Suppr超能文献

用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的吸入器中联合使用的皮质类固醇和长效β-受体激动剂。

Combined corticosteroid and long acting beta-agonist in one inhaler for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Nannini L, Cates C J, Lasserson T J, Poole P

机构信息

Pulmonary Section, Hospital G. Baigorria, Ruta 11 Y Jm Estrada, G. Baigorria, Santa Fe - Rosario, Argentina, 2152.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003794.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have both been recommended in guidelines for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Their co-administration in a combined inhaler is intended to facilitate adherence to medication regimens, and to improve efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of combined inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist preparations, compared to placebo or the individual components, in the treatment of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials register. Date of last search April 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised and double-blind. Studies could compare a combined inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonist preparation with either component preparation or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The primary outcome was exacerbations.

MAIN RESULTS

Six randomised trials with 4118 participants were included. Two different combination preparations (fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol) were used. Combination treatment was more effective than placebo for mean exacerbation rates, quality of life and lung function. No trials were found comparing the combination of drugs in a single inhaler with the same drugs both given in separate inhalers. Exacerbations: Fluticasone/salmeterol did not significantly reduce exacerbations compared with either of its component treatments in one large study. There was no significant difference when budesonide/formoterol was compared with budesonide. Budesonide/formoterol was more effective than formoterol in reducing exacerbations (Rate ratio: 0.78 [0.68 to 0.90], two studies). A pooled analysis of both combination therapies indicated that exacerbations were less frequent when compared with either placebo or long-acting beta-agonist (versus placebo Rate ratio: 0.76 [0.68, 0.84], three studies, versus beta-agonist, Rate ratio: 0.85 [0.77, 0.95], three studies), but not when compared with steroid. The clinical impact of this effect depends on the frequency of exacerbations experienced by patients. One full exacerbation was prevented for every two to four years of treatment in the type of patients included in the trials. Quality of Life: There were conflicting findings in quality of life and symptoms when fluticasone/salmeterol was compared with inhaled steroids alone (three studies). There was no significant difference between fluticasone/salmeterol and long-acting beta-agonist in quality of life scores (three studies). Budesonide/formoterol improved symptoms when compared with budesonide but not with formoterol. There were conflicting findings in quality of life scores when budesonide/formoterol was compared with component inhaled corticosteroid or beta-agonist. These may be accounted for by different study design. Lung Function: Treatment with either combination led to small, significant differences in lung function compared with component steroid medication. Fluticasone/salmeterol led to small improvements in FEV1 compared with salmeterol, but budesonide/formoterol treatment did not increase FEV1 significantly when compared with formoterol.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, combination therapy led to clinically meaningful differences in quality of life, symptoms and exacerbations. However, there were conflicting results when the different combination therapies were compared with the mono-components alone. In order to draw firmer conclusions about the effects of combination therapy in a single inhaler more data are necessary, including the assessment of the comparative effects with separate administration of the two drugs in double-dummy trials.

摘要

背景

长效β受体激动剂和吸入性糖皮质激素均被推荐用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗指南中。它们在联合吸入器中的共同给药旨在促进对药物治疗方案的依从性,并提高疗效。

目的

评估与安慰剂或单一成分相比,联合吸入性糖皮质激素和长效β受体激动剂制剂在治疗成年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane气道组慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)试验注册库。最后检索日期为2004年4月。

入选标准

纳入的研究需为随机双盲试验。研究可将联合吸入性糖皮质激素和长效β受体激动剂制剂与单一成分制剂或安慰剂进行比较。

数据收集与分析

两名评价者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。主要结局为急性加重。

主要结果

纳入了6项随机试验,共4118名参与者。使用了两种不同的联合制剂(氟替卡松/沙美特罗和布地奈德/福莫特罗)。联合治疗在平均急性加重率、生活质量和肺功能方面比安慰剂更有效。未发现将单一吸入器中的联合药物与分别使用的相同药物进行比较的试验。急性加重:在一项大型研究中,氟替卡松/沙美特罗与其单一成分治疗相比,并未显著降低急性加重率。布地奈德/福莫特罗与布地奈德相比无显著差异。布地奈德/福莫特罗在降低急性加重方面比福莫特罗更有效(率比:0.78 [0.68至0.90],两项研究)。对两种联合疗法的汇总分析表明,与安慰剂或长效β受体激动剂相比,急性加重的发生频率更低(与安慰剂相比率比:0.76 [0.68, 0.84],三项研究;与β受体激动剂相比率比:0.85 [0.77, 0.95],三项研究),但与糖皮质激素相比则不然。这种效果的临床影响取决于患者经历急性加重的频率。在试验纳入的患者类型中,每治疗两到四年可预防一次完全急性加重。生活质量:当氟替卡松/沙美特罗与单独吸入性糖皮质激素相比时,在生活质量和症状方面存在相互矛盾的结果(三项研究)。氟替卡松/沙美特罗与长效β受体激动剂在生活质量评分方面无显著差异(三项研究)。布地奈德/福莫特罗与布地奈德相比改善了症状,但与福莫特罗相比则不然。当布地奈德/福莫特罗与吸入性糖皮质激素或β受体激动剂单一成分相比时,在生活质量评分方面存在相互矛盾的结果。这些可能是由不同的研究设计导致的。肺功能:与单一成分的糖皮质激素药物相比,两种联合治疗均导致肺功能有小的显著差异。与沙美特罗相比,氟替卡松/沙美特罗使第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)有小幅改善,但与福莫特罗相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗治疗并未显著增加FEV1。

评价者结论

与安慰剂相比,联合治疗在生活质量、症状和急性加重方面产生了具有临床意义的差异。然而,当将不同的联合疗法与单一成分单独比较时,结果相互矛盾。为了就单一吸入器中联合治疗的效果得出更确凿的结论,需要更多数据,包括在双模拟试验中评估与两种药物分别给药的比较效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验