Suppr超能文献

衡量糖尿病护理的连续性:一种基于经验的衡量方法。

Measuring continuity of care in diabetes mellitus: an experience-based measure.

作者信息

Gulliford Martin C, Naithani Smriti, Morgan Myfanwy

机构信息

Division of Health and Social Care, Research, King's College, London, UK.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;4(6):548-55. doi: 10.1370/afm.578.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Continuity is an important attribute of health care, but appropriate measures are not currently available. We developed an experience-based measure of continuity of care in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A 19-item measure of experienced continuity of care for diabetes mellitus (ECC-DM) was developed from qualitative patient interview data with 4 continuity subdomains: longitudinal, flexible, relational, and team and cross-boundary continuity. The measure was implemented in a survey of 193 patients with type 2 diabetes from 19 family practices. Associations of ECC-DM scores with clinician organizational characteristics were estimated.

RESULTS

Potential ECC-DM scores ranged from 0 to 100 with an observed mean of 62.1 (SD 16.0). The average inter-item correlation was 0.343 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.908. Factor analysis found 4 factors that were generally consistent with the proposed subdomains. Patients' mean scores varied significantly between practices (P = .001), ranging from 46 to 78 at different family practices. Experienced continuity was lower for patients receiving only hospital clinic care than for those receiving some diabetes care from their family practice (difference 13.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-19.2; P <.001). Patients had higher ECC-DM scores if their family practice had a designated lead doctor for diabetes (difference 8.2; 95% CI, 2.7-13.6; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide evidence for the reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the experienced continuity-of-care measure. The measure may be used in research and monitoring to evaluate patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care. Patients' experiences of continuity of care vary between health care organizations and are influenced by the organizational arrangements for care.

摘要

目的

连续性是医疗保健的一项重要属性,但目前尚无合适的衡量方法。我们开发了一种基于经验的2型糖尿病护理连续性衡量方法。

方法

从对患者的定性访谈数据中开发了一项包含19个条目的糖尿病护理经验连续性(ECC-DM)衡量方法,有4个连续性子领域:纵向、灵活、关系以及团队和跨边界连续性。该衡量方法在对来自19个家庭医疗诊所的193名2型糖尿病患者的调查中实施。估计了ECC-DM得分与临床医生组织特征之间的关联。

结果

ECC-DM潜在得分范围为0至100,观察到的平均分为62.1(标准差16.0)。平均项间相关性为0.343,克朗巴哈系数为0.908。因子分析发现4个因子,总体上与提议的子领域一致。不同诊所患者的平均得分差异显著(P = 0.001),在不同家庭医疗诊所中,得分范围为46至78。仅接受医院门诊护理的患者的经验连续性低于那些从家庭医疗诊所接受一些糖尿病护理的患者(差异为13.7;95%置信区间[CI],8.2 - 19.2;P < 0.001)。如果患者的家庭医疗诊所有指定的糖尿病主治医生,他们的ECC-DM得分会更高(差异为8.2;95% CI,2.7 - 13.6;P = 0.003)。

结论

结果为经验性护理连续性衡量方法的可靠性、结构效度和效标效度提供了证据。该衡量方法可用于研究和监测,以评估以患者为中心的糖尿病护理结果。患者对护理连续性的体验在不同医疗保健组织之间存在差异,并受护理组织安排的影响。

相似文献

1
Measuring continuity of care in diabetes mellitus: an experience-based measure.
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;4(6):548-55. doi: 10.1370/afm.578.
2
UK GPs' and practice nurses' views of continuity of care for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Fam Pract. 2007 Apr;24(2):128-37. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm003. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
4
Continuity of care and intermediate outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Fam Pract. 2007 Jun;24(3):245-51. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm014. Epub 2007 May 9.
9
Patients' perceptions and experiences of 'continuity of care' in diabetes.
Health Expect. 2006 Jun;9(2):118-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00379.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of Follow-Up Care Frequency on the Glycemic Control of Diabetic Patients in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 13;17(7):e87842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87842. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Continuity of care among diabetic patients in Accra, Ghana.
Front Public Health. 2023 May 9;11:1141080. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1141080. eCollection 2023.
7
Ghrelin Receptor Signaling Is Not Required for Glucocorticoid-Induced Obesity in Male Mice.
Endocrinology. 2020 Mar 1;161(3). doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqz023.
8

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' perceptions and experiences of 'continuity of care' in diabetes.
Health Expect. 2006 Jun;9(2):118-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00379.x.
2
Continuity of care.
Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;37(10):687-8; author reply 688.
3
Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66. doi: 10.1370/afm.285.
5
Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Apr;17(2):141-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi016. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
6
Standards of medical care in diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S4-S36.
7
Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.
8
Impact of provider continuity on quality of care for persons with diabetes mellitus.
Ann Fam Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):162-70. doi: 10.1370/afm.22.
9
Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care.
Ann Fam Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):134-43. doi: 10.1370/afm.23.
10
Continuity of care: process or outcome?
Ann Fam Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):131-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.86.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验