• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施;谨慎行事的原因。

Worksite interventions to increase stair climbing; reasons for caution.

作者信息

Eves Frank F, Webb Oliver J

机构信息

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2006 Jul;43(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.011
PMID:16675007
Abstract

Point-of-choice prompts to use the stairs rather than the escalator consistently increase physical activity at public access staircases such as those in shopping malls. More recently, exercise promoters have targeted stair climbing in the worksite. A review of interventions in worksites reveals little hard evidence of successful increases in stair climbing, though the increases in stair usage are encouraging. The contrast between the worksites and public access staircases, however, is not simply one of location. In a worksite, the choice is between the stairs and an elevator rather than an escalator. We reason that the availability of the elevator or the stairwell may be the major immediate determinant of stair climbing in worksites and dilute any possible effects of an intervention.

摘要

在诸如购物中心的公共通道楼梯处,选择使用楼梯而非自动扶梯的提示能够持续增加身体活动量。最近,运动推广者将工作场所的爬楼梯作为目标。对工作场所干预措施的一项综述显示,虽然楼梯使用率的增加令人鼓舞,但几乎没有确凿证据表明爬楼梯的行为成功增加。然而,工作场所与公共通道楼梯之间的差异不仅仅在于位置。在工作场所,选择是在楼梯和电梯之间,而非楼梯和自动扶梯之间。我们推断,电梯或楼梯井的可用性可能是工作场所爬楼梯行为的主要直接决定因素,并会削弱干预措施可能产生的任何效果。

相似文献

1
Worksite interventions to increase stair climbing; reasons for caution.增加爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施;谨慎行事的原因。
Prev Med. 2006 Jul;43(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 3.
2
Does a video displaying a stair climbing model increase stair use in a worksite setting?视频展示爬楼梯模型能否增加工作场所的楼梯使用?
Public Health. 2017 Aug;149:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 15.
3
Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators: what about escalator climbers?在楼梯和自动扶梯之间的选择点增加身体活动的提示:那自动扶梯攀爬者呢?
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jul 16;9(4):656-662. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby080.
4
Review Article: Increasing physical activity with point-of-choice prompts--a systematic review.综述文章:利用选择点提示增加身体活动——系统综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Aug;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494810375865. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
5
A workplace intervention to promote stair climbing: greater effects in the overweight.一项促进爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施:对超重者效果更佳。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Dec;14(12):2210-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.259.
6
Promoting Stair Climbing in a Worksite and Public Setting: Are Footprints Enough?在工作场所和公共场所推广爬楼梯:脚印就足够了吗?
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):527-535. doi: 10.1177/0890117117694284. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention.针对工作场所热量消耗的多组件楼梯攀登推广活动;一项准实验研究,测试对行为、态度和意愿的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 11;12:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-423.
8
A poster-based intervention to promote stair use in blue- and white-collar worksites.一种基于海报的干预措施,用于促进蓝领和白领工作场所的楼梯使用。
Prev Med. 2007 Aug-Sep;45(2-3):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 May 21.
9
Effectiveness and cost of two stair-climbing interventions-less is more.两种爬楼梯干预措施的效果和成本——少即是多。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(4):231-6. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090325-QUAN-119.
10
Signage Interventions for Stair Climbing at Work: More than 700,000 Reasons for Caution.工作场所楼梯攀爬的标识干预措施:超过 70 万条需要谨慎的理由。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 8;16(19):3782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193782.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Aspects of Stair Use: A Systematic Review.楼梯使用的心理层面:一项系统综述
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Aug 27;16(1):109-121. doi: 10.1177/1559827619870104. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
2
When weight is an encumbrance; avoidance of stairs by different demographic groups.当体重成为负担时;不同人群回避楼梯。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0228044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228044. eCollection 2020.
3
Signage Interventions for Stair Climbing at Work: More than 700,000 Reasons for Caution.工作场所楼梯攀爬的标识干预措施:超过 70 万条需要谨慎的理由。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 8;16(19):3782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193782.
4
Learnt effects of environmental cues on transport-related walking; disrupting habits with health promotion?学习环境线索对与交通相关的步行的影响;用健康促进来打破习惯?
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220308. eCollection 2019.
5
Associations between the Objectively Measured Office Environment and Workplace Step Count and Sitting Time: Cross-Sectional Analyses from the Active Buildings Study.客观测量的办公环境与工作场所步数和久坐时间的关联:来自积极建筑研究的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061135.
6
Effectiveness of physical activity intervention among government employees with metabolic syndrome.体育活动干预对患有代谢综合征的政府雇员的有效性。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2017 Dec;15(2):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
7
Promoting workplace stair climbing: sometimes, not interfering is the best.促进职场爬楼梯:有时,不干预就是最好的。
Arch Public Health. 2017 Jan 9;75:2. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0170-8. eCollection 2017.
8
Is there any Proffitt in stair climbing? A headcount of studies testing for demographic differences in choice of stairs.爬楼梯时有 Proffitt 吗?对选择楼梯的人口统计学差异进行研究的人数统计。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):71-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0463-7.
9
The daily 10 kcal expenditure deficit: a before-and-after study on low-cost interventions in the work environment.每日 10 卡路里支出不足:工作环境中低成本干预措施的前后研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 24;3(1):e002125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002125.
10
A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention.针对工作场所热量消耗的多组件楼梯攀登推广活动;一项准实验研究,测试对行为、态度和意愿的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 11;12:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-423.