Department of Botany, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Plant Physiol. 1970 Aug;46(2):236-9. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.2.236.
Rates of net photosynthesis were studied in soil-grown corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) plants having various leaf water potentials. Soybean was unaffected by desiccation until leaf water potentials were below -11 bars. Rates of photosynthesis in corn were inhibited whenever leaf water potentials dropped below -3.5 bars.The differences in photosynthetic behavior could be attributed solely to differences in stomatal behavior down to leaf water potentials of -16 bars in soybean and -10 bars in corn. Below these potentials, other factors in addition to stomatal closure caused inhibition, although their effect was relatively small.Corn, which has the C(4)-dicarboxylic acid pathway for carbon fixation, generally had a higher rate of photosynthesis than soybean during desiccation. Nevertheless, since inhibition of photosynthesis began at higher potentials than in soybean, and since corn was less able to withstand severe desiccation without tissue death, it was concluded that the C(4) pathway confers no particular ability to withstand low leaf water potentials.
对具有不同叶片水势的土壤生长的玉米(Zea mays)和大豆(Glycine max)植物的净光合作用速率进行了研究。直到叶片水势低于-11 巴时,大豆才会受到干燥的影响。只要叶片水势下降到-3.5 巴以下,玉米的光合作用速率就会受到抑制。光合作用行为的差异可以完全归因于气孔行为的差异,在大豆中,叶片水势降至-16 巴,在玉米中降至-10 巴。在这些水势以下,除了气孔关闭之外,其他因素也会导致抑制,尽管其影响相对较小。玉米具有 C(4)-二羧酸途径进行碳固定,在干燥过程中通常比大豆具有更高的光合作用速率。然而,由于光合作用的抑制开始于比大豆更高的电势,并且由于玉米在没有组织死亡的情况下更难以承受严重的干燥,因此得出结论,C(4)途径没有赋予其耐受低叶片水势的特殊能力。