Brouwers Evelien P M, Tiemens Bea G, Terluin Berend, Verhaak Peter F M
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):223-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.02.005.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an activating intervention designed to reduce sick leave duration in patients with emotional distress or minor mental disorders.
In a 1.5-year randomized controlled trial, 194 patients with minor mental disorders received either an experimental intervention by social workers or general practitioners' usual care. The intervention focused on understanding causes, developing and implementing problem-solving strategies and promoting early work resumption. Outcome measures were sick leave duration, mental health and physical health (questionnaires included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire and SF-36), all measured at baseline at and 3, 6 and 18 months later. Multilevel analyses were used to evaluate differences between groups.
The groups did not differ significantly on any of the outcome measures, except that the experimental group reported higher satisfaction with treatment.
Although the intervention has benefits, it was not successful at its primary goal (i.e., to reduce sick leave duration in patients with emotional distress or minor mental disorders). Programs aimed at the reduction of sick leave duration may yield better results if targeted at patients with more severe emotional problems than at those with exclusively emotional distress or minor mental disorders, or if delivered by caregivers who are closer to the work environment than are social workers, such as occupational physicians.
本研究旨在评估一种旨在缩短情绪困扰或轻度精神障碍患者病假时长的激活干预措施的有效性。
在一项为期1.5年的随机对照试验中,194名轻度精神障碍患者接受了社会工作者的实验性干预或全科医生的常规护理。干预重点在于理解病因、制定并实施解决问题的策略以及促进早日恢复工作。结果指标为病假时长、心理健康和身体健康(问卷包括医院焦虑抑郁量表、四维症状问卷和SF-36),均在基线时以及3个月、6个月和18个月后进行测量。采用多水平分析评估组间差异。
除实验组对治疗的满意度较高外,两组在任何结果指标上均无显著差异。
尽管该干预措施有好处,但其主要目标(即缩短情绪困扰或轻度精神障碍患者的病假时长)未成功实现。如果针对情绪问题更严重的患者而非仅患有情绪困扰或轻度精神障碍的患者,或者由比社会工作者更贴近工作环境的护理人员(如职业医生)实施,旨在缩短病假时长的项目可能会产生更好的效果。