• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在提高Mini-AQLQ成功完成率的干预措施评估:邮寄式与监督式完成情况的比较

Evaluation of an intervention to improve successful completion of the Mini-AQLQ: comparison of postal and supervised completion.

作者信息

Pinnock Hilary, Sheikh Aziz, Juniper Elizabeth F

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Foresterhill Health Centre, University of Aberdeen, Westburn Road, Aberdeen, Scotland AB25 2AY, UK.

出版信息

Prim Care Respir J. 2004 Mar;13(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.004
PMID:16701635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6750657/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous postal administration of Mini Asthma-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) (validated for self-completion under supervision) resulted in 12.7% completion error rate.

AIMS

To administer the Mini-AQLQ by post with instructions, and to compare completion errors with our previous study and usable response rate with supervised self-completion.

METHOD

The Mini-AQLQ, with an instruction sheet, was posted to 96 participants from UK general practice, for completion 1 week before supervised self-completion in the surgery.

RESULTS

94/96 (98%) postal questionnaires were returned: the error rate of 10.6% was similar to our previous study (postal versus previous: 10/94 versus 23/181: P=0.62). 86/96 (90%) attended for supervised completion with no completion errors (supervised versus postal: 0/86 versus 10/94: P</=0.01) Overall usable response rates were similar. (supervised versus postal: 86/96 versus 84/96, P=0.65).

CONCLUSION

Our instruction sheet did not significantly reduce postal completion errors, however the good postal return rate achieved comparable overall usable response rates to supervised administration.

摘要

引言

先前通过邮寄方式发放的简易哮喘相关生活质量问卷(Mini-AQLQ)(已验证可在监督下自行填写)的填写错误率为12.7%。

目的

通过邮寄方式发放附有说明的Mini-AQLQ,并将填写错误率与我们之前的研究进行比较,同时将有效回复率与监督下自行填写的情况进行比较。

方法

将附有说明表的Mini-AQLQ邮寄给96名来自英国普通诊所的参与者,让他们在诊所进行监督下自行填写前1周完成问卷。

结果

96份邮寄问卷中有94份(98%)被返还:10.6%的错误率与我们之前的研究相似(邮寄方式与之前相比:10/94 与 23/181:P = 0.62)。86/96(90%)的参与者参加了监督下的填写且无填写错误(监督填写与邮寄方式相比:0/86 与 10/94:P≤0.01)。总体有效回复率相似。(监督填写与邮寄方式相比:86/96 与 84/96,P = 0.65)。

结论

我们的说明表并未显著降低邮寄填写错误率,然而良好的邮寄返还率使总体有效回复率与监督管理方式相当。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an intervention to improve successful completion of the Mini-AQLQ: comparison of postal and supervised completion.一项旨在提高Mini-AQLQ成功完成率的干预措施评估:邮寄式与监督式完成情况的比较
Prim Care Respir J. 2004 Mar;13(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.004.
2
Concordance between supervised and postal administration of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) was very high.Mini哮喘生活质量问卷(MiniAQLQ)和哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)的监督管理与邮寄管理之间的一致性非常高。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):809-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.010.
3
Health-related quality of life in asthma patients - A comparison of two cohorts from 2005 and 2015.哮喘患者的健康相关生活质量 - 2005 年和 2015 年两队列的比较。
Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Does the method of administration influence the UK GMC patient questionnaire ratings?给药方法会影响英国医学总会患者调查问卷评分吗?
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2011 Jan;12(1):68-78. doi: 10.1017/S1463423610000319.
5
Patient-assessed measures of health outcome in asthma: a comparison of four approaches.哮喘患者自我评估的健康结局指标:四种方法的比较
Respir Med. 2000 Jun;94(6):597-606. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0787.
6
A comparison of data quality and practicality of online versus postal questionnaires in a sample of testicular cancer survivors.对睾丸癌幸存者样本中在线问卷和邮寄问卷的数据质量和实用性的比较。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):233-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.2052. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
7
Brief questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes in asthma: validation and usefulness in a primary care setting.哮喘患者报告结局的简短问卷:在初级保健环境中的验证及实用性
Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):925-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.925.
8
Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.《小型哮喘生活质量问卷》的编制与验证
Eur Respir J. 1999 Jul;14(1):32-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x.
9
Validation of the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ-UK English version) in Indian asthmatic subjects.哮喘患者生活质量问卷(英国英语版)在印度哮喘患者中的验证
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2005 Jul-Sep;47(3):167-73.
10
Asthma-specific quality of life and subsequent asthma emergency hospital care.哮喘特异性生活质量与后续哮喘急诊住院治疗
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Apr;14(4):206-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for the enhanced management of multimorbid patients with COPD and severe asthma: role of indoor air quality.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和重度哮喘合并症患者强化管理方案:室内空气质量的作用
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jan 20;12(1):e002589. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002589.
2
Use of Asthma APGAR Tools in Primary Care Practices: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.在初级保健实践中使用哮喘 APGAR 工具:一项集群随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):100-110. doi: 10.1370/afm.2179.
3
Clinical implications of the Royal College of Physicians three questions in routine asthma care: a real-life validation study.皇家内科医师学院在常规哮喘护理中的三个问题的临床意义:一项现实生活中的验证性研究。
Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Sep;21(3):288-94. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00052.
4
A question of quality? A single questionnaire for measuring asthma control, structuring asthma reviews, and monitoring health service standards.质量问题?一份用于衡量哮喘控制情况、构建哮喘复诊流程以及监测医疗服务标准的单一问卷。
Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Jun;21(2):122-4. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00030.