行了调查,内容涉及道德或伦理方面的反对意见、负面副作用、实用性、局限性以及对物质和社会CM干预措施的积极看法。结果表明,积极信念出奇地普遍,提供者平均同意67%关于使用物质奖励的CM的积极陈述,54%表示他们会赞成在其治疗项目中增加物质CM干预措施。对奖励计划最普遍的反对意见是成本太高、未能解决成瘾的根本问题以及未涉及多种行为。社会奖励比物质奖励更受青睐,而且主管、拥有高级学位、有更多成瘾治疗经验以及曾有过物质奖励经验的提供者对两者的评价都更积极。这些发现对改进这种经实证支持的治疗方法的推广具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: implications for dissemination.药物滥用治疗提供者对权变管理的看法与异议:对传播的影响
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Oct 15;85(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 2.
2
Beliefs about the empirical support of drug abuse treatment interventions: a survey of outpatient treatment providers.关于药物滥用治疗干预措施的实证支持的信念:对门诊治疗提供者的调查。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Mar 1;107(2-3):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.10.013. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
3
Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.低成本激励措施对美沙酮维持治疗中兴奋剂戒断的影响:一项国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;63(2):201-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.201.
4
Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study.基于奖励的激励措施对门诊心理社会治疗项目中兴奋剂滥用者治疗效果的影响:一项国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;62(10):1148-56. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.10.1148.
5
Organizational and client determinants of cost in outpatient substance abuse treatment.门诊药物滥用治疗中成本的组织和客户决定因素。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Mar;10(1):3-13.
6
Australian clinician attitudes towards contingency management: comparing down under with America.澳大利亚临床医生对权变管理的态度:澳大利亚与美国的比较
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Mar 16;87(2-3):312-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
7
Potential sources of reinforcement and punishment in a drug-free treatment clinic: client and staff perceptions.戒毒治疗诊所中强化和惩罚的潜在来源:客户和工作人员的看法。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31(1):21-33.
8
Is exposure to an effective contingency management intervention associated with more positive provider beliefs?接触有效的应急管理干预措施是否与更积极的提供者信念相关?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Jun;42(4):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
9
Substance abuse interface with intimate partner violence: what treatment programs need to know.物质滥用与亲密伴侣暴力的相互作用:治疗项目需要了解的内容。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2010 Dec;45(4):581-9, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
10
Economic evaluation of a prerelease substance abuse treatment program for repeat criminal offenders.重复犯罪者提前释放前滥用药物治疗方案的经济评价。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jan;38(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing contingency management in family medicine: A qualitative inquiry on provider and patient preferences for a low magnitude reward program compatible with buprenorphine treatment.在家庭医学中实施应急管理:关于提供者和患者对与丁丙诺啡治疗相兼容的低强度奖励计划偏好的定性调查。
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 28:rs.3.rs-6347618. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6347618/v1.
2
Addiction specialists' perspectives on digital contingency management and its role within UK drug and alcohol services: A qualitative exploration.成瘾专家对数字应急管理及其在英国毒品和酒精服务中的作用的看法:一项定性探索。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2025 May;44(4):946-960. doi: 10.1111/dar.14046. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Emerging medications and pharmacological treatment approaches for substance use disorders.
物质使用障碍的新兴药物及药物治疗方法。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2025 Mar;248:173952. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173952. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
4
Evaluating the social acceptability of the Re-Connect concept: A smartphone-based, nonfinancial, contingency management intervention.评估“重新连接”概念的社会可接受性:一种基于智能手机的、非财务性的应急管理干预措施。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan;58(1):91-99. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2923. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
5
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Game to Support Smoking Cessation: Repeated Measures Study.一款支持戒烟的手机游戏的可行性与可接受性:重复测量研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Aug 21;12:e54684. doi: 10.2196/54684.
6
Methamphetamine dependence in Australia-why is 'ice' (crystal meth) so addictive?澳大利亚的甲基苯丙胺依赖——为什么“冰毒”(甲基苯丙胺晶体)如此容易上瘾?
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Jul 4;31(4):671-704. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2206870. eCollection 2024.
7
The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder.美国酒精滥用与药物依赖协会/美国成瘾医师协会临床实践指南:兴奋剂使用障碍管理
J Addict Med. 2024;18(1S Suppl 1):1-56. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001299.
8
Optimizing Contingency Management with Reinforcement Learning.利用强化学习优化应急管理
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 29:2024.03.28.24305031. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.28.24305031.
9
The IMPACT (Infection Management Plus Addiction Care Together) Pilot: A Case Series of Combined Contingency Management for Substance Use Disorders and Antibiotic Adherence in the Hospital Setting.IMPACT(感染管理加成瘾护理)试点研究:医院环境中联合使用物质使用障碍和抗生素依从性的条件性管理病例系列。
J Addict Med. 2024;18(2):138-143. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001254. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
10
Juvenile Probation Officer Perception of Contingency Management to Target Caregiver Engagement and Training Outcomes.青少年缓刑监督官对以照顾者参与和培训成果为目标的权变管理的认知。
J Offender Rehabil. 2023;62(5):315-335. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2023.2213692. Epub 2023 Jun 5.