Barbi E, Petaros P, Badina L, Pahor T, Giuseppin I, Biasotto E, Martelossi S, Di Leo G, Sarti A, Ventura A
Dept. of Pediatrics, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Endoscopy. 2006 Apr;38(4):368-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921194.
The need to administer procedural sedation to children has increased in recent years, as has experience in this field among nonanesthesiologists. Using propofol makes it easier to achieve sufficiently deep sedation. There is a considerable literature on the administration of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for gastroscopy in adults, but very few data are available on this issue in children. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of procedural sedation with propofol for gastroscopy in a pediatric ward with trained personnel and monitoring facilities.
A training protocol was developed to educate nurses and residents. Children requiring gastroscopy were included in the study prospectively and underwent procedural sedation with propofol administered by nonanesthesiologists.
A total of 811 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were carried out with procedural sedation. Sedation was achieved in all procedures, and all but three (0.4%) were conducted successfully. None of the patients required intubation. Stridor with signs of upper airway obstruction occurred in 14 of the 811 procedures (1.7%). Laryngoscopy was required to manage difficulties in introducing the gastroscope in 16 of the 811 procedures (2.0%). Major desaturation requiring a short course of ventilation occurred in six procedures (0.7%), and transient desaturation that resolved spontaneously occurred in 97 of the procedures (12%).
Administration of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for gastroscopy examinations in children was successful in this study, but was associated with a small risk of potentially severe complications. Although the residents were generally able to administer procedural sedation alone, constant and immediate availability of anesthesiological support continues to be mandatory.
近年来,对儿童实施程序性镇静的需求有所增加,非麻醉医生在该领域的经验也有所增加。使用丙泊酚更容易实现足够深度的镇静。关于非麻醉医生在成人胃镜检查中使用丙泊酚的文献有很多,但关于儿童这一问题的数据却非常少。本研究的目的是评估在配备训练有素的人员和监测设备的儿科病房中,丙泊酚用于胃镜检查程序性镇静的安全性和有效性。
制定了一项培训方案来培训护士和住院医师。前瞻性纳入需要进行胃镜检查的儿童,并由非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静。
共进行了811例上消化道内镜检查并实施了程序性镇静。所有检查均实现了镇静,除3例(0.4%)外均成功完成。无一例患者需要插管。811例检查中有14例(1.7%)出现伴有上呼吸道梗阻体征的喘鸣。811例检查中有16例(2.0%)在插入胃镜时需要进行喉镜检查以处理困难。6例检查(0.7%)出现需要短时间通气的严重血氧饱和度下降,97例检查(12%)出现自发缓解的短暂血氧饱和度下降。
在本研究中,非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚对儿童进行胃镜检查是成功的,但存在发生潜在严重并发症的小风险。尽管住院医师通常能够单独实施程序性镇静,但麻醉支持的持续即时可用仍然是必需的。