Gulliford Martin C, Naithani Smriti, Morgan Myfanwy
Division of Health and Social Care, Research, King's College, London, UK.
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;4(6):548-55. doi: 10.1370/afm.578.
Continuity is an important attribute of health care, but appropriate measures are not currently available. We developed an experience-based measure of continuity of care in type 2 diabetes.
A 19-item measure of experienced continuity of care for diabetes mellitus (ECC-DM) was developed from qualitative patient interview data with 4 continuity subdomains: longitudinal, flexible, relational, and team and cross-boundary continuity. The measure was implemented in a survey of 193 patients with type 2 diabetes from 19 family practices. Associations of ECC-DM scores with clinician organizational characteristics were estimated.
Potential ECC-DM scores ranged from 0 to 100 with an observed mean of 62.1 (SD 16.0). The average inter-item correlation was 0.343 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.908. Factor analysis found 4 factors that were generally consistent with the proposed subdomains. Patients' mean scores varied significantly between practices (P = .001), ranging from 46 to 78 at different family practices. Experienced continuity was lower for patients receiving only hospital clinic care than for those receiving some diabetes care from their family practice (difference 13.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-19.2; P <.001). Patients had higher ECC-DM scores if their family practice had a designated lead doctor for diabetes (difference 8.2; 95% CI, 2.7-13.6; P = .003).
The results provide evidence for the reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the experienced continuity-of-care measure. The measure may be used in research and monitoring to evaluate patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care. Patients' experiences of continuity of care vary between health care organizations and are influenced by the organizational arrangements for care.
连续性是医疗保健的一项重要属性,但目前尚无合适的衡量方法。我们开发了一种基于经验的2型糖尿病护理连续性衡量方法。
从对患者的定性访谈数据中开发了一项包含19个条目的糖尿病护理经验连续性(ECC-DM)衡量方法,有4个连续性子领域:纵向、灵活、关系以及团队和跨边界连续性。该衡量方法在对来自19个家庭医疗诊所的193名2型糖尿病患者的调查中实施。估计了ECC-DM得分与临床医生组织特征之间的关联。
ECC-DM潜在得分范围为0至100,观察到的平均分为62.1(标准差16.0)。平均项间相关性为0.343,克朗巴哈系数为0.908。因子分析发现4个因子,总体上与提议的子领域一致。不同诊所患者的平均得分差异显著(P = 0.001),在不同家庭医疗诊所中,得分范围为46至78。仅接受医院门诊护理的患者的经验连续性低于那些从家庭医疗诊所接受一些糖尿病护理的患者(差异为13.7;95%置信区间[CI],8.2 - 19.2;P < 0.001)。如果患者的家庭医疗诊所有指定的糖尿病主治医生,他们的ECC-DM得分会更高(差异为8.2;95% CI,2.7 - 13.6;P = 0.003)。
结果为经验性护理连续性衡量方法的可靠性、结构效度和效标效度提供了证据。该衡量方法可用于研究和监测,以评估以患者为中心的糖尿病护理结果。患者对护理连续性的体验在不同医疗保健组织之间存在差异,并受护理组织安排的影响。