Jerrell Jeanette M, Cousins Victoria C, Roberts Katherine M
Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Clinical Education Building, Columbia, SC 29203, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;33(4):464-73. doi: 10.1007/s11414-006-9031-5.
The reliability and validity of the Recovery Process Inventory (RPI) were assessed in a statewide sample of 459 persons with severe mental illness from a public mental health system. Six factors were identified that reflect important aspects of the recovery process, have good internal consistency and fair to moderate test-retest reliability, and yield moderate to good convergent validity on the majority of subscales. The 22-item RPI performance across these dimensions and its comparability to the Recovery Assessment Scale and related instruments, e.g., empowerment, confidence, and healing, make it a potentially valuable tool in survey research regarding the process and outcomes of recovery among mental health consumers. Suggestions for its further research and development, and use of the scale in conjunction with the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program Adult Consumer Survey are discussed.
在一个来自公共心理健康系统的、包含459名重度精神疾病患者的全州样本中，对康复过程量表（RPI）的信度和效度进行了评估。识别出了六个因素，这些因素反映了康复过程的重要方面，具有良好的内部一致性和尚可至中等的重测信度，并且在大多数子量表上具有中等至良好的收敛效度。RPI在这几个维度上的22个项目表现及其与康复评估量表和相关工具（如赋权、信心和治愈）的可比性，使其成为心理健康消费者康复过程和结果调查研究中一个潜在的有价值工具。文中讨论了对其进一步研究和开发的建议，以及该量表与心理健康统计改进计划成人消费者调查结合使用的情况。
