• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类姿势控制的年龄相关变化:运动协调测试

Age-related changes in human posture control: motor coordination tests.

作者信息

Peterka R J, Black F O

机构信息

Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, R. S. Dow Neurological Sciences Institute, Portland, OR 97210.

出版信息

J Vestib Res. 1990;1(1):87-96.

PMID:1670140
Abstract

Postural responses to support surface displacements were measured in 214 normal human subjects ranging in age from 7 to 81 y. Motor tests measured leg muscle electromyographic (EMG) latencies, body sway, and the amplitude and timing of changes in center of pressure displacements in response to sudden forward and backward horizontal translations of the support surface upon which the subjects stood. There were small increases in both EMG latencies and the time to reach the peak amplitude of center of pressure responses with increasing age. The amplitude of center of pressure responses showed no change with age if the amplitude measures were normalized by a factor related to subject height. In general, postural responses to sudden translations showed minimal changes with age, and all age-related trends that were identified were small relative to the variability within the population.

摘要

对214名年龄在7至81岁之间的正常人类受试者测量了对支撑面位移的姿势反应。运动测试测量了腿部肌肉肌电图(EMG)潜伏期、身体摆动以及受试者站立的支撑面突然向前和向后水平平移时压力中心位移变化的幅度和时间。随着年龄的增长,EMG潜伏期和达到压力中心反应峰值幅度的时间均略有增加。如果通过与受试者身高相关的系数对幅度测量值进行归一化,压力中心反应的幅度则不会随年龄变化。总体而言,对突然平移的姿势反应随年龄变化极小,并且所确定的所有与年龄相关的趋势相对于人群内部的变异性都较小。

相似文献

1
Age-related changes in human posture control: motor coordination tests.人类姿势控制的年龄相关变化:运动协调测试
J Vestib Res. 1990;1(1):87-96.
2
Age-related changes in human posture control: sensory organization tests.人类姿势控制中的年龄相关变化:感觉组织测试
J Vestib Res. 1990;1(1):73-85.
3
Age-related changes in postural responses revealed by support-surface translations with a long acceleration-deceleration interval.支持面长加减速间隔平移揭示的与年龄相关的姿势反应变化。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;121(1):109-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.025. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
4
Control of sway using vibrotactile feedback of body tilt in patients with moderate and severe postural control deficits.使用身体倾斜的振动触觉反馈对中度和重度姿势控制缺陷患者的摇摆进行控制。
J Vestib Res. 2005;15(5-6):313-25.
5
Effects of varying acceleration of platform translation and toes-up rotations on the pattern and magnitude of balance reactions in humans.平台平移和足尖向上旋转的不同加速度对人体平衡反应模式和幅度的影响。
J Vestib Res. 1998 Sep-Oct;8(5):381-97.
6
The influence of a bilateral peripheral vestibular deficit on postural synergies.双侧外周前庭功能缺损对姿势协同作用的影响。
J Vestib Res. 1994 Spring;4(1):49-70.
7
Anticipatory postural adjustments associated with a forward leg raising in children: effects of age, segmental acceleration and sensory context.儿童前腿抬高相关的预期姿势调整:年龄、节段性加速度和感觉环境的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
8
Characteristics of postural stability in patients with aminoglycoside toxicity.氨基糖苷类毒性患者的姿势稳定性特征。
J Vestib Res. 1994 Spring;4(1):71-80.
9
Predictors of less stable postural responses to support surface rotations in healthy human elderly.健康老年人对支撑面旋转的姿势反应稳定性较低的预测因素。
J Vestib Res. 1993 Winter;3(4):419-29.
10
An overview of age-related changes in postural control during quiet standing tasks using classical and modern stabilometric descriptors.使用经典和现代的平衡描述符概述在安静站立任务中与年龄相关的姿势控制变化。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):e513-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior-posterior and medial-lateral balance metrics are unchanged when two-dimensional pseudorandom motion perturbations are provided in semicircular canal coordinates.当在半规管坐标中提供二维伪随机运动扰动时,前后和内外平衡指标不变。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 25;16:1638493. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1638493. eCollection 2025.
2
Sustained Loss of Affects Peripheral but Not Central Vestibular Targets.持续丧失影响外周而非中枢前庭靶点。
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 16;12:768456. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.768456. eCollection 2021.
3
A comprehensive method for assessing postural control during dynamic balance testing.
一种在动态平衡测试期间评估姿势控制的综合方法。
MethodsX. 2020 Jun 13;7:100964. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100964. eCollection 2020.
4
Dynamic multi-segmental postural control in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain compared to pain-free controls: A cross-sectional study.慢性非特异性下腰痛患者与无痛对照组的动态多节段姿势控制比较:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 10;13(4):e0194512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194512. eCollection 2018.
5
Postural sensorimotor training versus sham exercise in physiotherapy of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: An exploratory randomised controlled trial.姿势感觉运动训练与慢性非特异性下腰痛物理治疗中的假运动比较:一项探索性随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 9;13(3):e0193358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193358. eCollection 2018.
6
Balance Screening of Vestibular Function in Subjects Aged 4 Years and Older: A Living Laboratory Experience.4岁及以上受试者前庭功能的平衡筛查:一项活体实验室经验。
Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 28;8:631. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00631. eCollection 2017.
7
Fear of falling and postural reactivity in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者的跌倒恐惧和姿势反应性
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 6;12(12):e0187220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187220. eCollection 2017.
8
Influence of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercise programs on idiopathic scoliosis patient in the early 20s in terms of curves and balancing abilities: single case study.本体感觉神经肌肉促进训练计划对20岁出头特发性脊柱侧凸患者的脊柱侧弯及平衡能力的影响:单病例研究
J Exerc Rehabil. 2016 Dec 31;12(6):567-574. doi: 10.12965/jer.1632796.398. eCollection 2016 Dec.
9
Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Increase above the Age of 40.40岁以上人群前庭感知阈值升高。
Front Neurol. 2016 Oct 3;7:162. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00162. eCollection 2016.
10
Evaluation of Postural Control in Patients with Glaucoma Using a Virtual Reality Environment.使用虚拟现实环境评估青光眼患者的姿势控制
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Apr 16.