Zeldin M H, Schiff J A
Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02154.
Plant Physiol. 1967 Jul;42(7):922-32. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.7.922.
Methods are described which provide good recoveries of non-degraded chloroplast and non-chloroplast RNAs from Euglena gracilis var. bacillaris. These have been characterized by comparing the RNA from W(3)BUL (an aplastidic mutant of Euglena), with that of wild-type cells which have been resolved into chloroplast and non-chloroplast fractions. Using E. coli RNA as a standard, the RNAs from W(3)BUL and from the non-chloroplast fraction of green cells exhibit optical density peaks, upon sucrose gradient centrifugation, at 4S, 10S, and 19S. The chloroplast fraction exhibits optical density peaks at 19S and 14S with the 19S component predominating. Application of various techniques for the separation of RNAs to the problem of separating the chloroplast and non-chloroplast RNAs, without prior separation of the organelle, have not proven successful.(32)P(i) is readily incorporated into RNA by cells undergoing light-induced chloroplast development, and fractionation at the end of development reveals that although chloroplast RNAs have a higher specific activity, the other RNAs of the cells are significantly labeled as well. The succession of labeling patterns of total cellular RNA as light-induced chloroplast development proceeds are displayed and reveal that all RNA species mentioned above eventually become labeled. In contrast, cells kept in darkness during this period incorporate little (32)P(i) into any RNA fraction. In addition, a heavy RNA component, designated as 28S, while representing a negligible fraction of the total RNA, becomes significantly labeled during the first 24 hours of illumination. While there is light stimulated uptake of (32)P(i) into the cells, this uptake is never limiting in the light or dark, for RNA labeling.On the basis of these findings, we suggest that extensive activation of non-chloroplast RNA labeling during chloroplast development is the result of the activation of the cellular synthetic machinery external to the chloroplast necessary to provide metabolic precursors for plastid development. Thus the plastid is viewed as an auxotrophic resident within the cell during development. Other possibilities for interaction at this and other levels are also discussed.
本文描述了从纤细裸藻巴氏变种中回收未降解的叶绿体和非叶绿体RNA的良好方法。通过比较来自W(3)BUL(纤细裸藻的无质体突变体)的RNA与已分离为叶绿体和非叶绿体部分的野生型细胞的RNA,对这些RNA进行了表征。以大肠杆菌RNA为标准,来自W(3)BUL和绿色细胞非叶绿体部分的RNA在蔗糖梯度离心时,在4S、10S和19S处呈现光密度峰。叶绿体部分在19S和14S处呈现光密度峰,其中19S成分占主导。在不预先分离细胞器的情况下,将各种RNA分离技术应用于叶绿体和非叶绿体RNA的分离问题,尚未证明是成功的。(32)P(i)很容易被经历光诱导叶绿体发育的细胞掺入RNA中,发育结束时的分级分离表明,虽然叶绿体RNA具有较高的比活性,但细胞的其他RNA也被显著标记。展示了随着光诱导叶绿体发育进行,总细胞RNA标记模式的连续变化,揭示了上述所有RNA种类最终都会被标记。相比之下,在此期间保持黑暗的细胞将很少的(32)P(i)掺入任何RNA部分。此外,一种重RNA成分,指定为28S,虽然在总RNA中占比可忽略不计,但在光照的前24小时内会被显著标记。虽然有光刺激(32)P(i)进入细胞,但这种摄取在光照或黑暗条件下对RNA标记来说都不是限制因素。基于这些发现,我们认为在叶绿体发育过程中非叶绿体RNA标记的广泛激活是叶绿体外部细胞合成机制被激活的结果,该机制为质体发育提供代谢前体。因此,在发育过程中,质体被视为细胞内的营养缺陷型驻留体。还讨论了在此及其他层面相互作用的其他可能性。