• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' perceptions and experiences of 'continuity of care' in diabetes.糖尿病患者对“连续性护理”的认知与体验
Health Expect. 2006 Jun;9(2):118-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00379.x.
2
UK GPs' and practice nurses' views of continuity of care for patients with type 2 diabetes.英国全科医生和执业护士对2型糖尿病患者连续性护理的看法。
Fam Pract. 2007 Apr;24(2):128-37. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm003. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
3
Patients' experiences of continuity in the care of type 2 diabetes: a focus group study in primary care.2型糖尿病患者连续性护理体验:一项初级保健中的焦点小组研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jul;56(528):488-95.
4
How is continuity of care experienced by people living with chronic kidney disease?慢性肾脏病患者的连续性护理体验如何?
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):153-161. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13860. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
5
Experience of continuity of care of patients with multiple long-term conditions in England.英格兰对患有多种长期疾病患者的连续性护理经验。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Apr;14(2):82-7. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008111.
6
Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter.英国全科医疗中的个人连续性与医疗服务可及性:一项关于全科医生和患者对其重要性的时间及方式认知的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Feb 24;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-11.
7
Continuity of care among diabetic patients in Accra, Ghana.加纳阿克拉的糖尿病患者的连续性护理。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 9;11:1141080. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1141080. eCollection 2023.
8
What is 'continuity of care'?什么是“连续性医疗”?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Oct;11(4):248-50. doi: 10.1258/135581906778476490.
9
Measuring continuity of care in diabetes mellitus: an experience-based measure.衡量糖尿病护理的连续性:一种基于经验的衡量方法。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;4(6):548-55. doi: 10.1370/afm.578.
10
'I've put diabetes completely on the shelf till the mental stuff is in place'. How patients with doctor-assessed impaired self-care perceive disease, self-care, and support from general practitioners. A qualitative study.“在心理问题解决之前,我把糖尿病完全搁置一边了”。医生评估为自我护理能力受损的患者如何看待疾病、自我护理以及来自全科医生的支持。一项定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Sep;36(3):342-351. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1487436. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Linkage to HIV care and hypertension and diabetes control in rural South Africa: Results from the population-based Vukuzazi Study.南非农村地区的艾滋病护理与高血压和糖尿病控制的关联:基于人群的Vukuzazi研究结果
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;2(11):e0001221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001221. eCollection 2022.
2
Why does continuity of care with family doctors matter? Review and qualitative synthesis of patient and physician perspectives.家庭医生连续性照护为何重要?患者和医生观点的回顾与定性综合。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Sep;67(9):679-688. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6709679.
3
Diabetes care provided by national standards can improve patients' self-management skills: A qualitative study of how people with type 2 diabetes perceive primary diabetes care.基于国家标准的糖尿病护理可以提高患者的自我管理技能:一项关于 2 型糖尿病患者如何看待初级糖尿病护理的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):1000-1008. doi: 10.1111/hex.13247. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
4
Patient and public perception and experience of community pharmacy services post-discharge in the UK: a rapid review and qualitative study.英国社区药房在出院后的服务:患者和公众的认知与体验——快速综述与定性研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 4;11(3):e043344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043344.
5
Impact on health and provision of healthcare services during the COVID-19 lockdown in India: a multicentre cross-sectional study.印度 COVID-19 封锁期间对健康和医疗服务提供的影响:一项多中心横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):e043590. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043590.
6
Prioritizing Community-Based Intervention Programs for Improving Treatment Compliance of Patients with Chronic Diseases: Applying an Analytic Hierarchy Process.优先考虑基于社区的干预计划,以提高慢性病患者的治疗依从性:应用层次分析法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;18(2):455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020455.
7
Infinicare framework for integrated understanding of health-related activities in clinical and daily-living contexts.Infinicare框架:用于在临床和日常生活环境中综合理解与健康相关的活动。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2017 Nov 7;7(1):66-78. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2017.1390060. eCollection 2018.
8
Attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours associated with hospital admission avoidance: a qualitative study of high-risk patients in primary care.与避免住院相关的态度、看法和行为:初级保健中高危患者的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jul;68(672):e460-e468. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X697493. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Continuity of care with physicians and risk of subsequent hospitalization and end-stage renal disease in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.新诊断2型糖尿病患者与医生的连续性照护及后续住院和终末期肾病风险
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Mar 13;14:511-521. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S150638. eCollection 2018.
10
The role of hospitals in bridging the care continuum: a systematic review of coordination of care and follow-up for adults with chronic conditions.医院在衔接医疗服务连续体中的作用:对慢性病成年患者医疗协调与随访的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2500-0.

