Haughney John, Gruffydd-Jones Kevin
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, UK.
Prim Care Respir J. 2004 Dec;13(4):185-97. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2004.06.006.
Traditionally, the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and effectiveness of interventions have been determined using measures of lung function. However, a relatively small reduction or change in lung function - such as those observed in mild to moderate COPD - may not always reflect the impact of the disease or intervention on patients' physical and psychological well-being. This paper examines the utility of various outcome measures that can be used in primary care to monitor and manage COPD. In particular, it demonstrates the importance of measuring patient-centred outcomes, such as health-related quality of life and exacerbations, which may reflect more accurately the effects of the disease and treatment on patients' everyday lives. Recent large-scale clinical trials of budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol combination therapies and tiotropium have utilised these outcome measures to show the significant benefits these treatments bestow to patients in the presence of relatively modest gains in lung function.
传统上,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的严重程度和干预措施的有效性是通过肺功能指标来确定的。然而,肺功能相对较小的降低或变化——比如在轻度至中度COPD中观察到的那些变化——可能并不总能反映疾病或干预措施对患者身心健康的影响。本文探讨了可用于基层医疗中监测和管理COPD的各种结局指标的效用。特别是,它证明了测量以患者为中心的结局指标的重要性,如健康相关生活质量和急性加重,这些指标可能更准确地反映疾病和治疗对患者日常生活的影响。最近关于布地奈德/福莫特罗、氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合疗法以及噻托溴铵的大规模临床试验已经使用了这些结局指标,以表明这些治疗方法在肺功能仅有相对适度改善的情况下给患者带来的显著益处。