Naithani Smriti, Gulliford Martin, Morgan Myfanwy
Research Associate, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College, London, UK.
Health Expect. 2006 Jun;9(2):118-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00379.x.
'Continuity of care' is an important aspect of quality. However, definitions are broad and existing models of continuity are not well grounded in empirical data.
To identify patients' experiences and values with respect to continuity in diabetes care.
In-depth semi-structured interviews with 25 type 2 diabetic patients from 14 general practices in two inner London boroughs. Interviews were transcribed and responses analysed thematically and grouped into dimensions of continuity of care.
Patients' accounts identified aspects of care they valued that were consistent with four dimensions of experienced continuity of care. These were receiving regular reviews with clinical testing and provision of advice over time (longitudinal continuity); having a relationship with a usual care provider who knew and understood them, was concerned and interested, and took time to listen and explain (relational continuity); flexibility of service provision in response to changing needs or situations (flexible continuity); and consistency and co-ordination between different members of staff, and between hospital and general practice or community settings (team and cross-boundary continuity). Problems of a lack of experienced continuity mainly occurred at transitions between sites of care, between providers, or with major changes in patients' needs.
The study develops a patient-based framework for assessing continuity of care in chronic disease management and identifies key transition points with problems of lack of continuity. It is important that service 'redesign' and developments in vertically integrated services for chronic disease management take account of impacts on patients' experience of continuity of care.
“连续性照护”是医疗质量的一个重要方面。然而,其定义宽泛,现有的连续性模型缺乏实证数据的有力支撑。
确定患者在糖尿病照护连续性方面的体验和价值观。
对来自伦敦两个内城区14家全科诊所的25名2型糖尿病患者进行深入的半结构式访谈。访谈内容被转录,回答经主题分析后被归纳为照护连续性的维度。
患者的叙述确定了他们重视的照护方面,这些方面与体验到的照护连续性的四个维度相符。这些维度包括随着时间推移接受定期复查、临床检查以及获得建议(纵向连续性);与了解并理解他们、关心且感兴趣、愿意花时间倾听并解释的常规照护提供者建立关系(关系连续性);根据不断变化的需求或情况灵活提供服务(灵活连续性);以及不同工作人员之间、医院与全科诊所或社区机构之间的一致性与协调性(团队及跨边界连续性)。缺乏体验到的连续性的问题主要发生在照护场所之间、提供者之间的过渡阶段,或患者需求发生重大变化时。
该研究建立了一个基于患者的框架,用于评估慢性病管理中的照护连续性,并确定了存在连续性问题的关键过渡点。重要的是,慢性病管理的服务“重新设计”以及垂直整合服务的发展要考虑到对患者照护连续性体验的影响。