McKenzie Craig R M, Liersch Michael J, Finkelstein Stacey R
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 92093, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):414-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01721.x.
Should people be considered organ donors after their death unless they request not to be, or should they not be considered donors unless they request to be? Because people tend to stay with the default in a variety of domains, policymakers' choice of default has large and often important effects. In the United States, where the organ-donation policy default is "not a donor," about 5,000 people die every year because there are too few donors. Four experiments examined two domains-being an organ donor and saving for retirement-where default effects occur and have important implications. The results indicate that default effects occur in part because policymakers' attitudes can be revealed through their choice of default, and people perceive the default as indicating the recommended course of action. Policymakers need to be aware of the implicit messages conveyed by their choice of default.
人死后应被视为器官捐献者,除非他们明确表示不愿意,还是说除非他们主动提出愿意,否则不应被视为捐献者?由于人们在很多领域往往会遵循默认选项,政策制定者对默认选项的选择会产生重大且通常很重要的影响。在美国,器官捐献政策的默认选项是“非捐献者”,每年约有5000人因捐献者过少而死亡。四项实验考察了默认效应会出现且具有重要影响的两个领域——成为器官捐献者和为退休储蓄。结果表明,默认效应之所以会出现,部分原因在于政策制定者的态度可以通过他们对默认选项的选择体现出来,而人们将默认选项视为推荐的行动方案。政策制定者需要意识到他们对默认选项的选择所传达的隐含信息。