Boudreaux Edwin D, Cruz Brian L, Baumann Brigitte M
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Cooper Hospital, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;13(7):795-802. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.01.031. Epub 2006 May 2.
The authors reviewed the evidence on performance improvement methods for increasing emergency department (ED) patient satisfaction to provide evidence-based suggestions for clinical practice.
Data sources consisted of searches through MEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, Cochrane Library, and Emergency Medicine Abstracts and a manual search of references. Articles were included if they reported a performance improvement intervention targeting patient satisfaction in the ED setting. Articles on studies not conducted in the United States or that failed to provide enough details to allow critical evaluation of the study were excluded. Two authors used structured evaluation criteria to independently review each retained study.
Nineteen articles met all selection criteria. Three studies found varying levels of support for multicomponent interventions, predominantly focused on implementation of clinical practice guidelines for specific presenting complaints and process redesign. Sixteen studies evaluated single-component interventions, with the following having at least one supportive study: using alternating patient assignment to provider teams rather than "zone"-based assignment, enhancing provider communication and customer service skills, incorporating information delivery interventions (e.g., pamphlets, video) that target patient expectations, using preformatted charts, and establishing ED-based observation units for specific conditions such as asthma and chest pain.
There is modest evidence supporting a range of performance improvement interventions for improving ED patient satisfaction. Further work is needed before specific, evidence-based recommendations can be made regarding which process changes are most effective. Recommendations are made for improving the quality of performance improvement efforts in the ED setting.
作者回顾了关于提高急诊科(ED)患者满意度的绩效改进方法的证据,为临床实践提供循证建议。
数据来源包括通过MEDLINE、CINAHL、PSYCHINFO、Cochrane图书馆和急诊医学文摘进行检索,以及对参考文献的手工检索。如果文章报告了针对急诊科患者满意度的绩效改进干预措施,则纳入研究。排除在美国以外进行的研究或未能提供足够细节以进行研究批判性评估的文章。两位作者使用结构化评估标准独立审查每项纳入的研究。
19篇文章符合所有入选标准。三项研究发现对多成分干预措施有不同程度的支持,主要集中在针对特定就诊主诉实施临床实践指南和流程重新设计。16项研究评估了单成分干预措施,以下至少有一项支持性研究:采用交替为医护团队分配患者而非基于“区域”的分配方式、提高医护人员沟通和客户服务技能、纳入针对患者期望的信息传递干预措施(如宣传册、视频)、使用预先格式化的图表,以及为哮喘和胸痛等特定病症设立基于急诊科的观察单元。
有适度证据支持一系列提高急诊科患者满意度的绩效改进干预措施。在就哪些流程改变最有效提出具体的循证建议之前,还需要进一步开展工作。针对提高急诊科绩效改进工作的质量提出了建议。