Tsuchida Shinya, Engelberts Doreen, Peltekova Vanya, Hopkins Natalie, Frndova Helena, Babyn Paul, McKerlie Colin, Post Martin, McLoughlin Paul, Kavanagh Brian P
Lung Biology Program, and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug 1;174(3):279-89. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-1006OC. Epub 2006 May 4.
Many authors have suggested that the mechanism by which atelectasis contributes to injury is through the repetitive opening and closing of distal airways in lung regions that are atelectatic. However, neither the topographic nor mechanistic relationships between atelectasis and distribution of lung injury are known.
To investigate how atelectasis contributes to ventilator-induced lung injury.
Surfactant depletion was performed in anesthetized rats that were then allocated to noninjurious or injurious ventilation for 90 min.
Lung injury was quantified by gas exchange, compliance, histology, wet-to-dry weight, and cytokine expression, and its distribution by histology, stereology, cytokine mRNA expression, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. Functional residual capacity, percent atelectasis, and injury-induced lung water accumulation were measured using gravimetric and volumetric techniques.
Atelectasis occurred in the dependent lung regions. Injurious ventilation was associated with alveolar and distal airway injury, while noninjurious ventilation was not. With injurious ventilation, alveolar injury (i.e., histology, myeloperoxidase protein expression, quantification, and localization of cytokine mRNA expression) was maximal in nondependent regions, whereas distal airway injury was equivalent in atelectatic and nonatelectatic regions.
These data support the notion that lung injury associated with atelectasis involves trauma to the distal airways. We provide topographic and biochemical evidence that such distal airway injury is not localized solely to atelectatic areas, but is instead generalized in both atelectatic and nonatelectatic lung regions. In contrast, alveolar injury associated with atelectasis does not occur in those areas that are atelectatic but occurs instead in remote nonatelectatic alveoli.
许多作者认为肺不张导致损伤的机制是通过肺不张区域远端气道的反复开闭。然而,肺不张与肺损伤分布之间的地形学和机制关系尚不清楚。
研究肺不张如何导致呼吸机诱导的肺损伤。
对麻醉大鼠进行表面活性物质耗竭,然后将其分配到非损伤性或损伤性通气90分钟。
通过气体交换、顺应性、组织学、湿重与干重以及细胞因子表达对肺损伤进行量化,并通过组织学、体视学、细胞因子mRNA表达、原位杂交和免疫组织化学对其分布进行量化。使用重量法和容量法测量功能残气量、肺不张百分比和损伤诱导的肺水积聚。
肺不张发生在下垂肺区域。损伤性通气与肺泡和远端气道损伤相关,而非损伤性通气则无此关联。在损伤性通气时,肺泡损伤(即组织学、髓过氧化物酶蛋白表达、细胞因子mRNA表达的量化和定位)在非下垂区域最大,而远端气道损伤在肺不张区域和非肺不张区域相当。
这些数据支持了与肺不张相关的肺损伤涉及远端气道创伤的观点。我们提供了地形学和生化证据,表明这种远端气道损伤并非仅局限于肺不张区域,而是在肺不张和非肺不张肺区域均普遍存在。相比之下,与肺不张相关的肺泡损伤并非发生在肺不张区域,而是发生在远处的非肺不张肺泡。