Suppr超能文献

与产前地塞米松和产前倍他米松相关的不良新生儿结局。

Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with antenatal dexamethasone versus antenatal betamethasone.

作者信息

Lee Ben H, Stoll Barbara J, McDonald Scott A, Higgins Rosemary D

机构信息

Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1503-10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1749.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Antenatal dexamethasone and betamethasone may not be equally efficacious in the prevention of adverse neonatal outcomes. We compared the risks of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and neonatal death among very low birth weight infants who were exposed to dexamethasone, betamethasone, or neither steroid.

METHODS

Infants (401-1500 g) in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network were studied. Multivariate logistic regression analyses compared the 3 groups with regard to PVL, IVH, ROP, and neonatal death, adjusting for network center and selected covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 3600 infants met entry criteria. Compared with no antenatal steroids, there were trends for a reduced risk for PVL associated with dexamethasone and betamethasone but no difference in risk between dexamethasone and betamethasone. Dexamethasone reduced the risk for IVH and severe IVH, compared with no antenatal steroid exposure. Betamethasone reduced the risk for IVH, severe IVH, and neonatal death, compared with no antenatal steroids. Compared with betamethasone, dexamethasone had a statistically significant increased risk for neonatal death. There were trends for greater risks associated with dexamethasone compared with betamethasone for IVH and severe ROP.

CONCLUSIONS

Betamethasone was associated with a reduced risk for neonatal death, with trends of decreased risk for other adverse neonatal outcomes, compared with dexamethasone. It may be in the best interest of neonates to receive betamethasone rather than dexamethasone when available.

摘要

目的

产前使用地塞米松和倍他米松在预防新生儿不良结局方面的效果可能并不相同。我们比较了接受地塞米松、倍他米松或未接受任何一种类固醇治疗的极低出生体重儿发生脑室周围白质软化(PVL)、脑室内出血(IVH)、早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)和新生儿死亡的风险。

方法

对美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络中的婴儿(体重401 - 1500克)进行研究。多因素逻辑回归分析比较了三组在PVL、IVH、ROP和新生儿死亡方面的情况,并对网络中心和选定的协变量进行了调整。

结果

共有3600名婴儿符合纳入标准。与未使用产前类固醇相比,地塞米松和倍他米松与PVL风险降低的趋势相关,但地塞米松和倍他米松之间的风险无差异。与未暴露于产前类固醇相比,地塞米松降低了IVH和重度IVH的风险。与未使用产前类固醇相比,倍他米松降低了IVH、重度IVH和新生儿死亡的风险。与倍他米松相比,地塞米松使新生儿死亡风险有统计学意义的增加。与倍他米松相比,地塞米松在IVH和重度ROP方面有更高风险的趋势。

结论

与地塞米松相比,倍他米松与新生儿死亡风险降低相关,在其他新生儿不良结局方面也有风险降低的趋势。在可行的情况下,新生儿接受倍他米松而非地塞米松可能最有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验