• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑基于社区的干预计划,以提高慢性病患者的治疗依从性:应用层次分析法。

Prioritizing Community-Based Intervention Programs for Improving Treatment Compliance of Patients with Chronic Diseases: Applying an Analytic Hierarchy Process.

机构信息

Korean Association for AIDS Prevention, Gangwon Branch, Chuncheon 24405, Korea.

Department of Public Administration, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;18(2):455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020455.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18020455
PMID:33430108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7827405/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to apply multicriteria decision making and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for assessing sustainable management of hypertension and diabetes. Perception of two alternative health care priorities was also investigated. One priority was improving treatment compliance of patients with hypertension and diabetes. The other priority was strengthening the healthcare system for continuous care. Our study design to evaluate community-based intervention programs for hypertension and diabetes was developed using brainstorming, Delphi techniques, and content analysis along with literature review. We finally proposed a hierarchical structure of the AHP model with 50 third sub-criteria in six levels. By surveying this AHP questionnaire to a total of 185 community health practitioners in Korea, we found that improving treatment compliance of patients with chronic diseases should be relatively more important than strengthening the healthcare system. Further research is needed to expand survey subjects to primary care physicians and even policymakers of central government for the appropriate application of this AHP model.

摘要

本研究旨在应用多准则决策和层次分析法(AHP)模型来评估高血压和糖尿病的可持续管理。还调查了对两种替代医疗保健重点的看法。一个重点是提高高血压和糖尿病患者的治疗依从性。另一个重点是加强医疗保健系统以进行持续护理。我们使用头脑风暴、德尔菲技术和内容分析以及文献回顾来制定评估高血压和糖尿病社区干预计划的研究设计。我们最终提出了一个具有 6 个层次 50 个第三子标准的 AHP 模型层次结构。通过向韩国的 185 名社区卫生工作者进行 AHP 问卷调查,我们发现提高慢性病患者的治疗依从性应该比加强医疗保健系统更为重要。需要进一步研究以扩大调查对象,包括初级保健医生,甚至中央政府的政策制定者,以适当应用这种 AHP 模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a69/7827405/2c937f0fe945/ijerph-18-00455-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a69/7827405/beae264d6b94/ijerph-18-00455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a69/7827405/8b89045234df/ijerph-18-00455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a69/7827405/2c937f0fe945/ijerph-18-00455-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a69/7827405/beae264d6b94/ijerph-18-00455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a69/7827405/8b89045234df/ijerph-18-00455-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a69/7827405/2c937f0fe945/ijerph-18-00455-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prioritizing Community-Based Intervention Programs for Improving Treatment Compliance of Patients with Chronic Diseases: Applying an Analytic Hierarchy Process.优先考虑基于社区的干预计划,以提高慢性病患者的治疗依从性:应用层次分析法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;18(2):455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020455.
2
Factors Associated with Non-Adherence to Self-Management Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Survey Using the Delphi Technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process.与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理不依从相关的因素:使用德尔菲技术和层次分析法进行的调查。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jun 4;19:1247-1259. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S451332. eCollection 2024.
3
[Priority ranking of Chinese patent medicine prescriptions for type 2 diabetes mellitus (syndrome of deficiency of both Qi and Yin): based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP)].2型糖尿病气阴两虚证中成药方剂的优先级排序:基于层次分析法(AHP)
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2022 Apr;47(8):2237-2243. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20220106.502.
4
Prioritization of Injury Prevention and Management Programs and Research and Development (R&D) Projects: Survey Using the Delphi Technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process.伤害预防与管理项目以及研发(R&D)项目的优先级确定:运用德尔菲法和层次分析法的调查
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2024 Jan;36(1):78-86. doi: 10.1177/10105395231213171. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
The comparative evaluation of expanded national immunization policies in Korea using an analytic hierarchy process.运用层次分析法对韩国扩大国家免疫政策进行比较评估。
Vaccine. 2009 Jan 29;27(5):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.075. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
6
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for examining healthcare professionals' assessments of risk factors. The relative importance of risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people.用于检验医疗保健专业人员对风险因素评估的层次分析法(AHP)。社区居住老年人跌倒风险因素的相对重要性。
Methods Inf Med. 2011;50(5):435-44. doi: 10.3414/ME10-01-0028. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
7
Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care-Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey.开发以患者为中心的痴呆症护理为导向的定量偏好工具 - 第 2 阶段:形成性定性研究的见解,以设计和预测试痴呆症友好的层次分析法调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;19(14):8554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148554.
8
Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.层次分析法在医疗保健研究中的应用:系统文献综述与报告评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 24;15:112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0234-7.
9
Strategic Priorities to Improve Effectiveness of Anti-smoking Interventions for the Korean Military: An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.提高韩国军队戒烟干预效果的战略重点:层次分析法的应用
Mil Med. 2018 Jul 1;183(7-8):e223-e230. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx027.
10
Prioritizing population-based nutrition-related interventions to prevent and control hypertension in Iran: a multi-criteria decision-making approach.优先考虑基于人群的营养相关干预措施,以预防和控制伊朗的高血压:一种多标准决策方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01761-z.

