Sung Lillian, Feldman Brian M
Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006 Apr;28(4):263-6. doi: 10.1097/01.mph.0000212904.68899.1d.
N-of-1 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are randomized trials conducted within individuals and may be an attractive methodology for conducting studies of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in pediatric oncology. These trials may be used to determine the efficacy of an intervention in an individual, or multiple N-of-1 RCTs may be combined to estimate a population effect. There are many potential advantages to the use of N-of-1 RCTs with CAM in pediatric cancer. These advantages include the ability to determine whether CAM is effective in a specific child. In addition, the N-of-1 RCT allows parents and children to voice preferences about treatment options and allows them to directly participate in balancing adverse events and therapeutic benefits. Also, in estimation of population effects, combining multiple N-of-1 RCTs tends to require smaller sample sizes than do traditional parallel-group designs. However, there also may be several challenges to the conduct of such a trial. The use of N-of-1 RCTs may be very beneficial in evaluating CAM therapies in pediatric cancer. However, careful consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of such a design should be undertaken prior to initiating an N-of-1 RCT.
单病例随机对照试验(RCT)是在个体内部进行的随机试验,对于开展儿科肿瘤学中的补充和替代医学(CAM)研究而言,可能是一种颇具吸引力的方法。这些试验可用于确定某种干预措施对个体的疗效,或者多个单病例随机对照试验可以合并起来以估计总体效应。在儿科癌症中对补充和替代医学使用单病例随机对照试验有许多潜在优势。这些优势包括能够确定补充和替代医学在某个特定儿童身上是否有效。此外,单病例随机对照试验让家长和孩子能够表达对治疗方案的偏好,并让他们直接参与权衡不良事件和治疗益处。而且,在估计总体效应时,与传统的平行组设计相比,合并多个单病例随机对照试验往往需要更小的样本量。然而,开展这样一项试验也可能存在若干挑战。在儿科癌症中使用单病例随机对照试验来评估补充和替代医学疗法可能非常有益。但是,在启动单病例随机对照试验之前,应仔细考虑这种设计的优缺点。