Suppr超能文献

控制术后疼痛的当前方法。

Current methods of controlling post-operative pain.

作者信息

Sinatra R S

机构信息

Dept. of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

出版信息

Yale J Biol Med. 1991 Jul-Aug;64(4):351-74.

Abstract

Until recently, the clinical significance of post-surgical pain and its undertreatment were for the most part unappreciated. Recognition that inadequate analgesia adversely affects the patient's cardiovascular, pulmonary, and emotional status has spurred development of new and highly effective methods of controlling pain. With the introduction of spinal opioid and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) came the realization that, while such forms of therapy provided superior pain relief, they were not without their own unique and occasionally serious side effects. For this reason, both techniques are more safely provided by highly trained members of a dedicated acute/post-surgical pain service. Although spinal opioid (epidural, intrathecal) techniques are invasive and require patient cooperation, they have a high degree of safety in low-risk populations (ASA 1 and 2). The major therapeutic advantage of spinal opioids is their ability to prevent pain from being perceived. PCA permits patients to titrate intravenous opioids in proportion to their particular level of pain intensity. Although PCA provides effective pain "relief," the technique is incapable of preventing pain from being appreciated. A number of studies have observed that pain scores in patients successfully employing PCA were significantly higher than those noted in individuals treated with epidural opioids. Nevertheless, the control gained by self-administration, uniformity of analgesia, and low level of adverse results associated with PCA provides higher patient satisfaction and decreased sedation when compared with traditional intramuscular dosing. The effectiveness of PCA may be improved by adjusting for patient variables, utilizing opioids having rapid onset, the addition of a basal infusion, and supplementation with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Interpleural analgesia represents an important therapeutic option in patients sensitive to opioid-induced respiratory depression. The technique is more effective when local anesthetic solutions are continually infused. Analgesic efficacy may be further enhanced by the addition of "low-dose" PCA.

摘要

直到最近,外科手术后疼痛及其治疗不足的临床意义在很大程度上仍未得到重视。认识到镇痛不足会对患者的心血管、肺部和情绪状态产生不利影响,这促使了新的高效疼痛控制方法的发展。随着脊髓阿片类药物和患者自控镇痛(PCA)的引入,人们意识到,虽然这些治疗方式能提供更好的疼痛缓解,但它们也有自身独特且偶尔严重的副作用。因此,这两种技术由专业的急性/外科术后疼痛服务团队中训练有素的成员来操作会更安全。尽管脊髓阿片类药物(硬膜外、鞘内)技术具有侵入性且需要患者配合,但在低风险人群(ASA 1和2)中具有较高的安全性。脊髓阿片类药物的主要治疗优势在于其能够阻止疼痛被感知。PCA允许患者根据自身特定的疼痛强度水平来滴定静脉注射阿片类药物。虽然PCA能有效“缓解”疼痛,但该技术无法阻止疼痛被感知。多项研究观察到,成功使用PCA的患者的疼痛评分显著高于接受硬膜外阿片类药物治疗的患者。然而,与传统的肌肉注射给药相比,PCA通过自我给药获得的控制、镇痛的均匀性以及较低的不良反应水平,能提供更高的患者满意度并减少镇静作用。通过调整患者变量、使用起效迅速的阿片类药物、添加基础输注以及补充非甾体类抗炎药,可以提高PCA的有效性。肋间镇痛是对阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制敏感的患者的一种重要治疗选择。当持续输注局部麻醉溶液时,该技术效果更佳。添加“低剂量”PCA可进一步增强镇痛效果。

相似文献

6
9
[Patient-controlled analgesia].[患者自控镇痛]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1991;10(3):269-83. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(05)80834-2.

本文引用的文献

2
A comparison of epidural morphine and epidural bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981 Oct;25(5):437-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01682.x.
8
Patient-controlled analgesia.
Ann Intern Med. 1983 Sep;99(3):360-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-3-360.
10
Differing distributions of receptors for morphine and Met5-enkephalinamide in the dorsal horn of the cat.
Brain Res. 1981 Dec 21;229(2):379-87. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91002-7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验