引用本文的文献

1
[Evolution and Application of Disease Control Priorities].[疾病控制优先事项的演变与应用]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jan 20;55(1):95-100. doi: 10.12182/20240160603.
2
Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review.糖尿病管理与决策支持中的多标准决策:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Feb 1;12:e47701. doi: 10.2196/47701.
3
Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.了解高血压和糖尿病护理级联中的差距:系统范围综述。

本文引用的文献

1
The North Karelia Project: Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Finland Through Population-Based Lifestyle Interventions.北卡累利阿项目:通过基于人群的生活方式干预预防芬兰的心血管疾病。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020 Mar 19;14(5):495-499. doi: 10.1177/1559827620910981. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
2
History of global burden of disease assessment at the World Health Organization.世界卫生组织全球疾病负担评估的历史。
Arch Public Health. 2020 Aug 24;78:77. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00458-3. eCollection 2020.
3
Factors Affecting the Failure to Report Medical Errors by Nurses Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Feb 16;10:e51802. doi: 10.2196/51802.
4
Prioritizing population-based nutrition-related interventions to prevent and control hypertension in Iran: a multi-criteria decision-making approach.优先考虑基于人群的营养相关干预措施,以预防和控制伊朗的高血压:一种多标准决策方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01761-z.
运用层次分析法(AHP)分析影响护士报告医疗差错失败的因素。
Hosp Top. 2020 Oct-Dec;98(4):135-144. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2020.1796555. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia - A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.糖尿病与COVID-19肺炎患者的死亡率增加及疾病严重程度相关——一项系统评价、荟萃分析和Meta回归分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Jul-Aug;14(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Structural Factors Responsible for Universal Health Coverage in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Results From 118 Countries.低收入和中等收入国家全民健康覆盖的结构因素:来自118个国家的结果
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;7:414. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00414. eCollection 2019.
6
Effects of Community-Based Primary Care Management on Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes.基于社区的初级保健管理对高血压和糖尿病患者的影响。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2019 Sep;31(6):522-535. doi: 10.1177/1010539519867797. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
7
Prioritizing the health education needs based on community participation: AHP method.基于社区参与确定健康教育需求的优先次序:层次分析法
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:127. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_7_19. eCollection 2019.
8
A Community-Based Intervention for Improving Medication Adherence for Elderly Patients with Hypertension in Korea.韩国一项以社区为基础的干预措施,旨在提高老年高血压患者的药物依从性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;16(5):721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050721.
9
Quantified patient preferences for lifestyle intervention programs for diabetes prevention-a protocol for a systematic review.量化患者对糖尿病预防生活方式干预计划的偏好:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;7(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0884-5.
10
Supporting self-management for people with hypertension: a meta-review of quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews.支持高血压患者自我管理:定量和定性系统评价的元综述。
J Hypertens. 2019 Feb;37(2):264-279. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001867.