本文引用的文献

1
What do patients and the public want from primary care?患者和公众对初级医疗保健有哪些期望?
BMJ. 2005 Nov 19;331(7526):1199-201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1199.
2
Competition in general practice.全科医疗中的竞争
BMJ. 2005 Nov 19;331(7526):1196-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1196.
3
Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.人际连续性护理与护理结果:一项批判性综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66. doi: 10.1370/afm.285.
4
Familiarity with a GP and patients' evaluations of care. A cross-sectional study.对全科医生的熟悉程度及患者对医疗服务的评价。一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2005 Feb;22(1):15-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh721. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
5
In my chosen doctor I trust.我信任我所选择的医生。
BMJ. 2004 Dec 18;329(7480):1418-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1418.
6
Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review.人际连续性护理与患者满意度:一项批判性综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-51. doi: 10.1370/afm.91.
7
Continuity of care: process or outcome?持续护理:过程还是结果?
Ann Fam Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):131-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.86.
8
The patient-physician relationship, primary care attributes, and preventive services.医患关系、初级保健属性及预防服务。
Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36(1):22-7.
9
Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?连续性医疗:现代全科医疗的关键要素?
Fam Pract. 2003 Dec;20(6):623-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg601.
10
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.连续性护理:多学科综述。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219.

糖尿病患者对“连续性护理”的认知与体验

Patients' perceptions and experiences of 'continuity of care' in diabetes.

作者信息

Naithani Smriti, Gulliford Martin, Morgan Myfanwy

机构信息

Research Associate, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2006 Jun;9(2):118-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00379.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00379.x
PMID:16677191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060347/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

'Continuity of care' is an important aspect of quality. However, definitions are broad and existing models of continuity are not well grounded in empirical data.

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients' experiences and values with respect to continuity in diabetes care.

METHODS

In-depth semi-structured interviews with 25 type 2 diabetic patients from 14 general practices in two inner London boroughs. Interviews were transcribed and responses analysed thematically and grouped into dimensions of continuity of care.

RESULTS

Patients' accounts identified aspects of care they valued that were consistent with four dimensions of experienced continuity of care. These were receiving regular reviews with clinical testing and provision of advice over time (longitudinal continuity); having a relationship with a usual care provider who knew and understood them, was concerned and interested, and took time to listen and explain (relational continuity); flexibility of service provision in response to changing needs or situations (flexible continuity); and consistency and co-ordination between different members of staff, and between hospital and general practice or community settings (team and cross-boundary continuity). Problems of a lack of experienced continuity mainly occurred at transitions between sites of care, between providers, or with major changes in patients' needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The study develops a patient-based framework for assessing continuity of care in chronic disease management and identifies key transition points with problems of lack of continuity. It is important that service 'redesign' and developments in vertically integrated services for chronic disease management take account of impacts on patients' experience of continuity of care.

摘要

背景

“连续性照护”是医疗质量的一个重要方面。然而,其定义宽泛,现有的连续性模型缺乏实证数据的有力支撑。

目的

确定患者在糖尿病照护连续性方面的体验和价值观。

方法

对来自伦敦两个内城区14家全科诊所的25名2型糖尿病患者进行深入的半结构式访谈。访谈内容被转录,回答经主题分析后被归纳为照护连续性的维度。

结果

患者的叙述确定了他们重视的照护方面,这些方面与体验到的照护连续性的四个维度相符。这些维度包括随着时间推移接受定期复查、临床检查以及获得建议(纵向连续性);与了解并理解他们、关心且感兴趣、愿意花时间倾听并解释的常规照护提供者建立关系(关系连续性);根据不断变化的需求或情况灵活提供服务(灵活连续性);以及不同工作人员之间、医院与全科诊所或社区机构之间的一致性与协调性(团队及跨边界连续性)。缺乏体验到的连续性的问题主要发生在照护场所之间、提供者之间的过渡阶段,或患者需求发生重大变化时。

结论

该研究建立了一个基于患者的框架,用于评估慢性病管理中的照护连续性,并确定了存在连续性问题的关键过渡点。重要的是,慢性病管理的服务“重新设计”以及垂直整合服务的发展要考虑到对患者照护连续性体验的影响。