Pinnock Hilary, Burton Chris, Campbell Stephen, Gruffydd-Jones Kevin, Hannon Kerin, Hoskins Gaylor, Lester Helen, Price David
Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Sep;21(3):288-94. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00052.
Annual recording of the Royal College of Physicians three questions (RCP3Q) morbidity score is rewarded within the UK 'pay-for-performance' Quality and Outcomes Framework.
To investigate the performance of the RCP3Qs for assessing control in real-life practice compared with the validated Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) administered by self-completed questionnaire.
We compared the RCP3Q score extracted from a patient's computerised medical record with the ACQ self-completed after the consultation. The anonymous data were paired by practice, age, sex, and dates of completion. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the RCP3Q scale compared with the threshold for good/poor asthma control (ACQ ≥1).
Of 291 ACQ questionnaires returned from 12 participating practices, 129 could be paired with complete RCP3Q data. Twenty-five of 27 patients who scored zero on the RCP3Q were well controlled (ACQ <1). An RCP3Q score ≥1 predicted inadequate control (ACQ ≥1) with a sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 0.34. Comparable values for RCP3Q≥2 were sensitivity 0.50 and specificity 0.94. The intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.13 indicated substantial variability between practices. Exacerbations and use of reliever inhalers were moderately correlated with ACQ (Spearman's rho 0.3 and 0.35) and may reflect different aspects of control.
In routine practice, an RCP3Q score of zero indicates good asthma control and a score of 2 or 3 indicates poor control. An RCP3Q score of 1 has good sensitivity but poor specificity for suboptimal control and should provoke further enquiry and consideration of other aspects of control such as exacerbations and use of reliever inhalers.
在英国“绩效付费”的质量与结果框架中,每年记录皇家内科医师学院的三个问题(RCP3Q)发病率评分会得到奖励。
与通过自我填写问卷进行验证的哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)相比,调查RCP3Q在现实生活实践中评估控制情况的表现。
我们将从患者电子病历中提取的RCP3Q评分与会诊后自我填写的ACQ进行了比较。匿名数据按医疗机构、年龄、性别和填写日期进行配对。我们计算了RCP3Q量表与哮喘控制良好/不佳阈值(ACQ≥1)相比的敏感性和特异性。
从12个参与医疗机构返回的291份ACQ问卷中,129份可以与完整的RCP3Q数据配对。RCP3Q评分为零的27名患者中有25名控制良好(ACQ<1)。RCP3Q评分≥1预测控制不足(ACQ≥1)的敏感性为0.96,特异性为0.34。RCP3Q≥2的可比数值为敏感性0.50,特异性0.94。组内相关系数为0.13,表明各医疗机构之间存在较大差异。急性加重和缓解期吸入器的使用与ACQ呈中度相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分别为0.3和0.35),可能反映了控制的不同方面。
在常规实践中,RCP3Q评分为零表明哮喘控制良好,评分为2或3表明控制不佳。RCP3Q评分为1对控制不佳具有良好的敏感性,但特异性较差,应引发进一步询问并考虑控制的其他方面,如急性加重和缓解期吸入器的使用。