Melloni C, Devivo P, Launo C, Mastronardi P, Novelli G P, Romano E
Anestesia and Resuscitation Unit, City Hospital, Faenza (RA), Italy.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 May;72(5):299-308.
The aim of this study was to compare the time course characteristics of cisatracurium (C) and vecuronium (V) induced neuromuscular block (NMB) following multiple doses, allowing spontaneous complete recovery (SCRT) and evaluating the influence of age.
Following institutional approval and signed informed consent, 177 adult ASA 1-2 patients were included in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study under N20/02/fentanyl/propofol anesthesia. Muscle relaxation was induced with 0.15 mg/kg C or 0.l mg/kg V and was maintained with 0.03 mg/kg of C or 0.02 mg/kg of V injected at T1 25% recovery. Intubating conditions were assessed at 2 min after the initial dose. Time course of NMB was monitored using accelerography (Tofguard) of the adductor pollicis with train-of-four (TOF). Data were analyzed with parametric (Anova) and non parametric statistics (c2, Kruskal Wallis).
Both drugs offered good/excellent intubating conditions: duration of action of NMB (mean values +/- SD, minutes) were: dur25 first dose: V 38.20+/-13.2 vs C 51.5+/-11.3 (P<0.02 ); dur25 following repeated boluses (average): V 23.2+/- 8.6 vs C 28.2+/-9.5, ns; dur25 last dose: V 25.1+/-11.5 vs C 31.5+/-11.4, ns: SCRT following last dose: V 50.2+/-23.2 vs C 46.4+/-17.5, ns: t125% to t4/T1 0.80:V 27.1+/-18.7 vs C 18.8+/-10.2, ns. Stratifying for age >or< 65 no differences were noted in the intervals studied following C, while all were longer following V. The duration of block of C was longer than V; the SCRT after the final dose of C was shorter than V albeit not significant. There was a clinically significant increase in duration of block and recovery time in elderly patients for V but not for C.
C and V allow predictable NMB duration and spontaneous recovery even if administered in multiple repeated doses; but in elderly patients duration of block and recovery time is longer following V.
本研究旨在比较多次给药后顺式阿曲库铵(C)和维库溴铵(V)诱导的神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)的时程特征,实现自发完全恢复(SCRT)并评估年龄的影响。
经机构批准并签署知情同意书后,177例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)1-2级成年患者纳入一项在N20/02/芬太尼/丙泊酚麻醉下进行的随机、双盲、多中心研究。用0.15mg/kg C或0.1mg/kg V诱导肌肉松弛,并在T1 25%恢复时用0.03mg/kg C或0.02mg/kg V维持。在初始剂量后2分钟评估插管条件。使用拇内收肌的加速度描记法(Tofguard)和四个成串刺激(TOF)监测NMB的时程。数据用参数统计(方差分析)和非参数统计(卡方检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验)进行分析。
两种药物均提供了良好/极佳的插管条件:NMB的作用持续时间(平均值±标准差,分钟)为:首次剂量dur25:V为38.20±13.2,C为51.5±11.3(P<0.02);重复推注后的dur25(平均值):V为23.2±8.6,C为28.2±9.5,无显著差异;最后一剂的dur25:V为25.1±11.5,C为31.5±11.4,无显著差异:最后一剂后的SCRT:V为50.2±23.2,C为46.4±17.5,无显著差异:t125%至t4/T1 0.80:V为27.1±18.7,C为18.8±10.2,无显著差异。按年龄>或<65岁分层,C给药后所研究的时间间隔无差异,而V给药后所有时间间隔均更长。C的阻滞持续时间长于V;C最后一剂后的SCRT短于V,尽管不显著。老年患者中V的阻滞持续时间和恢复时间有临床显著增加,而C没有。
C和V即使多次重复给药也能实现可预测的NMB持续时间和自发恢复;但老年患者中V给药后的阻滞持续时间和恢复时间更长。