• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腐生葡萄球菌在泌尿系统感染中的作用]

[Role of Staphylococcus saprophyticus in urinary infections].

作者信息

Galiński J, Namysł E

机构信息

Katedry i Zakładu Mikrobiologii Lekarskiej AM, Gdańsku.

出版信息

Pol Tyg Lek. 1991;46(40-42):746-9.

PMID:1669150
Abstract

A proportion of S. saprophyticus in other coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from the urine of patients with urinary infections and healthy individuals has been investigated. Certain diagnostic aspect of the urinary infections with S. saprophyticus have also been considered. Hundred four coagulase-negative staphylococcal strains isolated from patients in Słupsk and Gdańsk area and 72 strains of the coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from the urine of healthy women have been divided into 9 species, according to Kloos and Schleifers' classification. Bacteriologic tests have shown that S. saprophyticus produced 20.4% of the urinary tract infections in Słupsk area holding the second place after S. haemolyticus (27.3%). This species was the most infrequent in the urine of patients in Gdańsk area (3.3%). Its sensitivity to antibiotics did not differ from that of other coagulase-negative staphylococci. In contrast to the majority of other strains, S. saprophyticus has not been isolated from the urinary tract of healthy women and has been encountered most frequently in low bacteriuria. Test of resistance to novobiocin which is considered as a simplified identification method of this species proved to be not very precise as other species have also been resistant to this antibiotic.

摘要

对来自尿路感染患者尿液及健康个体的其他凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌分离株中的腐生葡萄球菌比例进行了调查。还考虑了腐生葡萄球菌引起的尿路感染的某些诊断方面。根据克洛斯(Kloos)和施莱弗斯(Schleifers)的分类,从斯武普斯克(Słupsk)和格但斯克(Gdańsk)地区患者中分离出的104株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌株以及从健康女性尿液中分离出的72株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌株被分为9个种。细菌学检测表明,在斯武普斯克地区,腐生葡萄球菌引起了20.4%的尿路感染,仅次于溶血葡萄球菌(27.3%),位居第二。该菌在格但斯克地区患者尿液中最为少见(3.3%)。其对抗生素的敏感性与其他凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌并无差异。与大多数其他菌株不同,腐生葡萄球菌未从健康女性的尿道中分离出来,且在低菌尿症中最为常见。将对新生霉素的耐药性检测作为该菌的一种简化鉴定方法,结果证明并不十分精确,因为其他菌种也对这种抗生素耐药。

相似文献

1
[Role of Staphylococcus saprophyticus in urinary infections].[腐生葡萄球菌在泌尿系统感染中的作用]
Pol Tyg Lek. 1991;46(40-42):746-9.
2
Evaluation of API 20E strips for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci from the urinary tract.评估API 20E试条用于鉴定来自泌尿道的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。
Am J Med Technol. 1983 Dec;49(12):879-81.
3
[Microbiological and clinical features of urinary tract infections due to Staphylococcus saprophyticus (author's transl)].
Nouv Presse Med. 1980 Dec 20;9(48):3681-3.
4
Coagulase negative Staphylococci as causative agents of urinary tract infections-prevalence and resistance status in IGIMS, Patna.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌作为尿路感染的病原体——巴特那英甘地纪念医学科学研究所的患病率及耐药状况
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001 Oct;44(4):415-9.
5
Urinary tract infections due to Staphylococcus saprophyticus biotype 3.由腐生葡萄球菌生物型3引起的尿路感染。
Can Med Assoc J. 1981 Feb 15;124(4):415-8.
6
[Differentiation of coagulase negative staphylococci from significant bacteriuria].凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌与显著菌尿的鉴别
Z Gesamte Hyg. 1989 Oct;35(10):585-8.
7
Classification of coagulase-negative staphylococci in diagnostic practice.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌在诊断实践中的分类
J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1984;28(1):103-6.
8
Significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci in urinary tract infections in a developing country.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌在一个发展中国家尿路感染中的意义
Conn Med. 1998 Apr;62(4):199-203.
9
Species distribution of clinical isolates of Staphylococci.葡萄球菌临床分离株的菌种分布
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1996 Jul;39(3):207-10.
10
Phosphatase-novobiocin-mannose-inhibition test (PNMI-test) for routine identification of the coagulase-negative staphylococcal urinary tract pathogens S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus.用于常规鉴定凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌尿路病原体表皮葡萄球菌和腐生葡萄球菌的磷酸酶-新生霉素-甘露糖抑制试验(PNMI试验)。
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1990 Apr;272(4):419-25. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80042-3.