Sulaiman N D, Barton C A, Abramson M J, Liaw T, Harris C, Chondros P, Dharmage S, Clarke D
Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Broadmeadows Health Service, 35 Johnstone St, Broadmeadows Victoria 3047, Australia.
Prim Care Respir J. 2004 Dec;13(4):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2004.04.002.
Written asthma action plans (WAAPs) have become a core component of asthma management in Australia. We investigated ownership, utilisation and factors associated with ownership of asthma action plans by caregivers.
443/776 (57%) caregivers of children aged 2-14 years with asthma were identified from 32 GP clinics as part of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), and completed self-administered questionnaires.
Only 29% of participants owned a WAAP, while 13% possessed verbal instructions, and 56% had no plan. An asthma action plan for children, which was developed by a general practitioner (GP) was more likely to comprise verbal instructions (p = 0.001), while action plans developed by paediatricians were more likely to be written (p < 0.001). Just over one half of caregivers (59%) reported discussing their child's action plan the last time they visited their doctor for asthma. Factors associated with WAAP ownership included nights waking (p = 0.013), self reported severity (p = 0.001), and days lost from school (p = 0.037). Children who had seen a GP in the last 3 months for asthma, or who had been to the Emergency Department (ED) or hospital were more likely to possess a WAAP (p < 0.001). Caregivers who were less satisfied with their child's asthma control were more likely to own a WAAP (p = 0.037). Caregivers with any action plan found it useful and 82% reported using their action plan for management of an acute attack. However, caregivers with a WAAP were more likely to adhere to the plan for an acute attack compared to caregivers with verbal instructions (OR = 4.5, p < 0.05). Caregivers with a WAAP were more knowledgeable about asthma (p = 0.002), better able to recognise the difference between preventer and reliever medications (p = 0.01), and better able to recognise an asthma attack (p = 0.006).
Ownership of WAAPs in this group was still too low. Importantly, caregivers with written instructions were more knowledgeable about asthma and more likely to report following the action plan during an asthma attack.
书面哮喘行动计划(WAAPs)已成为澳大利亚哮喘管理的核心组成部分。我们调查了哮喘行动计划的拥有情况、使用情况以及与照料者拥有哮喘行动计划相关的因素。
作为一项随机对照试验(RCT)的一部分,从32家全科医生(GP)诊所中识别出443/776名(57%)2至14岁哮喘儿童的照料者,并让他们完成自我管理的问卷调查。
只有29%的参与者拥有一份WAAP,13%的人有口头指示,56%的人没有计划。由全科医生(GP)制定的儿童哮喘行动计划更有可能包含口头指示(p = 0.001),而由儿科医生制定的行动计划更有可能是书面的(p < 0.001)。略多于一半的照料者(59%)报告说,他们上次因哮喘去看医生时讨论过孩子的行动计划。与拥有WAAP相关的因素包括夜间醒来(p = 0.013)、自我报告的严重程度(p = 0.001)以及缺课天数(p = 0.037)。在过去3个月内因哮喘看过全科医生、去过急诊科(ED)或医院的儿童更有可能拥有一份WAAP(p < 0.001)。对孩子哮喘控制不太满意的照料者更有可能拥有一份WAAP(p = 0.037)。有任何行动计划的照料者都认为它很有用,82%的人报告说在急性发作管理中使用了他们的行动计划。然而,与有口头指示的照料者相比,有WAAP的照料者在急性发作时更有可能遵守计划(比值比 = 4.5,p < 0.05)。有WAAP的照料者对哮喘的了解更多(p = 0.002),更能识别预防药物和缓解药物之间的区别(p = 0.01),也更能识别哮喘发作(p = 0.006)。
该群体中WAAP的拥有率仍然过低。重要的是,有书面指示的照料者对哮喘的了解更多,并且在哮喘发作期间更有可能报告遵循行动计划。